On 14 Jan 2005 16:43:30 GMT, Steveo
wrote:

ÂÂ*ÂÂ*ÂÂ*ÂÂ*ÂÂ*ÂÂ*ÂÂ*ÂÂ*
ÂÂ*ÂÂ*ÂÂ*ÂÂ*ÂÂ*ÂÂ*ÂÂ*ÂÂ*ÂÂ*ÂÂ*ÂÂ*ÂÂ*à ‚Â*ÂÂ*ÂÂ*ÂÂ*

WTF is that, Twist!? :D

He's "tagging" posts again........

Dave
"Sandbagger"

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:42:55 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:

N3CVJ wrote:
Yes, you are correct, the DX enables distant

splatter boxes to be heard in you local area

No one was talking about extra power or illegal power,,

I was. That was the original point of this whole thread.


try and remain
focused, Davie.


You should follow your own advice.

Dave
"Sandbagger"

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:47:49 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:

N3CVJ wrote:
At this point, it's best to just leave it go.

Agreed,,the Phelps issue is haunting you almost as bad as your
self-professed skills and knowledge regarding your status as an extra
that a roger beep is illegal and going over 70 MPH makes one a federal
criminal.

You brain is short-circuiting again. You're starting to babble....


Guys like Landshark, understand what the
topic is and will understand a good
explanation.

That's almost as rich as what follows, as Shark and I said the exact
same thing concerning DX. You arr suffering a great deal on this
aubject.

No, not exactly. But at least when the proper context was explained.
Lanshark acknowledged such. While you continue to defend and twist
words.


Dave
"Sandbagger"

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:51:19 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:


simplistic and literal translations fail to account
for the reality that those questions are all
relative or subjective, depending on the
writer's perspective and point of reference. But
I'd guess those concepts are beyond your
reasoning ability.

To be fair, your guesses are steeped in ignorance and the refusal to
learn.

Quite the contrary, in order for one to learn, one must learn to ask
the proper questions.


Only you seem to suffer with interpretive skills when others use
simplistic terms.

But the difference is, that I ask for clarification as to the specific
point that someone is making, while you assume what they are trying to
say, and are usually wrong.


After all, only you express great difficulty interpreting each writer's
perspective, which is why you have to ask everyone what they mean when
they use extremely simplistic terms

Simplistic does not preclude the sense of subjectivity that the term
may refer.

But you don't understand that. To you everything is black or white.

Dave
"Sandbagger"

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:57:17 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:
that doing over 70 mph makes one a federal
criminal,

Not that I care or anything, but to avoid further embarrassment at
once again confusing me with another, I'd suggest you recheck your
obsession with personal searches. I never made that claim.

Dave
"Sandbagger"

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:02:18 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:

From: (Steveo)
ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*ƚÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*
ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*ƚÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ* ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*
WTF is that, Twist!? :D
_
ÂÂÂ*ÂÂYou mean you don't know? Email me,,,webtv is foolproof when
quoting certain posters and only certain usenet access services leave
such marks. Call it internet fingerprints.

Like this?

Lancer wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:02:18 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:

From: (Steveo)
ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*ƚÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*
ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*ƚÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*
ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*ƚÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂ*
WTF is that, Twist!? :D _
ÂÂÂ*ÂÂYou mean you don't know? Email me,,,webtv is foolproof
when quoting certain posters and only certain usenet access services
leave such marks. Call it internet fingerprints.

Like this?

Is  Chinese for Lancer? :)

On 14 Jan 2005 18:03:40 GMT, Steveo
wrote:

Lancer wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:02:18 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:

From: (Steveo)
ÂÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂÂ*ƚÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂÂ* *ÂÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂÂ*ƚÂÂÂ*
ÂÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂÂ*ƚÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂÂ* *ÂÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂÂ*ƚÂÂÂ*
ÂÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂÂ*ƚÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂÂ* *ÂÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂÂ*ƚÂÂÂ*
WTF is that, Twist!? :D _
ÂÂÂÂ*ÂÂYou mean you don't know? Email me,,,webtv is foolproof
when quoting certain posters and only certain usenet access services
leave such marks. Call it internet fingerprints.

Like this?

Is  Chinese for Lancer? :)

Not working today Steve?

On 14 Jan 2005 18:03:40 GMT, Steveo
wrote:

Lancer wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:02:18 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:

From: (Steveo)
ÂÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂÂ*ƚÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂÂ* *ÂÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂÂ*ƚÂÂÂ*
ÂÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂÂ*ƚÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂÂ* *ÂÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂÂ*ƚÂÂÂ*
ÂÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂÂ*ƚÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂÂ* *ÂÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂÂ*ƚÂÂÂ*
WTF is that, Twist!? :D _
ÂÂÂÂ*ÂÂYou mean you don't know? Email me,,,webtv is foolproof
when quoting certain posters and only certain usenet access services
leave such marks. Call it internet fingerprints.

Like this?

Is  Chinese for Lancer? :)

I don't think so, Chinese have all those wacked out characters..

Where one letter means a word..

Lancer wrote:
On 14 Jan 2005 18:03:40 GMT, Steveo
wrote:

Lancer wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:02:18 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:

From: (Steveo)
ÂÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂÂ*ƚÂÂÂ*Ãâ€
šÃ‚ÂÂ*ÂÂÂÂ* Â*ÂÂÂ
Â*ÂÂÂÂ*
ÂÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂÂ*ƚÂÂÂ*Ãâ€
šÃ‚ÂÂ*ÂÂÂÂ* Â*ÂÂÂ
Â*ÂÂÂÂ*
ÂÂÂÂ*ÂÂÂÂ*ƚÂÂÂ*Ãâ€
šÃ‚ÂÂ*ÂÂÂÂ* Â*ÂÂÂ
Â*ÂÂÂÂ* WTF is that, Twist!? :D _
ÂÂÂÂ*ÂÂYou mean you don't know? Email me,
,,webtv is foolproof when quoting certain posters and only certain
usenet access services leave such marks. Call it internet
fingerprints.

Like this?

Is  Chinese for Lancer? :)

Not working today Steve?

Working in the office.