Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 10th 04, 12:57 PM
Twistedhed
 
Posts: n/a
Default FCC: N8WWM guilty of radio violations

N8WWM continues to badger people on this forum for their subject choice,
telling them they are illegal. However, when his own hypocritical
behavior is illustrated, N8WWM lies, claiming he never committed any
violations. Well, here is the letter from the FCC not only claiming
Adair committed violations, but also have in their possession taped
recordings of Adair's multiple offenses and violations.
_

Dear Mr. Lagger:
Our records indicate that you are the trustee for the above repeater
system. Enclosed are recordings of violations on the repeater by N8WWM.
The
transmissions continued for a considerable time and there was no
evidence
of a control operator.
Since you are the trustee for the repeater, it is important for you to
understand that you are responsible for its proper operation. The
decision
to operate a repeater is a totally voluntarily one. Repeaters are a
convenience in the Amateur Radio Service, not a necessity. A repeater is
a
station just like any other station; and under Section 97.205 of the
Commission's rules, all stations must have a licensee and control
operator.
Under Sections 97.103(a) and 97.105, control operators must ensure the
immediate proper operation of a station, regardless of the type of
station
control. Furthermore, "automatic" control does not mean "unattended"
operation. Unattended operation is not authorized under the rules.
The repeater licensee/trustee is responsible for all recurring
violations
and violations that are not inadvertent, just as a licensee is
responsible
for a base station HF station operation in the licensee's home. You must
prevent recurring and deliberate violations on the repeater by locking
rule
violators out, using tones, warning users, limiting its operation, or
taking whatever steps necessary commensurate with your responsibility as
the licensee of the station. If you are unable to do so, then you must
shut
down your station.
If you are unwilling or unable to prevent violations on the W8RZM
repeater,
then your operator and station license will be subject to enforcement
action by the Commission. Such action may include monetary forfeiture,
operator license suspension or station license revocation.
--


  #2   Report Post  
Old December 10th 04, 05:08 PM
Jerry
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Twistedhed" wrote in message
...
N8WWM continues to badger people on this forum for their subject choice,
telling them they are illegal. However, when his own hypocritical
behavior is illustrated, N8WWM lies, claiming he never committed any
violations. Well, here is the letter from the FCC not only claiming
Adair committed violations, but also have in their possession taped
recordings of Adair's multiple offenses and violations.
_

Dear Mr. Lagger:
Our records indicate that you are the trustee for the above repeater
system. Enclosed are recordings of violations on the repeater by N8WWM.
The
transmissions continued for a considerable time and there was no
evidence
of a control operator.
Since you are the trustee for the repeater, it is important for you to
understand that you are responsible for its proper operation. The
decision
to operate a repeater is a totally voluntarily one. Repeaters are a
convenience in the Amateur Radio Service, not a necessity. A repeater is
a
station just like any other station; and under Section 97.205 of the
Commission's rules, all stations must have a licensee and control
operator.
Under Sections 97.103(a) and 97.105, control operators must ensure the
immediate proper operation of a station, regardless of the type of
station
control. Furthermore, "automatic" control does not mean "unattended"
operation. Unattended operation is not authorized under the rules.
The repeater licensee/trustee is responsible for all recurring
violations
and violations that are not inadvertent, just as a licensee is
responsible
for a base station HF station operation in the licensee's home. You must
prevent recurring and deliberate violations on the repeater by locking
rule
violators out, using tones, warning users, limiting its operation, or
taking whatever steps necessary commensurate with your responsibility as
the licensee of the station. If you are unable to do so, then you must
shut
down your station.
If you are unwilling or unable to prevent violations on the W8RZM
repeater,
then your operator and station license will be subject to enforcement
action by the Commission. Such action may include monetary forfeiture,
operator license suspension or station license revocation.


Twistedhed,

At the risk of incurring your wrath, may I offer comment without getting
into a battle of personal attacks and angry insults?

The letter you offer in this case was not TO Mr. Adair, but to the trustee,
or owner, of the repeater. Now, I am not defending N8WWM, or promoting
anything he might be doing, but there is, in this letter, no "proof" that he
did
anything. The letter admonishes the trustee of his responsibilities as to
the ALLEGED violations of a station whose callsign was obviously used in the
commission of *some*, or certain, violations of FCC rules. The violator
could have been someone just pirating his callsign in attempt to get Mr
Adair in trouble, or just a random act of a pirate who heard Mr Adair's
callsign on the repeater. That has happened before. Thus, the letter was
sent to the trustee advising of the fact that he was, apparently, derelict
in HIS duty in not turning off the machine, etc, or taking other steps to
prevent the violation(s).


Respectfully,


--




  #4   Report Post  
Old December 10th 04, 10:13 PM
Psychiatrist to keyclowns
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Jon Lippert wrote:
This letter smells like a fraud.


That is what I thought as well. Oh how those missed English classes

in high
school come back to haunt us.


In any case, it is all a function of their fear of the AKC. They know
we run this group and they hate it. All they are doing is screaming in
their spoiled, impotent rage at the fact that they cannot do a spittin'
thing about it.

Even if the letter is 100% legit, it accuses N8WWM of nothing. If
further threatens N8WWM with nothing.

As for it being written by a high schooler??? Hmmmmm...well that would
be giving way too much credit to either keyclown cb dorks or government
employees.

  #6   Report Post  
Old December 10th 04, 11:21 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

There is no shame in the simple concept of agreeing to disagree
without resorting to insults, innuendo, and other
lowball tactics.


talk about lowball tactics Twitsy knows the facts about the Ohio
repeater case. believe me he has searched the fcc records and found
nothing additional concerning doug no letter of warning no NAL zero zip
nada. If there was something more it would be posted here by him or his
followers. he is just playing games and you answering him with respect
just encourages more trolling by him jerry

  #7   Report Post  
Old December 10th 04, 11:29 PM
U Know Who
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message
oups.com...
There is no shame in the simple concept of agreeing to disagree
without resorting to insults, innuendo, and other
lowball tactics.


talk about lowball tactics Twitsy knows the facts about the Ohio
repeater case. believe me he has searched the fcc records and found
nothing additional concerning doug no letter of warning no NAL zero zip
nada. If there was something more it would be posted here by him or his
followers. he is just playing games and you answering him with respect
just encourages more trolling by him jerry


Good lord man, he already politely told you to STFU! Going on only makes you
look dense.


  #8   Report Post  
Old December 10th 04, 11:34 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

UKnowWho wrote:
Good lord man, he already politely told you to STFU!
Going on only makes you look dense.


shut up randy

  #9   Report Post  
Old December 11th 04, 12:02 AM
U Know Who
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message
ups.com...
UKnowWho wrote:
Good lord man, he already politely told you to STFU!
Going on only makes you look dense.


shut up


That's what he told you to do.


  #10   Report Post  
Old December 11th 04, 02:27 AM
Smooth G
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 00:02:34 GMT, "U Know Who"
wrote:


wrote in message
oups.com...
UKnowWho wrote:
Good lord man, he already politely told you to STFU!
Going on only makes you look dense.


shut up


That's what he told you to do.

He gets his panties all wet when people dont agree with the ALL KISS
COCKS club!
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1412 ­ September 3, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 September 4th 04 08:34 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 ­ June 25, 2004 Radionews Policy 1 June 26th 04 02:07 AM
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1384 February 20, 2004 Radionews General 0 February 27th 04 09:40 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 Radionews CB 0 January 18th 04 09:36 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017