NNTP-Posting-Date: =A0=A0 Tue, Jan 18, 2005, 12:49pm (EST-1) Group:
=A0=A0 rec.radio.cb Subject: =A0=A0 How would you improve your NFL
team From: =A0=A0 itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
User-Agent: =A0=A0
Xnews/06.08.25 X-No-Archive: =A0=A0 yes Date: =A0=A0 Tue, Jan 18, 2005,
12:49pm (EST-1) X-Trace: =A0=A0
sv3-2UqM/8rNd26w4xoivZ0uWPCbXjBlpvB8GyXtl9ZCNmgLNKT4aLc7gtS HeFczA+R/eUtU97=
NwxlfL3XR!SQrKtMMmP3/AfVx9IF5SLbTKB/+GB0uZESQw9oAbzVhnr5kW44+YHf43RyxAvN9N=
jRHl
X-Complaints-To: =A0=A0 X-DMCA-Complaints-To: =A0=A0
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Please be sure to forward
a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Otherwise we will be
unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: =A0=A0 1.3.22
(Twistedhed) wrote in news:15309-41ED33CD-354
@storefull-3257.bay.webtv.net:
Pittsburgh is known among the pros for never covering the spread. It's
a bet to avoid. Nice going. As of now, the Pats are favored. Someone is
gonna lose big money.

Steve this guy assclown twipsy likes to lie and

distort facts like there is no tommorow. Any

one who bet on Pitt all year "Cleaned up"

as

they were 10-5 against the spread with a

push. If you bet Pitt and NE all year you would
be a gawdy 21-8 ATS No tout, handicapping

service, 900 number can touch those

percentages. Next year people and the

bookies will be on to PITT and adjust the line

accordingly.

Division Standings

=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0W=
/L/T
=A0 ATS =A0 =A0 =A0 O/U

Pittsburgh 15-1 =A0 10-5-1 =A0 =A0 8-8

New England 14-2 =A0 11-3-2 =A0 =A0 8-7-1


Your deficit, Dave, is hurting you. Pay attention: "Is known" by the
pros, Dave. How does one get known, grasshoppah? By their history.
Historically, Pittsburgh is known for not covering the spread. Citing
the single exception (this year) to the rule is nice, but has nothing to
do with the pros picks and how the team is viewed in such circles. Now
pick yourself up and cscrape yourself off from my shoe.

On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:34:32 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:


NNTP-Posting-Date: ** Tue, Jan 18, 2005, 12:49pm (EST-1) Group:
** rec.radio.cb Subject: ** How would you improve your NFL
team From: ** itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
User-Agent: **
Xnews/06.08.25 X-No-Archive: ** yes Date: ** Tue, Jan 18, 2005,
12:49pm (EST-1) X-Trace: **
sv3-2UqM/8rNd26w4xoivZ0uWPCbXjBlpvB8GyXtl9ZCNmgLNKT4aLc7gtS HeFczA+R/eUtU97NwxlfL3XR!SQrKtMMmP3/AfVx9IF5SLbTKB/+GB0uZESQw9oAbzVhnr5kW44+YHf43RyxAvN9NjRHl
X-Complaints-To: ** X-DMCA-Complaints-To: **
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: ** Please be sure to forward
a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: ** Otherwise we will be
unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: ** 1.3.22
(Twistedhed) wrote in news:15309-41ED33CD-354
:
Pittsburgh is known among the pros for never covering the spread. It's
a bet to avoid. Nice going. As of now, the Pats are favored. Someone is
gonna lose big money.

Steve this guy assclown twipsy likes to lie and

distort facts like there is no tommorow. Any

one who bet on Pitt all year "Cleaned up"

as

they were 10-5 against the spread with a

push. If you bet Pitt and NE all year you would
be a gawdy 21-8 ATS No tout, handicapping

service, 900 number can touch those

percentages. Next year people and the

bookies will be on to PITT and adjust the line

accordingly.

Division Standings

************************W/L/T
* ATS * * * O/U

Pittsburgh 15-1 * 10-5-1 * * 8-8

New England 14-2 * 11-3-2 * * 8-7-1


Your deficit, Dave, is hurting you. Pay attention: "Is known" by the
pros, Dave. How does one get known, grasshoppah? By their history.
Historically, Pittsburgh is known for not covering the spread. Citing
the single exception (this year) to the rule is nice, but has nothing to
do with the pros picks and how the team is viewed in such circles. Now
pick yourself up and cscrape yourself off from my shoe.

As part of Narcissistic Personality Disorder, it is common that since
suffers view themselves as always right, they therefore cannot fathom
how so many people can disagree with them. So in order to justify your
position, you tell yourself that the many people who find you to be "a
few fries short of a happy meal", are really one or two people
pretending to be all the others. It offers you a security blanket of
self-justification for your belligerence and haughty behavior.

Dave
"Sandbagger'

From: pam
(itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge)
(Twistedhed) wrote in
:

Your deficit, Dave, is hurting you. Pay attention: "Is known" by the
pros, Dave. How does one get known, grasshoppah? By their history.
Historically, Pittsburgh is known for not covering the spread. Citing
the single exception (this year) to the rule is nice, but has nothing to
do with the pros picks and how the team is viewed in such circles. Now
pick yourself up and cscrape yourself off from my shoe.

How many years do you want to go back

twsity??


Apparently, back before your recent attempts at reading the sheets.

your getting deeper and deeper

The Pittsburgh Steelers are 29-20 ATS since

2000.


Now check the spread vs. the odds and compare it to ANY other team. THAT
is how one reads their record concerning the spread, but then again, if
you knew what you were speaking, you would have cited the source instead
of an outsider's interpretation.


Not counting 2004

http://sportspic.vegasexperts.com/articles.asp

?aid=509

As a road favorite of a TD or less, Pittsburgh

is a very impressive 6-1-2 ATS in their last

nine contests, including a 4-0-1 mark in their

last five games... additionally, the Steelers are
working on a perfect 11-0 ATS mark when

favored by 7.5 points or less over the last two

seasons... in other words, Pittsburgh takes

care of business when the expected outcome

is close...


You really have no concept of what the spread entails and I am weary of
teaching and correcting you this week.


PIT is 7-7 ATS over the last 10 years (L10Y)

in playoff games



Which is meaningless. Take in to consideration
all their games in the last ten years and you may find the zen which
escapes you.