On Mon, 02 May 2005 20:23:03 GMT, Lancer wrote:

On Mon, 02 May 2005 18:32:15 GMT, "Jim Hampton"
wrote:


"mopathetic is STILL a chickenboy, won't say where he is camping"
wrote in message
groups.com...
uhhh, no. Who needs a firewall?


*Everyone* should have a firewall. If you aren't set up as invisible, your
machine will respond to pinging.

If I have a router in between you won't see my PC, firewall or not.
My router doesn't broadcast my local machine address's.

I too have a router, but am not sure if I am invisible. I do use the router
firewall and software firewall.


Vinnie S.

"Vinnie S." wrote in message
...
On Mon, 02 May 2005 20:23:03 GMT, Lancer wrote:

On Mon, 02 May 2005 18:32:15 GMT, "Jim Hampton"
wrote:


"mopathetic is STILL a chickenboy, won't say where he is camping"
wrote in message
egroups.com...
uhhh, no. Who needs a firewall?


*Everyone* should have a firewall. If you aren't set up as invisible,
your
machine will respond to pinging.

If I have a router in between you won't see my PC, firewall or not.
My router doesn't broadcast my local machine address's.

I too have a router, but am not sure if I am invisible. I do use the
router
firewall and software firewall.


Vinnie S.

I can't see you. But then again, you may just be too far away. g

"Jim Hampton" wrote:
"mopathetic is STILL a chickenboy, won't say where he is camping"
wrote in message
oups.com...
uhhh, no. Who needs a firewall?


*Everyone* should have a firewall. If you aren't set up as invisible,
your machine will respond to pinging.

Hello Jim.

Save your time explaining anything to dogie except maybe proper antenna
installation.

http://img64.echo.cx/my.php?image=dogie049cy.jpg

I am not positive here (and I am no lawyer--but the man you stalk needs to
take your posts and pics to one), but you seem in violation of the stalking
laws--I think if he now sues your A$$ he will have gobs of money to feed his
kids with!!!

Regards,
John

"Steveo" wrote in message
...
| "Jim Hampton" wrote:
| "mopathetic is STILL a chickenboy, won't say where he is camping"
| wrote in message
| oups.com...
| uhhh, no. Who needs a firewall?
|
|
| *Everyone* should have a firewall. If you aren't set up as invisible,
| your machine will respond to pinging.
|
| Hello Jim.
|
| Save your time explaining anything to dogie except maybe proper antenna
| installation.
|
| http://img64.echo.cx/my.php?image=dogie049cy.jpg

"John Smith" wrote:
I am not positive here

SHOCKING

From: (John=A0Smith)
I am not positive here (and I am no

lawyer--but the man you stalk needs to take

your posts and pics to one), but you seem in

violation of the stalking laws--


Cite the single passage you misinterpret him violating as pertains to
stalking laws.

I think if he now sues your A$$ he will have

gobs of money to feed his kids with!!!

Regards,

John


No chance at all. Mopar was publicly invited by Dogie. -You- need to
talk to a lawyer and have him properly explain what constitutes
stalking, as you are misinformed. In the meantime, try not to think
about such things.

Jim Hampton wrote:
*Everyone* should have a firewall. If you aren't set up as invisible, your
machine will respond to pinging.

Your machine is vulnerable without a firewall, *especially* if you are on
broadband. Regardless, even a dial-up should have a good firewall as well
as an anti-virus program running at all times whilst on the Internet. It is
also a good idea to have an anti-spyware program as well.


I just have my cable/DSL router between my modem and PC's.

I find those programs cause more grief then they save.

"Scott in Baltimore" wrote in message
...


Jim Hampton wrote:
*Everyone* should have a firewall. If you aren't set up as invisible,
your
machine will respond to pinging.

Your machine is vulnerable without a firewall, *especially* if you are
on
broadband. Regardless, even a dial-up should have a good firewall as
well
as an anti-virus program running at all times whilst on the Internet.
It is
also a good idea to have an anti-spyware program as well.


I just have my cable/DSL router between my modem and PC's.

I find those programs cause more grief then they save.

Hello, Scott

Long time no hear. You have a hardware solution (the router) and it is an
*excellent* solution of course. I was speaking in generalities, of course,
and the hardware solution is actually the preferred solution. But no
solution can leave one very vulnerable. I just sent a URL to a neighbor to
run the on-line virus scan (house call). She had a problem before when a
"tech" reformatted her hard drive and didn't put the anti-virus nor firewall
in place.

She upgraded to XP and I had to inform her she wanted to set up an account
for herself as a user and not log in as administrator and leave the computer
on 24/7 (she is on cable).

Yep, Monday evening she told me she had problems again. The last time it
took me two trips over there and I am not doing it again. If she is still
capable of accessing the Internet, she can do the on-line scan and probably
pretty much fix the thing (for a short while). Hmmmm ... wonder if she
knows about system restore? I don't know; I do know that I'm not going
through that again (at least for free LOL). Come to think of it, I don't
really want to go over there again - regardless.


73 from Rochester, NY
Jim

Long time no hear. You have a hardware solution (the router) and it is an
*excellent* solution of course. I was speaking in generalities, of course,


My EchoLink (AOL chatroom for hams) has been on at night. Give it a ring...

From: pam
(itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge)
(I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in news:9844-4276C807-
:
From: (John=A0Smith)
I am not positive here (and I am no
lawyer--but the man you stalk needs to take your posts and pics to one),
but you seem in violation of the stalking laws--
Cite the single passage you misinterpret him violating as pertains to
stalking laws.
I think if he now sues your A$$ he will have gobs of money to feed his
kids with!!!
Regards,
John
-
No chance at all. Mopar was publicly invited by Dogie. -You- need to
talk to a lawyer and have him properly explain what constitutes
stalking, as you are misinformed. In the meantime, try not to think
about such things.
-
You have no idea who made the invite,

The rest of your post assumes the above to be true. You have discounted
the possibility the identity of one who made such a physical threat was
found immediately after the post and logged with the isp's he utilized,
due to them being contacted and instructed future legal ramifications
may arise referring this specific user due his violation of the law.
But I'll play devil's advocate for you.


some one says they are george bush and to

come to the white house you have carte

blanche to go there?


Good point. I taught N3CVJ this a few posts ago when he said saying
something on usenet is the same as a guilty plea in a court of law.
Where were you then? : )

Dont be so ****ing stupid. just the same as I

AM NOW CHRIS BUSCH loL this assclown is

as clueless as you tipsy.. and thats bad


(shrug) Clueless is providing the FCC a false address. It's also a
crime.