Keyclownism: Definition...
 

Keyclownism(n): 1. The beliefs of a few disgruntled no-code tech
Amateur Radio Operators who aren't accepted on the air in the HAM
bands. 2. The belief that trashing a newsgroup, where people who
REALLY are in the know tried to help people who didn't in a civil,
intelligent, calm manner, will make one whit of difference in the
on-air activities of certain CB'ers, HAMS, and other radio operators.

Yeah.. I did pass the Appliance Operators exam.. then went right on to
take and pass the General class, and the Extra, all within 6 months.

This is really going to **** you off, too...

The only thing I had to study for was the CODE. The rest of it was
knowledge I'd gained while operating CB.. Now granted I got the
questions about the Band Limits wrong, on the Tech and the General,
But that wasn't a big deal... I only missed 1 on the Extra, and I'm
relatively sure it's because I got the +j/-j sign backwards.

Hrm.. Methinks I struck a nerve with my definition...

-SSB

itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote:

sideband wrote in news:kOT5d.915$5b1.728
@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com:


Keyclownism(n): 1. The beliefs of a few disgruntled no-code tech
Amateur Radio Operators who aren't accepted on the air in the HAM
bands. 2. The belief that trashing a newsgroup, where people who
REALLY are in the know tried to help people who didn't in a civil,
intelligent, calm manner, will make one whit of difference in the
on-air activities of certain CB'ers, HAMS, and other radio operators.




A few no codes ?/ who are they dickhead?? you passed the appliance
operators exam.

"itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge" wrote
in message ...
sideband wrote in news:kOT5d.915$5b1.728
@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com:

Keyclownism(n): 1. The beliefs of a few disgruntled no-code tech
Amateur Radio Operators who aren't accepted on the air in the HAM
bands. 2. The belief that trashing a newsgroup, where people who
REALLY are in the know tried to help people who didn't in a civil,
intelligent, calm manner, will make one whit of difference in the
on-air activities of certain CB'ers, HAMS, and other radio operators.



A few no codes ?/ who are they dickhead?? you passed the appliance
operators exam.

And you can't express yourself in common English properly. The test can't be
too hard, now can it?

sideband wrote in message ...
The only thing I had to study for was the CODE. The rest of it was
knowledge I'd gained while operating CB.. Now granted I got the
questions about the Band Limits wrong

really are there questions about swing and bird watts on the tests now LOL

I thought my English was quite common, and quite correct. If it
wasn't, I welcome your corrections and suggestions.

-SSB

I am not george, itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge are morons! wrote:


And you can't express yourself in common English properly. The test can't be
too hard, now can it?

When was the last time you took the practice tests on QRZ?

Go take the Tech, General, and Extra written elements, see how you do,
then come back and talk to me. I never talked about bird watts. I
never thought a Bird meter was all that special.

I did talk about swing, but I found out I was misinformed. I learned,
and not thanks to the AKC, but thanks to people who wanted to show me,
rather than insult me. Bees with Honey, and all that.

Now, if you'd care to quit being insulting, break down, and have an
INTELLIGENT conversation about the ways we can show the illegal
operators exactly what's right and what's wrong, and the best ways to
"get out" without breaking the rules, then let me know. Otherwise,
I'll play your silly game, and every time I see a piece of drivel come
out in a post from one of the AKC, I'll jump on it and show where
you're wrong.

The people in this newsgroup aren't stupid, they're misinformed. The
AKC should realize that, and take a different tack.

-SSB
I Am Not George wrote:

sideband wrote in message ...

The only thing I had to study for was the CODE. The rest of it was
knowledge I'd gained while operating CB.. Now granted I got the
questions about the Band Limits wrong


really are there questions about swing and bird watts on the tests now LOL

sideband wrote:
When was the last time you took the practice tests on QRZ?

Go take the Tech, General, and Extra written elements, see how you
do,
then come back and talk to me. I never talked about bird watts. I
never thought a Bird meter was all that special.

I did talk about swing, but I found out I was misinformed. I learned,
and not thanks to the AKC, but thanks to people who wanted to show
me,
rather than insult me. Bees with Honey, and all that.

Now, if you'd care to quit being insulting, break down, and have an
INTELLIGENT conversation about the ways we can show the illegal
operators exactly what's right and what's wrong, and the best ways to
"get out" without breaking the rules, then let me know. Otherwise,
I'll play your silly game, and every time I see a piece of drivel
come
out in a post from one of the AKC, I'll jump on it and show where
you're wrong.

The people in this newsgroup aren't stupid, they're misinformed. The
AKC should realize that, and take a different tack.

You do it your way, well do it our way. the AKC is a top down
organization and #1 sets the policys so complain to him.

If anyone knew who he was.. maybe it'd be possible... MAYBE...

But, since you all seem to like being anonymous, loudmouthed,
insulting, cowardly troublemakers, I don't thank it'll be possible.

-SSB

I Am Not George wrote:

sideband wrote:

When was the last time you took the practice tests on QRZ?

Go take the Tech, General, and Extra written elements, see how you

do,

then come back and talk to me. I never talked about bird watts. I
never thought a Bird meter was all that special.

I did talk about swing, but I found out I was misinformed. I learned,
and not thanks to the AKC, but thanks to people who wanted to show

me,

rather than insult me. Bees with Honey, and all that.

Now, if you'd care to quit being insulting, break down, and have an
INTELLIGENT conversation about the ways we can show the illegal
operators exactly what's right and what's wrong, and the best ways to
"get out" without breaking the rules, then let me know. Otherwise,
I'll play your silly game, and every time I see a piece of drivel

come

out in a post from one of the AKC, I'll jump on it and show where
you're wrong.

The people in this newsgroup aren't stupid, they're misinformed. The
AKC should realize that, and take a different tack.


You do it your way, well do it our way. the AKC is a top down
organization and #1 sets the policys so complain to him.

sideband wrote in message ...
Keyclownism(n): 1. The beliefs of a few disgruntled no-code tech
Amateur Radio Operators who aren't accepted on the air in the HAM
bands. 2. The belief that trashing a newsgroup, where people who
REALLY are in the know tried to help people who didn't in a civil,
intelligent, calm manner, will make one whit of difference in the
on-air activities of certain CB'ers, HAMS, and other radio operators.

Another example of a twinkie boy trying to defocus your mind from
keyclowns. Who gives a rat's ass what test you passed, your sissy? You
know you are a keykween regardless of even if your family name is
Marconi.

sideband wrote in message . com...
If anyone knew who he was.. maybe it'd be possible... MAYBE...

who are you talking about? The #1 AKC? you dont know who he is? Oh
come on dont tell me you cant read all the personal info of his
moparholic has been posting, fcc records, court records, the name of
his wife etc. Why dont you complain about what mopedope is doing,
hypocrite

Because Mopar isn't part of the problems... Those problem being the
disparaging of Amateur radio, and the trashing of this newsgroup so
that those who are in the know can help get things back down to a sane
level.

Mopar may or may not operate CB illegally. I don't know for sure. I've
never seen his station. That's not the point.

The point is, your tactics are more destructive than constructive.

Besides, the way you kids throw things around, whoever you're implying
is "in control", who hasn't come forward and claimed responsibility
for his actions, probably isn't.

-SSB

I Am Not George wrote:

sideband wrote in message . com...

If anyone knew who he was.. maybe it'd be possible... MAYBE...


who are you talking about? The #1 AKC? you dont know who he is? Oh
come on dont tell me you cant read all the personal info of his
moparholic has been posting, fcc records, court records, the name of
his wife etc. Why dont you complain about what mopedope is doing,
hypocrite

sideband wrote in message . com...
Because Mopar isn't part of the problems... Those problem being the
disparaging of Amateur radio, and the trashing of this newsgroup so
that those who are in the know can help get things back down to a
sane
level.

Mopar may or may not operate CB illegally. I don't know for sure.
I've
never seen his station. That's not the point.

The point is, your tactics are more destructive than constructive.

Besides, the way you kids throw things around, whoever you're
implying
is "in control", who hasn't come forward and claimed responsibility
for his actions, probably isn't.

-SSB

???get your facts straight the destructive tactic started with the
keyclowns going back to john wilkerson and mark fuller who were called
gay because they supported legal cb. hell even frank and jerry o. was
called gay by keyclowns for dissent against illegal cb.

BP wrote:

Are you now the (biased/revisionist) AKC historian around here? LOL!

No doubt.

-SSB

"Psychiatrist to keyclowns" wrote in message
om...
sideband wrote in message
...
Keyclownism(n): 1. The beliefs of a few disgruntled no-code tech
Amateur Radio Operators who aren't accepted on the air in the HAM
bands. 2. The belief that trashing a newsgroup, where people who
REALLY are in the know tried to help people who didn't in a civil,
intelligent, calm manner, will make one whit of difference in the
on-air activities of certain CB'ers, HAMS, and other radio operators.

Another example of a twinkie boy trying to defocus your mind from
keyclowns. Who gives a rat's ass what test you passed, your sissy? You
know you are a keykween regardless of even if your family name is
Marconi.

Unlike you though, bet he doesn't have a warning letter from the FCC!!!!

From: (I=A0Am=A0Not=A0George)
sideband wrote in message
. com... Because Mopar
isn't part of the problems... Those problem being the disparaging of
Amateur radio, and the trashing of this newsgroup so that those who are
in the know can help get things back down to a sane level. Mopar may or
may not operate CB illegally. I don't know for sure. I've never seen his
station. That's not the point. The point is, your tactics are more
destructive than constructive. Besides, the way you kids throw things
around, whoever you're implying is "in control", who hasn't come forward
and claimed responsibility for his actions, probably isn't.
-SSB
_
???get your facts straight

the destructive tactic started with the

keyclowns going back to john wilkerson and

mark fuller who were called gay because they

supported legal cb.


By those you attack in here on a daily basis? Not even remotely true.
Someone left their mark on you and wounded you deeply, as there has been
no "Mark Fuller" here in years and years, yet, you attack all those with
whom you disagree (illustrating your incredible low self-esteem and on a
daily basis. Using something that was said to you years and years ago on
usenet as a means of justifying your life's daily errant and erratic
behavior, attacks against all who educate you, and your depression is
something you will have no luck in getting others to believe.


hell even frank and jerry o. was called gay by

keyclowns for dissent against illegal cb.



If that indeed occurred, it never offended Frank, as I don't recall him
spazzing over such whimsical insult or something as impotent as another
calling him a name. Besides, Frank will not only back what he says when
he believes it with his own dialog and explanation, he will argue
vehemently for his position, popular or not. Jerry doesn't provide
anything for his accusations and claims, just hurls and tosses a few
accusational barbs and clams up when shown he is wrong. Pity, too, cause
the guy had some great info over the years and at one time was a
positive contributor, despite his radical approach, but alas...he fell
victim to his own hand.
In any event, if what you claimed above is true and it unsettles you as
much as you share, then you should direct your inner anguishes to those
that made such comments, not to the rest of the world whenever it
disagrees with you.

itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge wrote:
Talk much ?

Pot. Kettle. Black.

-SSB