|
FCC: N8WWM guilty of radio violations
N8WWM continues to badger people on this forum for their subject choice,
telling them they are illegal. However, when his own hypocritical behavior is illustrated, N8WWM lies, claiming he never committed any violations. Well, here is the letter from the FCC not only claiming Adair committed violations, but also have in their possession taped recordings of Adair's multiple offenses and violations. _ Dear Mr. Lagger: Our records indicate that you are the trustee for the above repeater system. Enclosed are recordings of violations on the repeater by N8WWM. The transmissions continued for a considerable time and there was no evidence of a control operator. Since you are the trustee for the repeater, it is important for you to understand that you are responsible for its proper operation. The decision to operate a repeater is a totally voluntarily one. Repeaters are a convenience in the Amateur Radio Service, not a necessity. A repeater is a station just like any other station; and under Section 97.205 of the Commission's rules, all stations must have a licensee and control operator. Under Sections 97.103(a) and 97.105, control operators must ensure the immediate proper operation of a station, regardless of the type of station control. Furthermore, "automatic" control does not mean "unattended" operation. Unattended operation is not authorized under the rules. The repeater licensee/trustee is responsible for all recurring violations and violations that are not inadvertent, just as a licensee is responsible for a base station HF station operation in the licensee's home. You must prevent recurring and deliberate violations on the repeater by locking rule violators out, using tones, warning users, limiting its operation, or taking whatever steps necessary commensurate with your responsibility as the licensee of the station. If you are unable to do so, then you must shut down your station. If you are unwilling or unable to prevent violations on the W8RZM repeater, then your operator and station license will be subject to enforcement action by the Commission. Such action may include monetary forfeiture, operator license suspension or station license revocation. -- |
"Twistedhed" wrote in message ... N8WWM continues to badger people on this forum for their subject choice, telling them they are illegal. However, when his own hypocritical behavior is illustrated, N8WWM lies, claiming he never committed any violations. Well, here is the letter from the FCC not only claiming Adair committed violations, but also have in their possession taped recordings of Adair's multiple offenses and violations. _ Dear Mr. Lagger: Our records indicate that you are the trustee for the above repeater system. Enclosed are recordings of violations on the repeater by N8WWM. The transmissions continued for a considerable time and there was no evidence of a control operator. Since you are the trustee for the repeater, it is important for you to understand that you are responsible for its proper operation. The decision to operate a repeater is a totally voluntarily one. Repeaters are a convenience in the Amateur Radio Service, not a necessity. A repeater is a station just like any other station; and under Section 97.205 of the Commission's rules, all stations must have a licensee and control operator. Under Sections 97.103(a) and 97.105, control operators must ensure the immediate proper operation of a station, regardless of the type of station control. Furthermore, "automatic" control does not mean "unattended" operation. Unattended operation is not authorized under the rules. The repeater licensee/trustee is responsible for all recurring violations and violations that are not inadvertent, just as a licensee is responsible for a base station HF station operation in the licensee's home. You must prevent recurring and deliberate violations on the repeater by locking rule violators out, using tones, warning users, limiting its operation, or taking whatever steps necessary commensurate with your responsibility as the licensee of the station. If you are unable to do so, then you must shut down your station. If you are unwilling or unable to prevent violations on the W8RZM repeater, then your operator and station license will be subject to enforcement action by the Commission. Such action may include monetary forfeiture, operator license suspension or station license revocation. Twistedhed, At the risk of incurring your wrath, may I offer comment without getting into a battle of personal attacks and angry insults? The letter you offer in this case was not TO Mr. Adair, but to the trustee, or owner, of the repeater. Now, I am not defending N8WWM, or promoting anything he might be doing, but there is, in this letter, no "proof" that he did anything. The letter admonishes the trustee of his responsibilities as to the ALLEGED violations of a station whose callsign was obviously used in the commission of *some*, or certain, violations of FCC rules. The violator could have been someone just pirating his callsign in attempt to get Mr Adair in trouble, or just a random act of a pirate who heard Mr Adair's callsign on the repeater. That has happened before. Thus, the letter was sent to the trustee advising of the fact that he was, apparently, derelict in HIS duty in not turning off the machine, etc, or taking other steps to prevent the violation(s). Respectfully, -- |
|
Jon Lippert wrote: This letter smells like a fraud. That is what I thought as well. Oh how those missed English classes in high school come back to haunt us. In any case, it is all a function of their fear of the AKC. They know we run this group and they hate it. All they are doing is screaming in their spoiled, impotent rage at the fact that they cannot do a spittin' thing about it. Even if the letter is 100% legit, it accuses N8WWM of nothing. If further threatens N8WWM with nothing. As for it being written by a high schooler??? Hmmmmm...well that would be giving way too much credit to either keyclown cb dorks or government employees. |
There is no shame in the simple concept of agreeing to disagree
without resorting to insults, innuendo, and other lowball tactics. talk about lowball tactics Twitsy knows the facts about the Ohio repeater case. believe me he has searched the fcc records and found nothing additional concerning doug no letter of warning no NAL zero zip nada. If there was something more it would be posted here by him or his followers. he is just playing games and you answering him with respect just encourages more trolling by him jerry |
wrote in message oups.com... There is no shame in the simple concept of agreeing to disagree without resorting to insults, innuendo, and other lowball tactics. talk about lowball tactics Twitsy knows the facts about the Ohio repeater case. believe me he has searched the fcc records and found nothing additional concerning doug no letter of warning no NAL zero zip nada. If there was something more it would be posted here by him or his followers. he is just playing games and you answering him with respect just encourages more trolling by him jerry Good lord man, he already politely told you to STFU! Going on only makes you look dense. |
UKnowWho wrote:
Good lord man, he already politely told you to STFU! Going on only makes you look dense. shut up randy |
wrote in message ups.com... UKnowWho wrote: Good lord man, he already politely told you to STFU! Going on only makes you look dense. shut up That's what he told you to do. |
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 00:02:34 GMT, "U Know Who"
wrote: wrote in message oups.com... UKnowWho wrote: Good lord man, he already politely told you to STFU! Going on only makes you look dense. shut up That's what he told you to do. He gets his panties all wet when people dont agree with the ALL KISS COCKS club! |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com