Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 14th 04, 09:09 PM
Radionews
 
Posts: n/a
Default AUDIO AVAILABLE OF FCC DECISION TO PROCEED WITH BPL

AUDIO AVAILABLE OF FCC DECISION TO PROCEED WITH BPL


The FCC has acted to approve the implementation of Brodband Over
Powerline technology (BPL) for widspread Internet access in the
United States. We were able to get in and record part of the October
14th proceeding which is now posted as a downloadable MP3 file at our
website: www.arnewsline.org/quincy under the title of "EXTRA".


The speakers you will hear inorder of their appearance are FCC
Commissioners Michael Copps, Kevin Martin, Jonathan Adelstein and FCC
Chairman Michael Powell. The presentation concludes with the actual
vote to proceed with the implementation of BPL


ARNewsline (tm)











Yahoo! Groups Links


* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arnewsline/


* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

  #2   Report Post  
Old October 16th 04, 05:03 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 14 Oct 2004 20:09:07 GMT, (Radionews) wrote:

AUDIO AVAILABLE OF FCC DECISION TO PROCEED WITH BPL


The FCC has acted to approve the implementation of Brodband Over
Powerline technology (BPL) for widspread Internet access in the
United States. We were able to get in and record part of the October
14th proceeding which is now posted as a downloadable MP3 file at our
website:
www.arnewsline.org/quincy under the title of "EXTRA".


The speakers you will hear inorder of their appearance are FCC
Commissioners Michael Copps, Kevin Martin, Jonathan Adelstein and FCC
Chairman Michael Powell. The presentation concludes with the actual
vote to proceed with the implementation of BPL


ARNewsline (tm)











Yahoo! Groups Links


* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arnewsline/


* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:


After listening to the Mp3 clip I have a concern about the FCC
pulling a fast one.

The third commissioner to speak, Jonathan Adelstien was talking about
"techniques to address interference issues". He said "some of these
systems can co-exist very well with existing licensees"

Why did he feel the need to include the word "existing"? Is the plan
of the FCC to grandfather "existing amateurs" and allow them a say in
interference issues, but nullify the future amateurs ability to
complain about these same issues? Will the total burden of
interference be the problem of future amateurs? Will the FCC only
have to wait until the existing licensees die out before they can go
full throttle with BPL?
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AUDIO AVAILABLE OF FCC DECISION TO PROCEED WITH BPL Radionews Broadcasting 0 October 15th 04 02:32 AM
AUDIO AVAILABLE OF FCC DECISION TO PROCEED WITH BPL Radionews Policy 0 October 14th 04 09:07 PM
AUDIO AVAILABLE OF FCC DECISION TO PROCEED WITH BPL Radionews General 0 October 14th 04 09:07 PM
Amateur Radio Newslin(tm) Report 1385 – February 27, 2004 Radionews Broadcasting 0 March 5th 04 01:26 AM
stuff for all hams [email protected] General 0 December 19th 03 07:31 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017