Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 14th 05, 01:37 AM
Vinnie S.
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:58:40 -0600, "Richard" wrote:

On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:50:35 -0500 Vinnie S. wrote:

Hi. If I want to talk abrefoot and run a dipole for 27 MHz in my attic,
I
noticed there are numerous versions. The vertical is out for obvious
reasons. So
there are inverted and horizontal. Is there any version I am better off
using
barefoot?


Vinnie S.


How about a fiberglass marine antenna which requires no ground plane?

Or just as well, a 4ft fiberglass with a piece of metal for the ground
effect.
Being indoors or out, makes little difference.
It's what is covering the antenna that makes the difference.



Well, there is this. Essentially, it's a 5 foot 5/8 wave Firestik, but the
radials are rather short 30". Shouldn't the be like 9ft?

http://www.firestik.com/Catalog/IBA5.htm

Again, I only want this for a temporary solution.

Vinnie S.
  #2   Report Post  
Old January 14th 05, 03:22 PM
Richard
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Vinnie S." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:58:40 -0600, "Richard" wrote:

On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:50:35 -0500 Vinnie S. wrote:

Hi. If I want to talk abrefoot and run a dipole for 27 MHz in my attic,
I
noticed there are numerous versions. The vertical is out for obvious
reasons. So
there are inverted and horizontal. Is there any version I am better off
using
barefoot?


Vinnie S.


How about a fiberglass marine antenna which requires no ground plane?

Or just as well, a 4ft fiberglass with a piece of metal for the ground
effect.
Being indoors or out, makes little difference.
It's what is covering the antenna that makes the difference.



Well, there is this. Essentially, it's a 5 foot 5/8 wave Firestik, but the
radials are rather short 30". Shouldn't the be like 9ft?

http://www.firestik.com/Catalog/IBA5.htm

Again, I only want this for a temporary solution.

Vinnie S.


Yeah that should work decent as a temp antenna.
Since it has the ground plane rods built in.
Since it's 5ft, that means it's coil loaded. Hence, the 30".
Just don't expect to get the mileage out of it as a bigger antenna would
get.



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
80/160 trap dipole question - last one I hope Ken Bessler Antenna 1 November 3rd 04 05:05 PM
From the Extra question pool: The dipole Robert Casey Policy 2 January 28th 04 06:30 AM
From the Extra question pool: The dipole David Robbins General 1 January 23rd 04 05:32 PM
From the Extra question pool: The dipole David Robbins Policy 0 January 23rd 04 05:16 PM
70 ohm dipole to 50 ohm feed line question Tom Sedlack Antenna 10 October 6th 03 01:24 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017