Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 11 May 2005 08:40:31 -0400, Dave Hall
wrote in : On Wed, 11 May 2005 02:36:52 -0700, Frank Gilliland wrote: The politics of science is often more important than the science itself. It's a proven fact that the Earth is undergoing a period of global warming, and that it's caused by the influence of man on the environment. But politics plays the game that such facts are nothing more than speculations made by a few fringe researchers looking to get their names in the journals. There has been no conclusive proof that global warming is primarily the result of man's influence over the environment. Yes, there is indeed conclusive proof. In fact there has been clear evidence that this planet has experienced major cyclical climatic changes over the eons. The current warming trend may just be a part of that process, and man's contribution to it may be much less significant than what the environmental alarmists would lead us to believe. That's what I was talking about when I said "the politics of science". How did life come to be? Who cares? The only fact we know is that it -does- exist. So let's just make the most of it while it lasts. Existentialism. IMHO a rather selfish and closed mindset. Gee, and I thought you said that you were a realist. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|