Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Hall" wrote in message ... On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:41:29 -0400, Once again you base your mistaken opinion on technicalities and semantics. Someone who murders someone is still guilty of a criminal act regardless if he's been caught yet. Being pronounced guilty is only a formality. The same holds true for the FCC rules. Here we go again. DAVE, is Michael Jackson guilty? Think before you answer, are you there? sitting in the jury box? listening to the testimony? following the judges orders concerning what type of evidence you are going to hear? not formulating any opinion until you and the rest of your fellow jurors are deliberating the case? Of course not, so how can you say because someone here is running a 1000 watts and talking on the freeband is a criminal? You can't, you are not a sheriff, judge & jury, to which is the only way someone can be classified a criminal, after being convicted, before that they are only a suspect. Only a court of law can refer to one as a criminal, and yes, the fact that one has NOT been caught yet (as you tried and failed with) most certainly abdicates them from being referred a criminal,,,,,again, the fact that you disagree with our justice system is YOUR bad. Yep, the old subversive ploy of thinking that "it's only guilty if you're caught" mentality. Typical of all slackers and scofflaws. Nope, it's called a guilty conscience, to which you can only be called guilty in front of the lord all-mighty, everything else has to be done through a court of law. Dave Landshark -- Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen. |