Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Landshark" wrote in message news ![]() "Leland C. Scott" wrote in message ... "Frank Gilliland" wrote in message ... Name one federal agency that doesn't claim to suffer from a lack of funding. I'm thinking........ Maybe the IRS? 8-)) I have used that argument myself but I have since found out that it doesn't wash: Many CBers -don't- know the rules. And while any person can refuse a station inspection, most CBers (and many hams) are not aware that such a refusal can be used as 'evidence' against him, and is therefore a violation of the 5th amendment. I would like to see some legal opinions in that area. You do rasie an interesting point. Wrong. You can't challenge the violation in court like you can a traffic ticket. FCC fines are enforced by the Treasury Dept as uncollected debts, -not- as violations of FCC rules. I've read where some who have gotten NAL's have had their day in court in front of an administrative law judge. CFR 47 and the rules under it are considered administrative law and can thus be heard in court. Some have even won their cases. Check it out for yourself. Was that after only one NAL? Yeah, why not? You don't need to get more than one speeding ticket to get your day in court do you? Did they go before Congress to get the "rule" on the "export" radio's? So where did the huge volume of laws on the books come from when all this country started with are a handful of articles under the US Constitution? I don't think so. They, like the IRS can take almost any existing law and interpret it their own way and create a new "rule". That's why they are called rules, not laws. Its call "Adminastrive Law". Ask an attorney. He'll tell you the same thing. Wrong. Notice what happens when a cop is on the road Tell that to the truckers I see routinely doing 60+ MPH in crealy marked 55 MPH zones, cops or not. Police presence DOES make a difference. But only if they know for sure they will actually do something. I was in Georgia driving south of Atlanta, on my way to Macon for a work assignment, driving on I75 a week ago. I got routinely passed by truckers doing well over 70 MPH, which is the posted speed limit. I also saw plenty of 4 wheelers getting pulled over for speeding. I can't recall seeing any of the hordes of speeding 18 wheelers getting pulled over. And I saw plenty of cops everywere I went. Well Lee, they cracked down on truckers out here. It was all over the news how they were giving a zero tolerance for a month on all big rigs. The issue is not about a person's right to use a radio transmitter, but about the protections of the accused that are -supposed- to be guaranteed by the constitution. Like, 'innocent until proven guilty in a court of law'. Last time I checked the FCC is not a part of the judicial branch. They can accuse but they CANNOT determine guilt. That's why their citations are notifications of APPARENT liability. Like I said above, if you don't like it take it to the judge. Same as a speeding ticket. Not really. Again, you have to appear before the FCC and pay the fines before you can begin to contest their ruling. No. How many times can you afford to have an attorny apera on your behalf? Have you paid any FCC fines? If someone uses a radio transmitter in violation of the law then by all means they should be held accountable. But the -means- by which that person is brought to justice by the FCC is unconstitutional and they know it. Anybody who disagrees with an FCC NAL can have their day in court and there is nothing the FCC can do to stop it. See above. EVERY person has the constitutional right to challenge ANY law. The problem is that the FCC has been very careful about preventing any such challenges. Ah no. Ah, Frank's right. You guys need to read this before going any further. Sample court motion below. http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/dfiles/file_158.pdf Offical FCC legal process. The link below should be all on one line to work. http://frwebgate5.access.gpo.gov/cgi...i on=retrieve This should settle the argument permently if you understand legal terms. -- Leland C. Scott KC8LDO Wireless Network Mobile computing on the go brought to you by Micro$oft |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
'keyclowns' prevail! | Policy |