AKCM wrote:
Twist, states CAN make laws that are more

restrictive than federal law. What they cannot

do, is take away certain rights. Case in point:

It is legal to drink alcohol in public on Sunday

in the eyes of the feds. Some states say it is

illegal. And this is just one case, there are

many others. Where did you get this notion

that states laws cannot be more restrictive?


I said no such thing. State law can always be more restrictive than
federal law, but it may never permit what federal law restricts. I said
federal law always supercedes state law. If a state law permits it,
(such as medicinal pot) and the federal law restricts it (such as
telephone tampering and wiretapping), the federal law wins every time,
unless, of course, a state chooses to secede and avail itself of all
federal monies and benefits it receives.

"Twistedhed" wrote in message
...
AKCM wrote:
Twist, states CAN make laws that are more

restrictive than federal law. What they cannot

do, is take away certain rights. Case in point:

It is legal to drink alcohol in public on Sunday

in the eyes of the feds. Some states say it is

illegal. And this is just one case, there are

many others. Where did you get this notion

that states laws cannot be more restrictive?


I said no such thing. State law can always be more restrictive than
federal law, but it may never permit what federal law restricts. I said
federal law always supercedes state law. If a state law permits it,
(such as medicinal pot) and the federal law restricts it (such as
telephone tampering and wiretapping), the federal law wins every time,
unless, of course, a state chooses to secede and avail itself of all
federal monies and benefits it receives.


But federal law states you can tape a private conversation as long as one
party is aware.

itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
wrote:
i work
with law enforcement officials on a daily basis this has come up in may
scenarios such as wire taps also law enforcement have cameras in thier
cruisers and wear microphones they dont have to and dont tell you that
you are being audio and video recoreded

Really, what do you do for a living?

Really, what do you do for a living?

private eye.

Steveo wrote
wrote:
Really, what do you do for a living?

private eye.

After you pull the foreskin away from pie hole, mouth breather.



oh wise guy huh now I am going to have to come to your house and beat
you up. whats your address?

"Steveo" wrote in message
...
itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
wrote:
i work
with law enforcement officials on a daily basis this has come up in may
scenarios such as wire taps also law enforcement have cameras in thier
cruisers and wear microphones they dont have to and dont tell you that
you are being audio and video recoreded

Really, what do you do for a living?

He's a tuning fork for radar guns ;)
That's why he was selling his radar detector on EBay.

Landshark


--
Is it so frightening to have me at your shoulder?
Thunder and lightning couldn't be bolder.
I'll write on your tombstone, ``I thank you for dinner.''
This game that we animals play is a winner.

"Landshark" wrote:
"Steveo" wrote in message
...
itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
wrote:
i work
with law enforcement officials on a daily basis this has come up in
may scenarios such as wire taps also law enforcement have cameras in
thier cruisers and wear microphones they dont have to and dont tell
you that you are being audio and video recoreded

Really, what do you do for a living?

He's a tuning fork for radar guns ;)
That's why he was selling his radar detector on EBay.

Landshark

Radar dectectors are so 90's. Reckon his dad knows he's about to
part with his radar detector? Breaker Breaker WA3MOJ.

From:
(U=A0Know=A0Who)
"Twistedhed" wrote in message
...
AKCM wrote:
Twist, states CAN make laws that are more
restrictive than federal law. What they cannot
do, is take away certain rights. Case in point:
It is legal to drink alcohol in public on Sunday
in the eyes of the feds. Some states say it is
illegal. And this is just one case, there are
many others. Where did you get this notion
that states laws cannot be more restrictive?
-
I said no such thing. State law can always be more restrictive than
federal law, but it may never permit what federal law restricts. I said
federal law always supercedes state law. If a state law permits it,
(such as medicinal pot) and the federal law restricts it (such as
telephone tampering and wiretapping), the federal law wins every time,
unless, of course, a state chooses to secede and avail itself of all
federal monies and benefits it receives.

But federal law states you can tape a private

conversation as long as one party is aware.


Not on the telephone, it doesn't.