From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:08:37 -0500, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:
From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:04:01 -0500, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:
http://www.****qrz.com
Yet another example of someone who had

their feelings hurt and who is now on a

personal vendetta. It's childish in any case.

Dave

"Sandbagger"

http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj

You obviously are more familiar with the site than myself, as I was just
made aware of it. Can you enlighten the contingency about whose feelings
were hurt and why?

Just read the site.


I did.

The author has outlines his "beef" quite

clearly.

I find nothing to indicate any hurt feelings. Again, I ask you once
again to explain your position. What is it that has you subjectively
indicating hurt feelings were responsible for the creator's site? Thomas
Paine created his paper the Federalist and people like you screamed
similar to what you offer now attempting to explain his actions,,,,,and
his paper was anonymous. Yet, the person you accuse makes very clear his
intention for his actions....censorship. And these folks are not
anonymous.
When one wishes to have an avenue free from undue interference and
censorship, sometimes one must create that avenue themselves. This is
twice in two days you have taken an American born patriotic birthright
and trashed it,,first was the right to select civil disobedience, now,
you accuse one who voices his own opinion on his own site with nothing
more than your own based subjective opinion, formed by reading the site
he took to task.




There were also discussions on QRZ on the

"other side".



Invocation of the site he decries as improperly censoring as the pillar
of truth for -your- subjective bias is no different than the site
builder's actions you take issue with,,,,you just happen to be on the
"other side" (your words). Such is hardly an unbiased look at each site
regarding the issue that sparked the creation of the site responsible
for effectively moving you to the point of lambasting the creators. In
that vein, the site you take issue with is an instant success, for if it
moved you in such a manner. In the media, there is no bad press,
regardless what you have been told. The only thing the public masses
love more than controversy is resiliency from one who was once
down...the underdog.


David T. Hall Jr.

"Sandbagger"

n3cvj