"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
...
On 11 Oct 2004 10:28:39 GMT, Steveo
wrote in :

Frank Gilliland wrote:
As far as I know, Doug hasn't posted here in a
couple years, yet everyone thinks the trolling is coming from him
because he is so hated by so many.


Well that and those pesky little IP numbers in his posts, Frank.

(Psychiatrist to keyclowns) 63.127.52.37

Or is it your theory that someone in Toledo is forging him? Keep in
mind I have emails from him saved to a file that also confirm that
the fugly felon is back to his same tired ****.


BTW, I just did a little research. Turns out you can write or download
.cgi scripts that will label your outgoing packets with whatever IP
you choose (or any other identifying info). All you need is a friendly
ISP that will give you access to a directory that will let you upload
and run your own .cgi scripts.

Please let us know when you find an ISP who will allow this in today's day
and time.

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 11 Oct 2004 10:28:39 GMT, Steveo
wrote in :

Frank Gilliland wrote:
As far as I know, Doug hasn't posted here in a
couple years, yet everyone thinks the trolling is coming from him
because he is so hated by so many.


Well that and those pesky little IP numbers in his posts, Frank.

(Psychiatrist to keyclowns) 63.127.52.37

Or is it your theory that someone in Toledo is forging him? Keep in
mind I have emails from him saved to a file that also confirm that
the fugly felon is back to his same tired ****.

BTW, I just did a little research. Turns out you can write or download
.cgi scripts that will label your outgoing packets with whatever IP
you choose (or any other identifying info). All you need is a friendly
ISP that will give you access to a directory that will let you upload
and run your own .cgi scripts. Or simply run your own UNIX server. The
only positive way to tell where the posts are coming from is by the
PATH line, but those end at the Google server. So those Google posts
from Toledo could really be coming from just about anywhere.

Now there are a lot of people who hate Doug. But I can think of at
least one person who would already know how to do this type of
misdirection and have the motivation to do it -- Phil Covington.
Alternatively, the posts could be coming from someone who has never
identified himself on the newsgroup, which is not so far fetched when
you realize that Voobner never posted under his real name (despite
Phil's claim that he is Dwight Stewart).

The point is that those posts may or may not be coming from Doug and
there is no way to be sure one way or the other. It's easy to believe
what you want to believe. However, without proof it's just speculative
guessing.

Nah, he has sent me a bunch of emails confirming it too. It's him.

On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 01:08:14 GMT, "U Know Who"
wrote in
:


"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
.. .
On 11 Oct 2004 10:28:39 GMT, Steveo
wrote in :

Frank Gilliland wrote:
As far as I know, Doug hasn't posted here in a
couple years, yet everyone thinks the trolling is coming from him
because he is so hated by so many.


Well that and those pesky little IP numbers in his posts, Frank.

(Psychiatrist to keyclowns) 63.127.52.37

Or is it your theory that someone in Toledo is forging him? Keep in
mind I have emails from him saved to a file that also confirm that
the fugly felon is back to his same tired ****.


BTW, I just did a little research. Turns out you can write or download
.cgi scripts that will label your outgoing packets with whatever IP
you choose (or any other identifying info). All you need is a friendly
ISP that will give you access to a directory that will let you upload
and run your own .cgi scripts.

Please let us know when you find an ISP who will allow this in today's day
and time.


Considering it takes a .cgi script to run things like hit-counters,
form-fields, tracer-routes, etc, it's probably easier than you think.






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 01:08:14 GMT, "U Know Who"
wrote in
:


"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
. ..
On 11 Oct 2004 10:28:39 GMT, Steveo
wrote in :

Frank Gilliland wrote:
As far as I know, Doug hasn't posted here in a
couple years, yet everyone thinks the trolling is coming from him
because he is so hated by so many.


Well that and those pesky little IP numbers in his posts, Frank.

(Psychiatrist to keyclowns) 63.127.52.37

Or is it your theory that someone in Toledo is forging him? Keep in
mind I have emails from him saved to a file that also confirm that
the fugly felon is back to his same tired ****.


BTW, I just did a little research. Turns out you can write or download
.cgi scripts that will label your outgoing packets with whatever IP
you choose (or any other identifying info). All you need is a friendly
ISP that will give you access to a directory that will let you upload
and run your own .cgi scripts.

Please let us know when you find an ISP who will allow this in today's day
and time.


Considering it takes a .cgi script to run things like hit-counters,
form-fields, tracer-routes, etc, it's probably easier than you think.




Give it a shot on your site.

On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 01:23:38 GMT, "U Know Who"
wrote in
:

snip
Give it a shot on your site.


That sounds interesting. My current ISP uses a Windoze server so I
won't even try it with them. But I might be switching ISPs here very
soon, and if I do I'll see if I can find one with a UNIX server that
will let me use my own .cgi scripts.





----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
...

The trolls could be Doug, "George", Leland, Ralph, Bob, Liberace's
ghost, or Pellets the Wonder Rabbit; it doesn't really matter. What
matters is that they several of you by the balls and none of you will
let go. We all know that if you stop feeding the trolls so they will
leave, but too many here just keep feeding them. Including you.

Yup, I'm guilty, as you are too, but that's besides the point.
If "EVERYONE" stopped, maybe, but I have seen, as you, that
some will fan their own flames to start the BS.


On a better note, how's the job search? Have you tried Monster Jobs.
Dice and the number of other online sources?

Landshark


Actually, I'm waiting for the outcome of the elections. If Bush wins
I'll probably build my shop into a full-time business because any job
I get with a big company will likely be exported. If Nethercutt wins
I'm moving to Idaho or Alaska. And if -both- win I'm heading for the
hills as fast as I can!


LOL!!! I'll agree, if they both win, I'm packing the family and heading to
Idaho too. Plus Pellets the wonder Rabbit LMAO!!! Where did you
find that name?

Landshark

--
My bad..the camera is mightier than the blowhard(s)..in most respects.

From: (itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge)
(Twistedhed) wrote in news:18247-416AAC9D-222
@storefull-3257.bay.webtv.net:
That's bull****, Frank. N0BK identified George and said he was an insane
troll long before "Geo" and I ever crossd paths. In fact, Clinton was
still in office.

Frank why does this guy lie like he does???

Lie #1 Clinton was not in office on 10-2-2001


No one said he was.

Lie #2 10-2-01 is the post i made,


Has nothig to do with anything.

12-23-01 is

the post Dick made how did Dick identify

anyone?



Dick made lots of posts. This is not the one I refer.

Lie#3 Dick never called *Me* a troll, he

accused me of being Aaron,


No one ever said otherwise.

I thought Dwight was aaron??

What you think has been show to be irrelevant and of zero consequence.

Here is a post where they drool all over

themselves...roflmao.. Look at the date...

From: No Fear )

Subject: predator 10k site url

Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb

Date: 2001-10-02 16:40:48 PST

Oh thats funny a few months back you said

you sold everything I guess your

just a part timer now?

WA3MOJ


Grabbing desperately at posts and poiting to their dates is nice, but
only you seem to be impacted with bowel obstructions over this post, as
you are the one to mention it. Dick said Gee-ogre was insane. Gee-ogre
was in this group agitating when Clinton was still in office.

From: (Frank=A0Gilliland)
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:54:05 -0400, (Twistedhed)
wrote in :
Frank Gilliland wrote:
And the character "George" was obviously the
result of a troll meant to taunt Twist because
of his staunch anti-Bush position -- George
Bush/George Busch -- get it?
_
That's bull****, Frank. N0BK identified George and said he was an insane
troll long before "Geo" and I ever crossd paths. In fact, Clinton was
still in office.

The first occurance of the callsign WA3MOJ

was late in 2001,


Which is irrelevant to his being present and accounted for agitating in
this group. Of course, you can go ahead and lobby for his innocence at
this point...


but you were whining about

GWB almost two years before that -- almost a

full year prior to the election.


Yes, I was complaining about GW before the election,,and it turns out I
was correct in everything I was "whining" about, especially his
predicted failure with foreign policies and ,,,,,,,so much more.
Nevertheless, it doesn't negate Gee-ogre's presence prior to his call
being outed.


And Phil Covington was the first to note the

post with the callsign, not Dick.


I never said Dick was first. I said Dick outed him as insane. Also, as
you note, Phil may have been first to note the post with the call sign,
but that was long after he had been posting here for some time.

Dick later "identified" WA3MOJ as Aaron

Voobner (yes, Dick was occasionally wrong).


Actually, several of you who identified yourselves as AKC and "friends
of legal radio" played a hand in your mythical voobner, but only a few
of you care enough to resurrect him.


To be fair, I didn't like GWB either. But I

shudder to think of what might have happened
if Gore was in office during 9/11.


That's easy. Chances are, we wouldn't have been hit. After all, I don't
believe for a single second that GW's "terrists" (sic) would have been
beheading innocent Americans while videotaping it the entire time and
addressing it to "Gore" like they do Bush.


I have no doubt that Bush is a bigger crook

than Nixon could have ever hoped to be, but

Gore's elevator was completely out of order.


I don't believe we would have been attacked in such a manner. Yes, I
know the planning went on for years, but believe execution was done in
direct response to Bush policies and extensive and involved business
dealings with the Saudis. After all, they are alleged to have over 800
Billion invested in the Bush Amerika.

From: (Lancer)
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 18:50:32 -0400, (Twistedhed)
wrote:
Only you seem to think so..,,yet, fret not, ,,you won't be called upon
to produce any post or anything that would actually provide for your
personal problems. You've been schooled.
Anyways, that's ok. My knowledge of radio law, proper communications
(something of which *you* have demonstrated *your* lack of skill) and
public address more than makes up for what I lack in electronics.

You lack quite a bit of skill in electronics,

You are becoming redundant with no substance.



which you have demonstrated quite often.


What I have demonstrated, is your vast ignorance concerning radio law
and your low self-esteem that forces you to attempt to appoint yourself
group moderator in claiming what topics relating to radio may or may not
be permitted.


You have had many years to be shooled in

electronics,

I have had zero years in which to be schooled in electronics. You are
becoming extremely cornfused and perplexed, but this was shown to be the
case when you tried to claim moderator status.


but you still refuse to learn, or for some

reason can't learn. Why is that?


Self-projection can be countered with education, but it is your right to
insist on remaining clueless, in the dark, out of the loop, and blaming
others for your ignorance.

On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:30:50 -0400, (Twistedhed)
wrote in :

From: (Frank*Gilliland)
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:54:05 -0400, (Twistedhed)
wrote in :
Frank Gilliland wrote:
And the character "George" was obviously the
result of a troll meant to taunt Twist because
of his staunch anti-Bush position -- George
Bush/George Busch -- get it?
_
That's bull****, Frank. N0BK identified George and said he was an insane
troll long before "Geo" and I ever crossd paths. In fact, Clinton was
still in office.

The first occurance of the callsign WA3MOJ

was late in 2001,


Which is irrelevant to his being present and accounted for agitating in
this group.


But it -is- relevant to his alleged identification as "George Busch".


Of course, you can go ahead and lobby for his innocence at
this point...


Why would I do that?


but you were whining about

GWB almost two years before that -- almost a

full year prior to the election.


Yes, I was complaining about GW before the election,,and it turns out I
was correct in everything I was "whining" about, especially his
predicted failure with foreign policies and ,,,,,,,so much more.


You are indeed batting a pretty high percentage.


Nevertheless, it doesn't negate Gee-ogre's presence prior to his call
being outed.


Probably because it wasn't intended to do so.


And Phil Covington was the first to note the

post with the callsign, not Dick.


I never said Dick was first. I said Dick outed him as insane. Also, as
you note, Phil may have been first to note the post with the call sign,
but that was long after he had been posting here for some time.

Dick later "identified" WA3MOJ as Aaron

Voobner (yes, Dick was occasionally wrong).


Actually, several of you who identified yourselves as AKC and "friends
of legal radio" played a hand in your mythical voobner, but only a few
of you care enough to resurrect him.


.....and your point is....?


To be fair, I didn't like GWB either. But I

shudder to think of what might have happened
if Gore was in office during 9/11.


That's easy. Chances are, we wouldn't have been hit. After all, I don't
believe for a single second that GW's "terrists" (sic) would have been
beheading innocent Americans while videotaping it the entire time and
addressing it to "Gore" like they do Bush.


Classic "what if" scenario.


I have no doubt that Bush is a bigger crook

than Nixon could have ever hoped to be, but

Gore's elevator was completely out of order.


I don't believe we would have been attacked in such a manner. Yes, I
know the planning went on for years, but believe execution was done in
direct response to Bush policies and extensive and involved business
dealings with the Saudis. After all, they are alleged to have over 800
Billion invested in the Bush Amerika.


The US double-dealing foreign policies that ignite such hatred against
America are the result of decades upon decades of manipulation by big
business, and each administration has made their own contributions to
those policies for the past 100+ years. This storm has been building
for quite some time. Bush may have seeded the clouds, but I believe
that the attack was unavoidable, whether it was to come as it did on
9/11, or in another form by some other disgruntled madman.






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---