On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 19:00:49 -0400, "Leland C. Scott"
wrote in :


"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
.. .
Regardless, I suggested that you -measure- this apparent loss, not
calculate it (.....gee, seems I've said that before.....).

I sent you a link to somebody who did using a RF network analyzer. He
reached the same conclusions I did. Give it a read.


I did. This is what I read: "....I must admit that the UHF type barrel
connector employed here was of fairly poor quality....". That's not
exactly a fair evaluation, now is it? That's like declaring SSB sucks
because the Pace Sidetalk you picked up at a yard sale doesn't sound
like your surround-sound home theater system.

You work as an R&D engineer at an electronics firm, right? So why not
just take five minutes from your lunch hour to test the damn things?
Wouldn't that be a whole lot easier than spending all that time
digging up subjective internet pages and typing up excuses for not
doing the test? I have done tests (on both UHF connectors -and-
mag-mounts) that you can easily repeat for yourself. So what's the
problem?





-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----