LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old November 27th 04, 11:51 AM
Frank Gilliland
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 03:01:05 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote in
:

snip
The Supreme Court picks and chooses which cases it wants to hear based on
how widely it would affect the law of the land.



That's naive. Every other agency of the government operates under the
table to some extent. What makes you think the FCC is any different?



I should rephrase this: The Supreme Court only selects cases that are
presented to it. Unless the outcome can be 'assured', the FCC prevents
potentially hazardous cases from going that far up the ladder either
by offering settlements (and/or kickbacks) that are too good to pass
up, or by simply dropping the case. Those tactics are underhanded
attempts to avoid an unfavorable ruling by the Supreme Court. Such a
ruling could very possibly collapse the legal foundation of the FCC's
operation.







----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
'keyclowns' prevail! Dave Policy 2 December 5th 04 12:36 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017