Lancer wrote in message news.com...
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 18:57:04 -0400, (Twistedhed)
wrote:

From: (Lancer)
On 11 Oct 2004 17:49:12 GMT, (Reg1647) wrote:
There has to be a site that has amp schematic!!
Try looking here.
http://tinyurl.com/2jvm5
_
Those rules are older than you,,or at least, appears to be the case.
Now, try and regurgitate anything you were taught this year..perhaps you
can comprehend that searching for amp schematics are legal, as is a site
providing for such information. The FCC rule pertaining to amplifier use
that you posted with the above link has no relation to one seeking the
information that 1647 was searching.

Again, I never said that looking for a schematic was illegal. It sure
looks like you forgot everything you were taught this year. Or is
your comprehension level that low?

Of course it is low, you think squirrel turds and oatmeal inside a skull can think?

(Psychiatrist to keyclowns) wrote in message . com...
Lancer wrote in message news.com...
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 18:57:04 -0400, (Twistedhed)
wrote:

From: (Lancer)
On 11 Oct 2004 17:49:12 GMT, (Reg1647) wrote:
There has to be a site that has amp schematic!!
Try looking here.
http://tinyurl.com/2jvm5
_
Those rules are older than you,,or at least, appears to be the case.
Now, try and regurgitate anything you were taught this year..perhaps you
can comprehend that searching for amp schematics are legal, as is a site
providing for such information. The FCC rule pertaining to amplifier use
that you posted with the above link has no relation to one seeking the
information that 1647 was searching.

Again, I never said that looking for a schematic was illegal. It sure
looks like you forgot everything you were taught this year. Or is
your comprehension level that low?

Of course it is low, you think squirrel turds and oatmeal inside a skull can think?

LOL

On 12 Oct 2004 12:19:43 -0700, (I Am Not
George) wrote:

(Psychiatrist to keyclowns) wrote in message . com...
Lancer wrote in message news.com...
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 18:57:04 -0400, (Twistedhed)
wrote:

From: (Lancer)
On 11 Oct 2004 17:49:12 GMT, (Reg1647) wrote:
There has to be a site that has amp schematic!!
Try looking here.
http://tinyurl.com/2jvm5
_
Those rules are older than you,,or at least, appears to be the case.
Now, try and regurgitate anything you were taught this year..perhaps you
can comprehend that searching for amp schematics are legal, as is a site
providing for such information. The FCC rule pertaining to amplifier use
that you posted with the above link has no relation to one seeking the
information that 1647 was searching.

Again, I never said that looking for a schematic was illegal. It sure
looks like you forgot everything you were taught this year. Or is
your comprehension level that low?

Of course it is low, you think squirrel turds and oatmeal inside a skull can think?

LOL

Still trying to visualize that. Is there a certain percentage mix
required?

(Psychiatrist to keyclowns) wrote in message . com...
Lancer wrote in message news.com...
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 18:57:04 -0400, (Twistedhed)
wrote:

From: (Lancer)
On 11 Oct 2004 17:49:12 GMT, (Reg1647) wrote:
There has to be a site that has amp schematic!!
Try looking here.
http://tinyurl.com/2jvm5
_
Those rules are older than you,,or at least, appears to be the case.
Now, try and regurgitate anything you were taught this year..perhaps you
can comprehend that searching for amp schematics are legal, as is a site
providing for such information. The FCC rule pertaining to amplifier use
that you posted with the above link has no relation to one seeking the
information that 1647 was searching.

Again, I never said that looking for a schematic was illegal. It sure
looks like you forgot everything you were taught this year. Or is
your comprehension level that low?

Of course it is low, you think squirrel turds and oatmeal inside a skull can think?

which keyclown brain is smarter , a peanut or the squirel turds/oatmeal mix?