"Jim Hampton" wrote:
"mopathetic is STILL a chickenboy, won't say where he is camping"
wrote in message
oups.com...
uhhh, no. Who needs a firewall?


*Everyone* should have a firewall. If you aren't set up as invisible,
your machine will respond to pinging.

Hello Jim.

Save your time explaining anything to dogie except maybe proper antenna
installation.

http://img64.echo.cx/my.php?image=dogie049cy.jpg

"Vinnie S." wrote in message
...
On Mon, 02 May 2005 20:23:03 GMT, Lancer wrote:

On Mon, 02 May 2005 18:32:15 GMT, "Jim Hampton"
wrote:


"mopathetic is STILL a chickenboy, won't say where he is camping"
wrote in message
egroups.com...
uhhh, no. Who needs a firewall?


*Everyone* should have a firewall. If you aren't set up as invisible,
your
machine will respond to pinging.

If I have a router in between you won't see my PC, firewall or not.
My router doesn't broadcast my local machine address's.

I too have a router, but am not sure if I am invisible. I do use the
router
firewall and software firewall.


Vinnie S.

I can't see you. But then again, you may just be too far away. g

"Jeff Mayner" wrote:
Steveo wrote:
"U Know Who" wrote:
"U Know Who" wrote in message
news Ping 205.162.217.34
[cblmdm205-162-217-34.buckeye-express.com]

Round trip time to 205.162.217.34: 56 ms
Round trip time to 205.162.217.34: 47 ms
Round trip time to 205.162.217.34: 51 ms
Round trip time to 205.162.217.34: 57 ms
Round trip time to 205.162.217.34: 50 ms
Round trip time to 205.162.217.34: 51 ms
Round trip time to 205.162.217.34: 47 ms
Round trip time to 205.162.217.34: 57 ms
Round trip time to 205.162.217.34: 50 ms
Round trip time to 205.162.217.34: 48 ms


Average time over 10 pings: 51.4 ms



Ping 68.41.138.160
[bgp987471bgs.madsnh01.mi.comcast.net]

Round trip time to 68.41.138.160: 49 ms
Round trip time to 68.41.138.160: 48 ms
Round trip time to 68.41.138.160: 49 ms
Round trip time to 68.41.138.160: 47 ms
Round trip time to 68.41.138.160: 60 ms
Round trip time to 68.41.138.160: 61 ms
Round trip time to 68.41.138.160: 73 ms
Round trip time to 68.41.138.160: 52 ms
Round trip time to 68.41.138.160: 64 ms
Round trip time to 68.41.138.160: 62 ms

Average time over 10 pings: 56.5 ms

Ping time coincidence? Nah.

Who do we know in madison hts?

http://img145.echo.cx/my.php?image=scan00032pg.jpg

OH!

I rated that image "Astonishing!". ;-)

Jeff

It's almost priceless, Jeff.

I am not positive here (and I am no lawyer--but the man you stalk needs to
take your posts and pics to one), but you seem in violation of the stalking
laws--I think if he now sues your A$$ he will have gobs of money to feed his
kids with!!!

Regards,
John

"Steveo" wrote in message
...
| "Jim Hampton" wrote:
| "mopathetic is STILL a chickenboy, won't say where he is camping"
| wrote in message
| oups.com...
| uhhh, no. Who needs a firewall?
|
|
| *Everyone* should have a firewall. If you aren't set up as invisible,
| your machine will respond to pinging.
|
| Hello Jim.
|
| Save your time explaining anything to dogie except maybe proper antenna
| installation.
|
| http://img64.echo.cx/my.php?image=dogie049cy.jpg

"John Smith" wrote:
I am not positive here

SHOCKING

No. NOT SHOCKING...
ECCONOMICLY BURDENING!!!--to the party sued...

Regards,
John

"Steveo" wrote in message
...
| "John Smith" wrote:
| I am not positive here
|
| SHOCKING

On Mon, 02 May 2005 22:08:00 GMT, "U Know Who" wrote:


"mopathetic is STILL a chickenboy, won't say where he is camping"
wrote in message
legroups.com...
uhhh, no. Who needs a firewall?


*Everyone* should have a firewall. If you aren't set up as invisible,
your
machine will respond to pinging.

If I have a router in between you won't see my PC, firewall or not.
My router doesn't broadcast my local machine address's.

I too have a router, but am not sure if I am invisible. I do use the
router
firewall and software firewall.


Vinnie S.

I can't see you. But then again, you may just be too far away. g

Get some glasses !!!


Vinnie S.

Vinnie S. wrote:
Get some glasses !!!

Vinnie S.

Sol's reading glasses?

From: (John=A0Smith)
I am not positive here (and I am no

lawyer--but the man you stalk needs to take

your posts and pics to one), but you seem in

violation of the stalking laws--


Cite the single passage you misinterpret him violating as pertains to
stalking laws.

I think if he now sues your A$$ he will have

gobs of money to feed his kids with!!!

Regards,

John


No chance at all. Mopar was publicly invited by Dogie. -You- need to
talk to a lawyer and have him properly explain what constitutes
stalking, as you are misinformed. In the meantime, try not to think
about such things.

(I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:
From: (John=A0Smith)
I am not positive here (and I am no

lawyer--but the man you stalk needs to take

your posts and pics to one), but you seem in

violation of the stalking laws--

Cite the single passage you misinterpret him violating as pertains to
stalking laws.

I think if he now sues your A$$ he will have

gobs of money to feed his kids with!!!

Regards,

John

No chance at all. Mopar was publicly invited by Dogie. -You- need to
talk to a lawyer and have him properly explain what constitutes
stalking, as you are misinformed. In the meantime, try not to think
about such things.

Thanks Twist. One only needs to read 4 or 5 of "John Smiths" posts
to realize he is a kOOk. Anyone that has an inkling of taking me
to court best have a strong enough case to pay for the counter suit,
from a snake in the grass attorney. I hate lawyers enough to have a
few as customers, so I can keep up with the **** that goes down.