On 23 Sep 2004 07:54:19 -0700, (I Am Not
George) wrote:

"Landshark" wrote:
"KAXN-9546" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:50:09 GMT, "Landshark"

wrote:


"KAXN-9546" wrote in message

The FCC passed juridstiction over to local/state level for
enforcement.
they are well within thier rights.

But doesn't that just mean enforcing existing federal
regulations?
I
don't
think local laws need to be passed for local enforcement of a
federal
law. I
could be wrong. I'm not a lawyer. :-)

-Dr.X


It's quite obvious that you are not a lawyer. States are free
to pass
any law that does not conflict with federal regulation. In this
case,
the state's law compliments the federal statute, and does not
come
in
conflict with the federal law.


Raymond Sirois KAXN-9546
SysOp: The Lost Chord BBS
607-733-5745
telnet://thelostchord.dns2go.com:6000


Your a hoot Ray.............. In this cast all
it's doing is putting into law the exact same
FCC regulation, political double talk.

Landshark

I never said they weren't. But in doing so, they established a
clear,
legal path to providing enforcement powers to a largely ignored
federal statute.


Raymond Sirois KAXN-9546
SysOp: The Lost Chord BBS
607-733-5745
telnet://thelostchord.dns2go.com:6000

Well, spitting on the sidewalk is against the law, but largely
ignored. Copying videos, either DVD or tape is a federal law,
when was the last time they raided your neighbor for that?

Landshark


Why do keyclowns defend law breaking? see how land shark runs to
uphold criminal behavior. There must be a deep seated reason for it.

Ask Doug (N8WWM) and Kathy (KC8QJP), they know all the ins and outs of
breaking the law. In fact you could call them experts.

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:09:10 -0400, "KC8QJP"
wrote:


"I Am Not George" wrote in message
om...
"Landshark" wrote:
"KAXN-9546" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:50:09 GMT, "Landshark"

wrote:


"KAXN-9546" wrote in message

The FCC passed juridstiction over to local/state level for
enforcement.
they are well within thier rights.

But doesn't that just mean enforcing existing federal
regulations?
I
don't
think local laws need to be passed for local enforcement of a
federal
law. I
could be wrong. I'm not a lawyer. :-)

-Dr.X


It's quite obvious that you are not a lawyer. States are free
to pass
any law that does not conflict with federal regulation. In this
case,
the state's law compliments the federal statute, and does not
come
in
conflict with the federal law.


Raymond Sirois KAXN-9546
SysOp: The Lost Chord BBS
607-733-5745
telnet://thelostchord.dns2go.com:6000


Your a hoot Ray.............. In this cast all
it's doing is putting into law the exact same
FCC regulation, political double talk.

Landshark

I never said they weren't. But in doing so, they established a
clear,
legal path to providing enforcement powers to a largely ignored
federal statute.


Raymond Sirois KAXN-9546
SysOp: The Lost Chord BBS
607-733-5745
telnet://thelostchord.dns2go.com:6000

Well, spitting on the sidewalk is against the law, but largely
ignored. Copying videos, either DVD or tape is a federal law,
when was the last time they raided your neighbor for that?

Landshark


Why do keyclowns defend law breaking? see how land shark runs to
uphold criminal behavior. There must be a deep seated reason for it.

whats wrong with law breaking? doug and i are both felons

And so to be convited again of insider trading, for driving up the
price of J. M. Smucker Company stock.

(I Am Not George) wrote in message om...
"Landshark" wrote:
"KAXN-9546" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:50:09 GMT, "Landshark"

wrote:


"KAXN-9546" wrote in message

The FCC passed juridstiction over to local/state level for
enforcement.
they are well within thier rights.

But doesn't that just mean enforcing existing federal
regulations?
I
don't
think local laws need to be passed for local enforcement of a
federal
law. I
could be wrong. I'm not a lawyer. :-)

-Dr.X


It's quite obvious that you are not a lawyer. States are free
to pass
any law that does not conflict with federal regulation. In this
case,
the state's law compliments the federal statute, and does not
come
in
conflict with the federal law.


Raymond Sirois KAXN-9546
SysOp: The Lost Chord BBS
607-733-5745
telnet://thelostchord.dns2go.com:6000


Your a hoot Ray.............. In this cast all
it's doing is putting into law the exact same
FCC regulation, political double talk.

Landshark

I never said they weren't. But in doing so, they established a
clear,
legal path to providing enforcement powers to a largely ignored
federal statute.


Raymond Sirois KAXN-9546
SysOp: The Lost Chord BBS
607-733-5745
telnet://thelostchord.dns2go.com:6000

Well, spitting on the sidewalk is against the law, but largely
ignored. Copying videos, either DVD or tape is a federal law,
when was the last time they raided your neighbor for that?

Landshark


Why do keyclowns defend law breaking? see how land shark runs to
uphold criminal behavior. There must be a deep seated reason for it.

It all goes back to his childhood. His younger sister used to beat him
up, and he was continually mugged for his lunch money. This has led to
a mentality of "Now that I am all (physically only) grown up, if I
don't wanna wear gender appropriate clothing or obey federal laws, I
won't." This is not to mention that he is strongly suspected in the
nearly successful Burmese tiger trap impaling of his younger sister
when he was 17. Although not proven, a desire to pay back his sister
for whipping him continually with a wooden Fly-Back paddle ever since
she was 4 and he was 12 certainly must come into consideration as a
possible motivator, if in fact he did attempt the impaling.

In general, keyclowns have very poor skills in the area of accepting
life on life's terms. Keyclowns seek to make things their way, withou
regard to the rights of others or other societal prohibitions. Again,
the sociopathic thread weaves itself into another unfortunate adult
(physically only) keyclown mind.

"Psychiatrist to keyclowns" wrote in message
m...
(I Am Not George) wrote in message
om...
"Landshark" wrote:
"KAXN-9546" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:50:09 GMT, "Landshark"

wrote:


"KAXN-9546" wrote in message

The FCC passed juridstiction over to local/state level for
enforcement.
they are well within thier rights.

But doesn't that just mean enforcing existing federal
regulations?
I
don't
think local laws need to be passed for local enforcement of a
federal
law. I
could be wrong. I'm not a lawyer. :-)

-Dr.X


It's quite obvious that you are not a lawyer. States are free
to pass
any law that does not conflict with federal regulation. In this
case,
the state's law compliments the federal statute, and does not
come
in
conflict with the federal law.


Raymond Sirois KAXN-9546
SysOp: The Lost Chord BBS
607-733-5745
telnet://thelostchord.dns2go.com:6000


Your a hoot Ray.............. In this cast all
it's doing is putting into law the exact same
FCC regulation, political double talk.

Landshark

I never said they weren't. But in doing so, they established a
clear,
legal path to providing enforcement powers to a largely ignored
federal statute.


Raymond Sirois KAXN-9546
SysOp: The Lost Chord BBS
607-733-5745
telnet://thelostchord.dns2go.com:6000

Well, spitting on the sidewalk is against the law, but largely
ignored. Copying videos, either DVD or tape is a federal law,
when was the last time they raided your neighbor for that?

Landshark


Why do keyclowns defend law breaking? see how land shark runs to
uphold criminal behavior. There must be a deep seated reason for it.

It all goes back to his childhood. His younger sister used to beat him
up, and he was continually mugged for his lunch money. This has led to
a mentality of "Now that I am all (physically only) grown up, if I
don't wanna wear gender appropriate clothing or obey federal laws, I
won't.

You tell them doug!!!!!!!! Just becauce you and I are convicted felons
shouldn't stop you from telling others
to obey those silly federal laws!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Subject: PROHIBIT THE USE OF CITIZENS BAND RADIO
From: itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
Date: 9/15/2004 6:36 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2003 HOUSE BILL 257 RATIFIED
BILL AN ACT TO PROHIBIT THE USE OF CITIZENS BAND RADIO EQUIPMENT NOT
AUTHORIZED BY THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION. The General Assembly
of North Carolina enacts: SECTION 1. Article 15 of Chapter 62 of the
General Statutes is amended by adding a new section to read: "§ 62-328.
Unauthorized use of Citizens Band equipment. (a) As used in this section,
'Citizens Band radio equipment' means Citizens Band radio equipment
authorized by the Federal Communications Commission. (b) It shall be
unlawful for any person willfully and knowingly to use Citizens Band
radio equipment not authorized by the Federal Communications Commission.
Unauthorized Citizens Band radio equipment includes the use of power
amplifiers or equipment prohibited under applicable federal regulations.
(c) This section does not apply to any licensee that is exempted under
the provisions of 47 U.S.C. § 302a(f)(2). (d) Any person willfully and
knowingly violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a
Class 3 misdemeanor." SECTION 2. This act becomes effective December 1,
2004, and applies to offenses committed on or after that date. In the
General Assembly read three times and ratified this the 28th day of June,
2004. _____________________________________ Beverly E. Perdue President
of the Senate _____________________________________ Richard T. Morgan
Speaker of the House of Representatives







Sounds like something George W Bush would vote for, unless his rich buddys are
into using cb radios, then he would vote against it. Bush is for the rich not
the middle class or lower.
Tuxedo Darien