|
ATTN: I AmnotGeorgeBush,tell us about spread spectrum 11 meter cb radios.
where can we find one?
|
Freeband sucks wrote:
where can we find one? His version of spread-spectrum is turning that power microphone *way* up, that way, your signal spreads out. Sorry, had to get that in there... Guy |
|
|
|
On Wed, 4 May 2005 19:29:25 -0400, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote: From: (FreebandĀ*sucks) where can we find one? The technology is there,,you just have to -learn- it. Tell you what,,think about part 15 transceivers,,,,think about chips,..... now think about different modes,,outside the box....think about UHF.....now,,,if you still are confused, please explain why automatic hopping of freqs on the freeband is such a difficult concept for you. Since you can't seem to grasp this idea, forget about even casually mentioning digital sequencing to you,,,,you'd win the pool!!! : ) no,the subject says 11 meters. not part 15 transceivers, not uhf. what part of 11 meters cant you understand? now answer the question,where can i find an 11 meter spread spectrum cb radio? if you don't know admit it! you just have to learn, you shouldnt make posts stating something as fact unless you can back up your statements with facts. you fall way short of that little boy IAmNotGeorgeBusch is just a con man playing his usual word games. All he can do is spin, no actual facts. |
I AmnotGeorgeBush wrote:
From: am (Guy) Freeband sucks wrote: where can we find one? His version of spread-spectrum is turning that power microphone *way* up, that way, your signal spreads out. Sorry, had to get that in there... Guy Hey,,don't be sorry. You serve a valuable lesson: you reinforce the ignorance of select hammies who are licensed for communications but are clueless and incompetent when it comes to such. Perhaps that's why you feel the need to say such things about others, after all, if you were confident and satisfied in your abilities in life, there would be no need for such actions toward others. Carry on, my child. There it is... Without knowing anything about me, without knowing what I do for a living, without knowing the things I've done over the past three decades in the field of computers and radio, without knowing who I am, you make a huge jump in logic and begin to personnally attack me verbally. You couldn't just laugh with me and then drop it, could you? You've shown me that you do know something. You're able to convey meaning over these posts. The trouble is, the meaning you convey creates a sense of ill-will and *you know it*. You don't add anything of value to these posts. You've made it clear you are not a team player. You do it because of the false sense of superiority created when you come out with these baseless one-liners and cause confusion, anger, chaos. You think you're superior because you don't follow the rules. You don't feel you need to follow the rules. You think you're above the rules. You think rules are created for just *some* people. You think rules are for the ignorant. You are not ignorant, therefore you feel obligated to disobey the rules to make a statement. I'll be the first to admit there are some hams who are clueless these days. But at least they've proven a certain level of knowledge by passing a simple test. Hams have shown they can meet *some* standard (albeit not much of a standard these days) compared to others in society. You seem to be a reasonably smart guy, why don't you get a ham license? Just because you're a ham doesn't mean you can't continue FREEBANDING. Getting a ham license will only increase your opportunities. You've shown you can talk the talk but for some reason refuse to walk the talk. Unless you can write something down and explain why you refuse to walk the talk, I have to come to the conclusion you can't walk the talk. The difference between CBers and Hams is patently obvious to anyone who tunes around HF. The next step is name calling. After that comes the vandalism. When I catch you vandalizing my property you will attack me physically. When I defend myself, your lawyer will say I violated your rights. You win, oh great one, you win. Go ahead, get in at least one more personal attack. Go ahead, tell me I can't count sentences. Go ahead, make another statement about how CBers are superior to hams. Go ahead, tell me the reason you don't get a ham license is because hams are "poopie-heads." Go ahead, insert, "I know you are but what am I?" in between each of the above paragraphs. Go ahead, ask me some stupid questions, and when I don't answer them, use them in future "one-liner" posts to show how ignorant hams are. SK Sincerely, with warmest regards and the best of intentions, Guy |
On Wed, 4 May 2005 19:29:25 -0400, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote: From: (Freeband*sucks) where can we find one? The technology is there,,you just have to -learn- it. Tell you what,,think about part 15 transceivers,,,,think about chips,..... now think about different modes,,outside the box....think about UHF.....now,,,if you still are confused, please explain why automatic hopping of freqs on the freeband is such a difficult concept for you. Since you can't seem to grasp this idea, forget about even casually mentioning digital sequencing to you,,,,you'd win the pool!!! : ) I've been watching this topic with some interest. IMHO the only true method of SS is the direct sequencing method. Frequency hopping sort of "cheats" the concept of a wideband and barely distinguishable SS system. Direct sequence is also more secure than FH. Nonetheless, frequency hopping is considered spread spectrum in today's marketplace. As far as using SS on 11 meters, well...... First off, there are no commercial CB radios made with this technology. Even hams have been slow to embrace it. That's not to say that enterprising experimenters have not played with it on 11 meters. Utilizing cordless phones and transverters might yield satisfactory results. I'm sure there may be a few that have. But it's hardly in widespread use. Dave "Sandbagger" http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj |
On Thu, 05 May 2005 07:06:44 -0500, Guy wrote:
I AmnotGeorgeBush wrote: From: am (Guy) Freeband sucks wrote: where can we find one? His version of spread-spectrum is turning that power microphone *way* up, that way, your signal spreads out. Sorry, had to get that in there... Guy Hey,,don't be sorry. You serve a valuable lesson: you reinforce the ignorance of select hammies who are licensed for communications but are clueless and incompetent when it comes to such. Perhaps that's why you feel the need to say such things about others, after all, if you were confident and satisfied in your abilities in life, there would be no need for such actions toward others. Carry on, my child. There it is... Without knowing anything about me, without knowing what I do for a living, without knowing the things I've done over the past three decades in the field of computers and radio, without knowing who I am, you make a huge jump in logic and begin to personnally attack me verbally. You couldn't just laugh with me and then drop it, could you? You've shown me that you do know something. You're able to convey meaning over these posts. The trouble is, the meaning you convey creates a sense of ill-will and *you know it*. You don't add anything of value to these posts. You've made it clear you are not a team player. You do it because of the false sense of superiority created when you come out with these baseless one-liners and cause confusion, anger, chaos. You think you're superior because you don't follow the rules. You don't feel you need to follow the rules. You think you're above the rules. You think rules are created for just *some* people. You think rules are for the ignorant. You are not ignorant, therefore you feel obligated to disobey the rules to make a statement. I'll be the first to admit there are some hams who are clueless these days. But at least they've proven a certain level of knowledge by passing a simple test. Hams have shown they can meet *some* standard (albeit not much of a standard these days) compared to others in society. You seem to be a reasonably smart guy, why don't you get a ham license? Just because you're a ham doesn't mean you can't continue FREEBANDING. Getting a ham license will only increase your opportunities. You've shown you can talk the talk but for some reason refuse to walk the talk. Unless you can write something down and explain why you refuse to walk the talk, I have to come to the conclusion you can't walk the talk. The difference between CBers and Hams is patently obvious to anyone who tunes around HF. The next step is name calling. After that comes the vandalism. When I catch you vandalizing my property you will attack me physically. When I defend myself, your lawyer will say I violated your rights. You win, oh great one, you win. Go ahead, get in at least one more personal attack. Go ahead, tell me I can't count sentences. Go ahead, make another statement about how CBers are superior to hams. Go ahead, tell me the reason you don't get a ham license is because hams are "poopie-heads." Go ahead, insert, "I know you are but what am I?" in between each of the above paragraphs. Go ahead, ask me some stupid questions, and when I don't answer them, use them in future "one-liner" posts to show how ignorant hams are. SK Sincerely, with warmest regards and the best of intentions, Gee for a new guy (no pun intended), you sure have a fairly accurate accounting of the situation here. Nicely put. Dave "Sandbagger" http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj |
"Dave Hall" wrote in message ... On Wed, 4 May 2005 19:29:25 -0400, (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote: From: (Freeband sucks) where can we find one? The technology is there,,you just have to -learn- it. Tell you what,,think about part 15 transceivers,,,,think about chips,..... now think about different modes,,outside the box....think about UHF.....now,,,if you still are confused, please explain why automatic hopping of freqs on the freeband is such a difficult concept for you. Since you can't seem to grasp this idea, forget about even casually mentioning digital sequencing to you,,,,you'd win the pool!!! : ) I've been watching this topic with some interest. IMHO the only true method of SS is the direct sequencing method. Frequency hopping sort of "cheats" the concept of a wideband and barely distinguishable SS system. Direct sequence is also more secure than FH. Nonetheless, frequency hopping is considered spread spectrum in today's marketplace. As far as using SS on 11 meters, well...... First off, there are no commercial CB radios made with this technology. Even hams have been slow to embrace it. That's not to say that enterprising experimenters have not played with it on 11 meters. Utilizing cordless phones and transverters might yield satisfactory results. I'm sure there may be a few that have. But it's hardly in widespread use. Dave "Sandbagger" http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj Hello, Dave The problem would be SWR with the requisite bandwidth. Of course, if anyone has any of those old Heathkit Cantennas :) There is a thought. 1.1 to 1 SWR from something like zero to 30 MHz. Not bad somewhat above too; just add oil and turn on your amplifier LOL. Best regards from Rochester, NY Jim - cooking at 3 megabaud |
From: am (Guy)
I AmnotGeorgeBush wrote: From: am (Guy) Freeband sucks wrote: where can we find one? His version of spread-spectrum is turning that power microphone *way* up, that way, your signal spreads out. Sorry, had to get that in there... Guy Hey,,don't be sorry. You serve a valuable lesson: you reinforce the ignorance of select hammies who are licensed for communications but are clueless and incompetent when it comes to such. Perhaps that's why you feel the need to say such things about others, after all, if you were confident and satisfied in your abilities in life, there would be no need for such actions toward others. Carry on, my child. There it is... Yep,,and you lobbed the first volley, Without knowing anything about me, without knowing what I do for a living, without knowing the things I've done over the past three decades in the field of computers and radio, without knowing who I am, you make a huge jump in logic and begin to personnally attack me verbally. Witout knowing anything about me, without knowing the things I;ve done over the past three decades, without knowing any damn thing about me, you make a huge jump in logic and begin to assume to know what and how I think. In addition, you ASSume I am of the "turn it all the way to the right" crowd. Stop throwing stones while you sit constipated in a glass house, hypocrite. You couldn't just laugh with me and then drop it, could you? You mean, take your unprovoked cut directed toward me in silence? That's always been your childish problem. Get over yourself. You've shown me that you do know something. You're able to convey meaning over these posts. The trouble is, the meaning you convey creates a sense of ill-will and *you know it*. What part of you assuming to know what I think regarding spread spectrum and turning the mic all the way up do you attribute to good will? Hyuk! You don't add anything of value to these posts. I'm about to,,,stay with me for a few more secs.. You've made it clear you are not a team player. Years ago. What's your point, besides the one atop your head? You do it because of the false sense of superiority created when you come out with these baseless one-liners ..you initiated it. Get over yourself and that small man syndrome may depart. and cause confusion, anger, chaos. You think you're superior because you don't follow the rules. There you go again with that jackass ignorance of ASSuming you know how I think. You're a freakin' hypocrite of the worst magnitude. You don't feel you need to follow the rules. Not at all,,I don't feel I need to explain myself to the likes of someone like you with a mentality that feels unprovoked and unsolicited barbs toward another by yourself constitute anything but ill-will. Note that to excuse your initated cut, you shrug it off as a joke. Now wipe your chin before the drool reaches the bib that catches your hypocrisy. You think you're above the rules. I'm merely adding to your self-image. Of course, you presenting yourself as knowing what and how I think is somehow done of your good will,,,,especially when taken into consideration your deliberate false misattributions that make you such a loser. You think rules are created for just *some* people. You think rules are for the ignorant. No at all. I think you are bordering on ignorant, by initiating a barb and defecating all over yourself when it was returned. You are not ignorant, therefore you feel obligated to disobey the rules to make a .statement. Perhaps that is default mode to your warped interpretation of things you can not grasp. I'll be the first to admit there are some hams who are clueless these days. But at least they've proven a certain level of knowledge by passing a simple test. Hams have shown they can meet *some* standard (albeit not much of a standard these days) compared to others in society. You seem to be a reasonably smart guy, why don't you get a ham license? Stay relevant. A hammie license has nothing to do with these pages or cb. Just because you're a ham doesn't mean you can't continue FREEBANDING. Check the archives. I've made that point on many occasions. Thing is, it's more difficult because too many jerkoffs like yourself are out there who feel when they are not given a satisfactory reason by others for their business and behavior, it's perfectly acceptable to conjure up reasons on your own and ASSume them of those who won't give you the time of day. That and your bull**** belief you are owed some sort of explanation for other's behavior. It's because of your ****ty attitude,,,,and THAT, will never change. Again, you are owed nothing,,,nada,,zip,,let alone a reason,for other's actions. Getting a ham license will only increase your opportunities. You've shown you can talk the .talk but for some reason refuse to walk the talk. I see your position, but it is ONLY because -you- continue to ASSume many conjured misbeliefs. Unless you can write something down and explain why you refuse to walk the talk, I have to come to the conclusion you can't walk the talk. And with this post, you have solidified beyond a doubt you are a hypocrite of the N'th magnitude. The difference between CBers and Hams is patently obvious to anyone who tunes around HF. Yet, you continue to express difficulty with such a conceptual difference by claiming you can not understand why one would not get a license. Again, and as always, this is YOUR problem you seek to foster on others who have nothing to do with your beliefs or demons. Oh,,wait a second, I'M your demon,,,LMAO! The next step is name calling. You mean aftre your little unprovoked insult you say is a joke that I should have laughed at? You're not that skilled in communications...here we go again.....you epitomize the fact that some of those licensed for communications are the least adept and skilled at such. Otherwise, you would never expect a "stranger" to insult another person of whcih they "know nothing of me" and expect them to laugh. In fact, the next step, as you say, is where I factly state you would never do such to a person on the street. Your demeanor affirms it, your communication skill reaffirms it. After that comes the vandalism. When I catch you vandalizing my property you will attack me physically. When I defend myself, your lawyer will say I violated your rights. Man, you must have really had your wings clipped in this group for you to ASSume so damn much of others you know nothing about...lmao! You win, oh great one, you win. Go ahead, get in at least one more personal attack. Go ahead, tell me I can't count sentences. Go ahead, make another statement about how CBers are superior to hams. Heheh..well, you are a liar, as well. Not one time in this group, ever, have I ever said cbers are superior to hammies, but your rigid position at trying to steadfastly misattribute your false ASSumptions to myself, illustrates what a jack off you are, also. Go ahead, tell me the reason you don't get a ham license is because hams are "poopie-heads." Go ahead, insert, "I know you are but what am I?" in between each of the above paragraphs. Go ahead, ask me some stupid questions, and when I don't answer them, use them in future "one-liner" posts to show how ignorant hams are. SK You are doing a bangup job all by yoursef illustrating the type hammie you are. But, to your misfortune and woe, not all hammies are asses like yourself. In fact, you are the rabid minority. Sincerely, with warmest regards and the best of intentions, Guy Ditto. |
From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Wed, 4 May 2005 19:29:25 -0400, (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote: From: (Freeband=A0sucks) where can we find one? - The technology is there,,you just have to -learn- it. Tell you what,,think about part 15 transceivers,,,,think about chips,..... now think about different modes,,outside the box....think about UHF.....now,,,if you still are confused, please explain why automatic hopping of freqs on the freeband is such a difficult concept for you. Since you can't seem to grasp this idea, forget about even casually mentioning digital sequencing to you,,,,you'd win the pool!!! : ) I've been watching this topic with some interest. IMHO the only true method of SS is the direct sequencing method. Yea,,that's what i meant when I said "digital" sequencing. Frequency hopping sort of "cheats" the concept of a wideband and barely distinguishable SS system. Yea,,I guess it could be seen that way,,,but,,why couldn't the technology be programmed to hop "wider" (for lack of a better term at the moment)? Direct sequence is also more secure than FH. I'm not up on the latest encryption technique regrading this technology, but take your word for it. But,,,why would a direct sequence (definite pattern) be more secire than a random pattern? Nonetheless, frequency hopping is considered spread spectrum in today's marketplace. Yep it is. As far as using SS on 11 meters, well...... First off, there are no commercial CB radios made with this technology. I never said there was. I said the technology was there and blew a gasket in a certain poster's gray matter and now he is all wrapped up in himself blathering incoherently about a cb radio when I referred the freeband. Even hams have been slow to embrace it. That's not to say that enterprising experimenters have not played with it on 11 .meters. BINGO! Utilizing cordless phones and transverters might yield satisfactory results. I'm sure there may be a few that have. But it's hardly in widespread use. Agreed. Dave ."Sandbagger" n3cvj |
I AmnotGeorgeBush wrote:
From: am (Guy) Freeband sucks wrote: where can we find one? His version of spread-spectrum is turning that power microphone *way* up, that way, your signal spreads out. Sorry, had to get that in there... Guy Hey,,don't be sorry. You serve a valuable lesson: you reinforce the ignorance of select hammies who are licensed for communications but are clueless and incompetent when it comes to such. Perhaps that's why you feel the need to say such things about others, after all, if you were confident and satisfied in your abilities in life, there would be no need for such actions toward others. Carry on, my child. There it is... Without knowing anything about me, without knowing what I do for a living, without knowing the things I've done over the past three decades in the field of computers and radio, without knowing who I am, you make a huge jump in logic and begin to personnally attack me verbally. You couldn't just laugh with me and then drop it, could you? You've shown me that you do know something. You're able to convey meaning over these posts. The trouble is, the meaning you convey creates a sense of ill-will and *you know it*. You don't add anything of value to these posts. You've made it clear you are not a team player. You do it because of the false sense of superiority created when you come out with these baseless one-liners and cause confusion, anger, chaos. You think you're superior because you don't follow the rules. You don't feel you need to follow the rules. You think you're above the rules. You think rules are created for just *some* people. You think rules are for the ignorant. You are not ignorant, therefore you feel obligated to disobey the rules to make a statement. I'll be the first to admit there are some hams who are clueless these days. But at least they've proven a certain level of knowledge by passing a simple test. Hams have shown they can meet *some* standard (albeit not much of a standard these days) compared to others in society. You seem to be a reasonably smart guy, why don't you get a ham license? Just because you're a ham doesn't mean you can't continue FREEBANDING. Getting a ham license will only increase your opportunities. You've shown you can talk the talk but for some reason refuse to walk the talk. Unless you can write something down and explain why you refuse to walk the talk, I have to come to the conclusion you can't walk the talk. The difference between CBers and Hams is patently obvious to anyone who tunes around HF. The next step is name calling. After that comes the vandalism. When I catch you vandalizing my property you will attack me physically. When I defend myself, your lawyer will say I violated your rights. You win, oh great one, you win. Go ahead, get in at least one more personal attack. Go ahead, tell me I can't count sentences. Go ahead, make another statement about how CBers are superior to hams. Go ahead, tell me the reason you don't get a ham license is because hams are "poopie-heads." Go ahead, insert, "I know you are but what am I?" in between each of the above paragraphs. Go ahead, ask me some stupid questions, and when I don't answer them, use them in future "one-liner" posts to show how ignorant hams are. SK Sincerely, with warmest regards and the best of intentions, Guy Guy, IAmNotGeorgeBush aka is the Al Swearingen of rec.radio.cb. |
On Thu, 5 May 2005 14:23:24 -0400, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote: From: (DaveĀ*Hall) On Wed, 4 May 2005 19:29:25 -0400, (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote: From: (FreebandĀ*sucks) where can we find one? - The technology is there,,you just have to -learn- it. Tell you what,,think about part 15 transceivers,,,,think about chips,..... now think about different modes,,outside the box....think about UHF.....now,,,if you still are confused, please explain why automatic hopping of freqs on the freeband is such a difficult concept for you. Since you can't seem to grasp this idea, forget about even casually mentioning digital sequencing to you,,,,you'd win the pool!!! : ) I've been watching this topic with some interest. IMHO the only true method of SS is the direct sequencing method. Yea,,that's what i meant when I said "digital" sequencing. Frequency hopping sort of "cheats" the concept of a wideband and barely distinguishable SS system. Yea,,I guess it could be seen that way,,,but,,why couldn't the technology be programmed to hop "wider" (for lack of a better term at the moment)? Direct sequence is also more secure than FH. I'm not up on the latest encryption technique regrading this technology, but take your word for it. But,,,why would a direct sequence (definite pattern) be more secire than a random pattern? Nonetheless, frequency hopping is considered spread spectrum in today's marketplace. Yep it is. As far as using SS on 11 meters, well...... First off, there are no commercial CB radios made with this technology. I never said there was. I said the technology was there and blew a gasket in a certain poster's gray matter and now he is all wrapped up in himself blathering incoherently about a cb radio when I referred the freeband. really? my original post that you responded too said nothing about freeband. in fact it said 11 meter cb spread spectrum? i don't think so. nothing about freeband there your response was Digital Spread has another name when applied to such. Ask an upperclassman hammie to elmer you with this difficulty you profess. hmm, nothing about freeband from you either. the only gasket you blew in someones gray matter was your own. and now you are so wrapped up in yourself bathering about freeband. blather in little boy |
On Thu, 5 May 2005 14:15:57 -0400, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote: From: am (Guy) I AmnotGeorgeBush wrote: From: am (Guy) Freeband sucks wrote: where can we find one? His version of spread-spectrum is turning that power microphone *way* up, that way, your signal spreads out. Sorry, had to get that in there... Guy Hey,,don't be sorry. You serve a valuable lesson: you reinforce the ignorance of select hammies who are licensed for communications but are clueless and incompetent when it comes to such. Perhaps that's why you feel the need to say such things about others, after all, if you were confident and satisfied in your abilities in life, there would be no need for such actions toward others. Carry on, my child. There it is... Yep,,and you lobbed the first volley, Without knowing anything about me, without knowing what I do for a living, without knowing the things I've done over the past three decades in the field of computers and radio, without knowing who I am, you make a huge jump in logic and begin to personnally attack me verbally. Witout knowing anything about me, without knowing the things I;ve done over the past three decades, without knowing any damn thing about me, you make a huge jump in logic and begin to assume to know what and how I think. In addition, you ASSume I am of the "turn it all the way to the right" crowd. Stop throwing stones while you sit constipated in a glass house, hypocrite. You couldn't just laugh with me and then drop it, could you? You mean, take your unprovoked cut directed toward me in silence? That's always been your childish problem. Get over yourself. You've shown me that you do know something. You're able to convey meaning over these posts. The trouble is, the meaning you convey creates a sense of ill-will and *you know it*. What part of you assuming to know what I think regarding spread spectrum and turning the mic all the way up do you attribute to good will? Hyuk! You don't add anything of value to these posts. I'm about to,,,stay with me for a few more secs.. You've made it clear you are not a team player. Years ago. What's your point, besides the one atop your head? You do it because of the false sense of superiority created when you come out with these baseless one-liners .you initiated it. Get over yourself and that small man syndrome may depart. and cause confusion, anger, chaos. You think you're superior because you don't follow the rules. There you go again with that jackass ignorance of ASSuming you know how I think. You're a freakin' hypocrite of the worst magnitude. You don't feel you need to follow the rules. Not at all,,I don't feel I need to explain myself to the likes of someone like you with a mentality that feels unprovoked and unsolicited barbs toward another by yourself constitute anything but ill-will. Note that to excuse your initated cut, you shrug it off as a joke. Now wipe your chin before the drool reaches the bib that catches your hypocrisy. You think you're above the rules. I'm merely adding to your self-image. Of course, you presenting yourself as knowing what and how I think is somehow done of your good will,,,,especially when taken into consideration your deliberate false misattributions that make you such a loser. You think rules are created for just *some* people. You think rules are for the ignorant. No at all. I think you are bordering on ignorant, by initiating a barb and defecating all over yourself when it was returned. You are not ignorant, therefore you feel obligated to disobey the rules to make a .statement. Perhaps that is default mode to your warped interpretation of things you can not grasp. I'll be the first to admit there are some hams who are clueless these days. But at least they've proven a certain level of knowledge by passing a simple test. Hams have shown they can meet *some* standard (albeit not much of a standard these days) compared to others in society. You seem to be a reasonably smart guy, why don't you get a ham license? Stay relevant. A hammie license has nothing to do with these pages or cb. Just because you're a ham doesn't mean you can't continue FREEBANDING. Check the archives. I've made that point on many occasions. Thing is, it's more difficult because too many jerkoffs like yourself are out there who feel when they are not given a satisfactory reason by others for their business and behavior, it's perfectly acceptable to conjure up reasons on your own and ASSume them of those who won't give you the time of day. That and your bull**** belief you are owed some sort of explanation for other's behavior. It's because of your ****ty attitude,,,,and THAT, will never change. Again, you are owed nothing,,,nada,,zip,,let alone a reason,for other's actions. Getting a ham license will only increase your opportunities. You've shown you can talk the .talk but for some reason refuse to walk the talk. I see your position, but it is ONLY because -you- continue to ASSume many conjured misbeliefs. Unless you can write something down and explain why you refuse to walk the talk, I have to come to the conclusion you can't walk the talk. And with this post, you have solidified beyond a doubt you are a hypocrite of the N'th magnitude. The difference between CBers and Hams is patently obvious to anyone who tunes around HF. Yet, you continue to express difficulty with such a conceptual difference by claiming you can not understand why one would not get a license. Again, and as always, this is YOUR problem you seek to foster on others who have nothing to do with your beliefs or demons. Oh,,wait a second, I'M your demon,,,LMAO! The next step is name calling. You mean aftre your little unprovoked insult you say is a joke that I should have laughed at? You're not that skilled in communications...here we go again.....you epitomize the fact that some of those licensed for communications are the least adept and skilled at such. Otherwise, you would never expect a "stranger" to insult another person of whcih they "know nothing of me" and expect them to laugh. In fact, the next step, as you say, is where I factly state you would never do such to a person on the street. Your demeanor affirms it, your communication skill reaffirms it. After that comes the vandalism. When I catch you vandalizing my property you will attack me physically. When I defend myself, your lawyer will say I violated your rights. Man, you must have really had your wings clipped in this group for you to ASSume so damn much of others you know nothing about...lmao! You win, oh great one, you win. Go ahead, get in at least one more personal attack. Go ahead, tell me I can't count sentences. Go ahead, make another statement about how CBers are superior to hams. Heheh..well, you are a liar, as well. Not one time in this group, ever, have I ever said cbers are superior to hammies, but your rigid position at trying to steadfastly misattribute your false ASSumptions to myself, illustrates what a jack off you are, also. Go ahead, tell me the reason you don't get a ham license is because hams are "poopie-heads." Go ahead, insert, "I know you are but what am I?" in between each of the above paragraphs. Go ahead, ask me some stupid questions, and when I don't answer them, use them in future "one-liner" posts to show how ignorant hams are. SK You are doing a bangup job all by yoursef illustrating the type hammie you are. But, to your misfortune and woe, not all hammies are asses like yourself. In fact, you are the rabid minority. Sincerely, with warmest regards and the best of intentions, Guy Ditto. now where is that spread spectrum 11 meter cb radio? i said they didn't exist, you blew a hemroid over it. if you dont know say so. |
Dave Hall wrote:
On Thu, 05 May 2005 07:06:44 -0500, Guy wrote: I AmnotGeorgeBush wrote: From: am (Guy) Freeband sucks wrote: where can we find one? His version of spread-spectrum is turning that power microphone *way* up, that way, your signal spreads out. Sorry, had to get that in there... Guy Hey,,don't be sorry. You serve a valuable lesson: you reinforce the ignorance of select hammies who are licensed for communications but are clueless and incompetent when it comes to such. Perhaps that's why you feel the need to say such things about others, after all, if you were confident and satisfied in your abilities in life, there would be no need for such actions toward others. Carry on, my child. There it is... Without knowing anything about me, without knowing what I do for a living, without knowing the things I've done over the past three decades in the field of computers and radio, without knowing who I am, you make a huge jump in logic and begin to personnally attack me verbally. You couldn't just laugh with me and then drop it, could you? You've shown me that you do know something. You're able to convey meaning over these posts. The trouble is, the meaning you convey creates a sense of ill-will and *you know it*. You don't add anything of value to these posts. You've made it clear you are not a team player. You do it because of the false sense of superiority created when you come out with these baseless one-liners and cause confusion, anger, chaos. You think you're superior because you don't follow the rules. You don't feel you need to follow the rules. You think you're above the rules. You think rules are created for just *some* people. You think rules are for the ignorant. You are not ignorant, therefore you feel obligated to disobey the rules to make a statement. I'll be the first to admit there are some hams who are clueless these days. But at least they've proven a certain level of knowledge by passing a simple test. Hams have shown they can meet *some* standard (albeit not much of a standard these days) compared to others in society. You seem to be a reasonably smart guy, why don't you get a ham license? Just because you're a ham doesn't mean you can't continue FREEBANDING. Getting a ham license will only increase your opportunities. You've shown you can talk the talk but for some reason refuse to walk the talk. Unless you can write something down and explain why you refuse to walk the talk, I have to come to the conclusion you can't walk the talk. The difference between CBers and Hams is patently obvious to anyone who tunes around HF. The next step is name calling. After that comes the vandalism. When I catch you vandalizing my property you will attack me physically. When I defend myself, your lawyer will say I violated your rights. You win, oh great one, you win. Go ahead, get in at least one more personal attack. Go ahead, tell me I can't count sentences. Go ahead, make another statement about how CBers are superior to hams. Go ahead, tell me the reason you don't get a ham license is because hams are "poopie-heads." Go ahead, insert, "I know you are but what am I?" in between each of the above paragraphs. Go ahead, ask me some stupid questions, and when I don't answer them, use them in future "one-liner" posts to show how ignorant hams are. SK Sincerely, with warmest regards and the best of intentions, Gee for a new guy (no pun intended), you sure have a fairly accurate accounting of the situation here. Nicely put. Dave "Sandbagger" http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj Thanks. He goes on to prove a couple of my points, like, accusing me of doing what he does, calling me names, demonstrating he can't read what I wrote, not claiming to be what he has claimed to be in other posts, cursing at me, etc. If you read it, you can almost feel that vein in his forehead about to explode. I'll lay off him for a while. He's so predictable, it's not even fun. Thanks once again. Guy |
"Jim Hampton" wrote:
There is a thought. 1.1 to 1 SWR from something like zero to 30 MHz. Not bad somewhat above too; just add oil and turn on your amplifier LOL. Sparrow never tasted so good. |
"Steveo" wrote in message ... "Jim Hampton" wrote: There is a thought. 1.1 to 1 SWR from something like zero to 30 MHz. Not bad somewhat above too; just add oil and turn on your amplifier LOL. Sparrow never tasted so good. Is that an African Sparrow carrying a coconut? Landshark -- Treat people as if they were what they ought to be and you will help them become what they are capable of becoming. |
On Thu, 05 May 2005 18:09:39 GMT, "Jim Hampton"
wrote in : snip Hello, Dave The problem would be SWR with the requisite bandwidth. Of course, if anyone has any of those old Heathkit Cantennas :) Or a discone. That's one of the preferred commercial antennas for SS on VHF/UHF. SWR isn't flat but it's low over a 10:1 range of spectrum. The only problem is the poor gain. I wonder if anyone has ever tried to build a phased discone array..... ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
From: (Freeband=A0sucks)
On Thu, 5 May 2005 14:23:24 -0400, (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote: From: (Dave=C2=A0Hall) On Wed, 4 May 2005 19:29:25 -0400, (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote: From: (Freeband=C2=A0sucks) The technology is there,,you just have to -learn- it. Tell you what,,think about part 15 transceivers,,,,think about chips,..... now think about different modes,,outside the box....think about UHF.....now,,,if you still are confused, please explain why automatic hopping of freqs on the freeband is such a difficult concept for you. Since you can't seem to grasp this idea, forget about even casually mentioning digital sequencing to you,,,,you'd win the pool!!! : ) (I've been watching this topic with some interest. IMHO the only true method of SS is the direct sequencing method. ) Yea,,that's what i meant when I said "digital" sequencing. (Frequency hopping sort of "cheats" the concept of a wideband and barely distinguishable SS system. ) Yea,,I guess it could be seen that way,,,but,,why couldn't the technology be programmed to hop "wider" (for lack of a better term at the moment)? (Direct sequence is also more secure than FH.) I'm not up on the latest encryption technique regarding this technology, but take your word for it. But,,,why would a direct sequence (definite pattern) be more secure than a random pattern? (Nonetheless, frequency hopping is considered spread spectrum in today's marketplace.) Yep it is. (As far as using SS on 11 meters, well...... First off, there are no commercial CB radios made with this technology.) I never said there was. I said the technology was there and blew a gasket in a certain poster's gray matter and now he is all wrapped up in himself blathering incoherently about a cb radio when I referred the freeband. really? Really. my original post that you responded too said nothing about freeband. LMAO,what a lying POS you are...that's why you changed the topic header,,so the post I replied to regarding freeband would be forgot...what a CARD! in fact it said 11 meter cb spread spectrum? i don't think so. nothing about freeband there Only because you suffer a great moronic communcation deficit..as it is there plainly for the entire world to see, but you, for some odd reason, express magnicent failure regarding your memory, intellect, and communication skill. Here it is again,,,open wide: From: Freeband sucks Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb Subject: CB Radio is MUCH more valuable than Amateur Radio... References: 1115140548.1a320617e93e5875545e89b2be1b9aeb@bubba news X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dutf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 16 NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 17:25:30 EST Message-ID: 1115159130.9ed8124b9af7d68c5235b286d05c6b91@bubba news X-Abuse-Report: http://www.usenetabuse.com X-Abuse-Notes: Abuse reports must be submited via the usenetabuse.com portal listed above. X-Abuse-Notes2: Reports sent via any other method will not be processed. X-Abuse-Notes3: Any other abuse reporting headers in this article are fraudulent. X-Orginal-Message-ID: Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 11:19:25 -0500 On Tue, 3 May 2005 17:00:54 -0400, (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote: From: (Freeband=C2=A0sucks) On Tue, 3 May 2005 12:54:05 -0400, "Stu" wrote: Mobile spread-spectrum ops are virtually impossible to locate. Stu freebanders don't use spread spectrum Others learn what they do not know. You deny. Carry on and off you go, you magnificent failure, you!!. : )~ |
"Landshark" wrote:
"Steveo" wrote in message ... "Jim Hampton" wrote: There is a thought. 1.1 to 1 SWR from something like zero to 30 MHz. Not bad somewhat above too; just add oil and turn on your amplifier LOL. Sparrow never tasted so good. Is that an African Sparrow carrying a coconut? Landshark Amazon parrot bringing rum! |
On Fri, 6 May 2005 17:30:43 -0400, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote: my original post that you responded too said nothing about freeband. LMAO,what a lying POS you are...that's why you changed the topic header,,so the post I replied to regarding freeband would be forgot...what a CARD! LMAO,what a lying POS you are...thats why you changed the topic to freeband. so the post that i made regarding 11 meters would be forgot..what a card! in fact it said 11 meter cb spread spectrum? i don't think so. nothing about freeband there Only because you suffer a great moronic communcation deficit..as it is there plainly for the entire world to see, but you, for some odd reason, express magnicent failure regarding your memory, intellect, and communication skill. Here it is again,,,open wide: you suffer from moronic communication deficet, there was nothing there about freeband. so here it is again,open wide little boy: __________________________________________________ __________ From: (FreebandĀ*sucks) On Tue, 3 May 2005 12:52:19 -0400, "Stu" wrote: "Cmd Buzz Corey" wrote in message ... Frank Gilliland wrote: Now that's interesting. I didn't know that the ARRL was a government supported organization, or that REACT was -not- supported. Got a link that tells how much funding each organization receives and from where? snip - The federal government, NORAD and Homeland Security, have ham radio in their planning for emergency comms, CB isn't even a consideration. - Not sure about A3E & J3E modes, but at least two advanced CB modes do figure in to national plans. They are CB spread-spectrum and packet. Stu 11 meter cb spread spectrum? i don't think so. Digital Spread has another name when applied to such. Ask an upperclassman hammie to elmer you with this difficulty you profess. _____________________________________________ now off you go little boy,thanks for playing, next time come back with your thinking cap on! |
From: (Freeband=A0sucks)
On Thu, 5 May 2005 14:23:24 -0400, (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote: From: (Dave=C2=A0Hall) On Wed, 4 May 2005 19:29:25 -0400, (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote: From: (Freeband=C2=A0sucks) The technology is there,,you just have to -learn- it. Tell you what,,think about part 15 transceivers,,,,think about chips,..... now think about different modes,,outside the box....think about UHF.....now,,,if you still are confused, please explain why automatic hopping of freqs on the freeband is such a difficult concept for you. Since you can't seem to grasp this idea, forget about even casually mentioning digital sequencing to you,,,,you'd win the pool!!! : ) (I've been watching this topic with some interest. IMHO the only true method of SS is the direct sequencing method. ) Yea,,that's what i meant when I said "digital" sequencing. (Frequency hopping sort of "cheats" the concept of a wideband and barely distinguishable SS system. ) Yea,,I guess it could be seen that way,,,but,,why couldn't the technology be programmed to hop "wider" (for lack of a better term at the moment)? (Direct sequence is also more secure than FH.) I'm not up on the latest encryption technique regarding this technology, but take your word for it. But,,,why would a direct sequence (definite pattern) be more secure than a random pattern? (Nonetheless, frequency hopping is considered spread spectrum in today's marketplace.) Yep it is. (As far as using SS on 11 meters, well...... First off, there are no commercial CB radios made with this technology.) I never said there was. I said the technology was there and blew a gasket in a certain poster's gray matter and now he is all wrapped up in himself blathering incoherently about a cb radio when I referred the freeband. really? Really. my original post that you responded too said nothing about freeband. LMAO,what a lying POS you are...that's why you changed the topic header,,so the post I replied to regarding freeband would be forgot...what a CARD! in fact it said 11 meter cb spread spectrum? i don't think so. nothing about freeband there Only because you suffer a great moronic communcation deficit..as it is there plainly for the entire world to see, but you, for some odd reason, express magnicent failure regarding your memory, intellect, and communication skill. Here it is again,,,open wide: From: Freeband sucks Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb Subject: CB Radio is MUCH more valuable than Amateur Radio... References: 1115140548.1a320617e93e5875545e89b2be1b9aeb@bubba news X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dutf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 16 NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 17:25:30 EST Message-ID: 1115159130.9ed8124b9af7d68c5235b286d05c6b91@bubba news X-Abuse-Report: http://www.usenetabuse.com X-Abuse-Notes: Abuse reports must be submited via the usenetabuse.com portal listed above. X-Abuse-Notes2: Reports sent via any other method will not be processed. X-Abuse-Notes3: Any other abuse reporting headers in this article are fraudulent. X-Orginal-Message-ID: Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 11:19:25 -0500 On Tue, 3 May 2005 17:00:54 -0400, (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote: From: (Freeband=C2=A0sucks) On Tue, 3 May 2005 12:54:05 -0400, "Stu" wrote: Mobile spread-spectrum ops are virtually impossible to locate. Stu freebanders don't use spread spectrum Others learn what they do not know. You deny. Carry on and off you go, you magnificent failure, you!!. : )~ Spread spectrum activity on 11 meter and freeband? Either there is or there isn't. If there is, post the proof. If there isn't, then STFU and stop your idiotic attempts at "spin". |
"Steveo" wrote in message ... "Landshark" wrote: "Steveo" wrote in message ... "Jim Hampton" wrote: There is a thought. 1.1 to 1 SWR from something like zero to 30 MHz. Not bad somewhat above too; just add oil and turn on your amplifier LOL. Sparrow never tasted so good. Is that an African Sparrow carrying a coconut? Landshark Amazon parrot bringing rum! Damn Parrot Heads................ Cheese Burger in Paradise............. Landshark -- Some of them are living an illusion Bounded by the darkness of their minds, In their eyes it's nation against nation, With racial pride, sad hearts they hide, Thinking only of themselves, They shun the light, They think they're right Living in the empty shells. |
"Landshark" wrote:
"Steveo" wrote in message ... "Landshark" wrote: "Steveo" wrote in message ... "Jim Hampton" wrote: There is a thought. 1.1 to 1 SWR from something like zero to 30 MHz. Not bad somewhat above too; just add oil and turn on your amplifier LOL. Sparrow never tasted so good. Is that an African Sparrow carrying a coconut? Landshark Amazon parrot bringing rum! Damn Parrot Heads................ Cheese Burger in Paradise............. Landshark Boat drinks! |
Guy wrote:
I AmnotGeorgeBush wrote: From: am (Guy) Freeband sucks wrote: where can we find one? His version of spread-spectrum is turning that power microphone *way* up, that way, your signal spreads out. Sorry, had to get that in there... Guy Hey,,don't be sorry. You serve a valuable lesson: you reinforce the ignorance of select hammies who are licensed for communications but are clueless and incompetent when it comes to such. Perhaps that's why you feel the need to say such things about others, after all, if you were confident and satisfied in your abilities in life, there would be no need for such actions toward others. Carry on, my child. There it is... Without knowing anything about me, without knowing what I do for a living, without knowing the things I've done over the past three decades in the field of computers and radio, without knowing who I am, you make a huge jump in logic and begin to personnally attack me verbally. You couldn't just laugh with me and then drop it, could you? You've shown me that you do know something. You're able to convey meaning over these posts. The trouble is, the meaning you convey creates a sense of ill-will and *you know it*. You don't add anything of value to these posts. You've made it clear you are not a team player. You do it because of the false sense of superiority created when you come out with these baseless one-liners and cause confusion, anger, chaos. You think you're superior because you don't follow the rules. You don't feel you need to follow the rules. You think you're above the rules. You think rules are created for just *some* people. You think rules are for the ignorant. You are not ignorant, therefore you feel obligated to disobey the rules to make a statement. I'll be the first to admit there are some hams who are clueless these days. But at least they've proven a certain level of knowledge by passing a simple test. Hams have shown they can meet *some* standard (albeit not much of a standard these days) compared to others in society. You seem to be a reasonably smart guy, why don't you get a ham license? Just because you're a ham doesn't mean you can't continue FREEBANDING. Getting a ham license will only increase your opportunities. You've shown you can talk the talk but for some reason refuse to walk the talk. Unless you can write something down and explain why you refuse to walk the talk, I have to come to the conclusion you can't walk the talk. The difference between CBers and Hams is patently obvious to anyone who tunes around HF. The next step is name calling. After that comes the vandalism. When I catch you vandalizing my property you will attack me physically. When I defend myself, your lawyer will say I violated your rights. You win, oh great one, you win. Go ahead, get in at least one more personal attack. Go ahead, tell me I can't count sentences. Go ahead, make another statement about how CBers are superior to hams. Go ahead, tell me the reason you don't get a ham license is because hams are "poopie-heads." Go ahead, insert, "I know you are but what am I?" in between each of the above paragraphs. Go ahead, ask me some stupid questions, and when I don't answer them, use them in future "one-liner" posts to show how ignorant hams are. SK Sincerely, with warmest regards and the best of intentions, Guy Damn Guy. A simple "**** You" would have suficed, wouldn't it? But then again, it wouldn't have allowed you to show how intelligent and witty you are, right? Yep. You are the man. Jeff |
"Steveo" wrote in message ... "Landshark" wrote: "Steveo" wrote in message ... "Landshark" wrote: "Steveo" wrote in message ... "Jim Hampton" wrote: There is a thought. 1.1 to 1 SWR from something like zero to 30 MHz. Not bad somewhat above too; just add oil and turn on your amplifier LOL. Sparrow never tasted so good. Is that an African Sparrow carrying a coconut? Landshark Amazon parrot bringing rum! Damn Parrot Heads................ Cheese Burger in Paradise............. Landshark Boat drinks! AAAAAhhhhhhh, sounds of Cabo ;-) Landshark -- __ o /' ) /' ( , __/' ) .' `; o _.-~~~~' ``---..__ .' ; _.--' b) LANDSHARK ``--...____. .' ( _. )). `-._ `\|\|\|\|)-.....___.- `-. __...--'-.'. `---......____...---`.___.'----... .' `.; `-` ` |
From: =A0=A0 Freeband sucks Group: =A0=A0 rec.radio.cb,rec.radio.amateur.policy Subject: =A0=A0 ATTN: I AmnotGeorgeBush,tell us about spread spectrum 11 meter ... NNTP-Posting-Date: =A0=A0 Fri, May 6, 2005, 6:54pm (EDT-1) X-Abuse-Report: =A0=A0 http://www.usenetabuse.com X-Abuse-Notes: =A0=A0 Abuse reports must be submited via the usenetabuse.com portal listed above. X-Abuse-Notes2: =A0=A0 Reports sent via any other method will not be processed. X-Abuse-Notes3: =A0=A0 Any other abuse reporting headers in this article are fraudulent. X-Orginal-Message-ID: =A0=A0 Date: =A0=A0 Fri, May 6, 2005, 7:04pm (EDT-1) On Fri, 6 May 2005 17:30:43 -0400, (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote: my original post that you responded too said nothing about freeband. LMAO,what a lying POS you are...that's why you changed the topic header,,so the post I replied to regarding freeband would be forgot...what a CARD! in fact it said 11 meter cb spread spectrum? i don't think so. nothing about freeband there Only because you suffer a great moronic communcation deficit..as it is there plainly for the entire world to see, but you, for some odd reason, express magnicent failure regarding your memory, intellect, and communication skill. Here it is again,,,open wide: From: Freeband sucks That's you. From: Freeband sucks Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb Subject: CB Radio is MUCH more valuable than Amateur Radio... References: 1115140548.1a320617e93e5875545e89b2be1b9aeb@bubba news X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dutf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 16 NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 17:25:30 EST Message-ID: 1115159130.9ed8124b9af7d68c5235b286d05c6b91@bubba news X-Abuse-Report: http://www.usenetabuse.com X-Abuse-Notes: Abuse reports must be submited via the usenetabuse.com portal listed above. X-Abuse-Notes2: Reports sent via any other method will not be processed. X-Abuse-Notes3: Any other abuse reporting headers in this article are fraudulent. X-Orginal-Message-ID: Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 11:19:25 -0500 On Tue, 3 May 2005 17:00:54 -0400, (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote: From: (Freeband=C2=A0sucks) On Tue, 3 May 2005 12:54:05 -0400, "Stu" wrote: Mobile spread-spectrum ops are virtually impossible to locate. Stu freebanders don't use spread spectrum Others learn what they do not know. You deny. Carry on and off you go, you magnificent failure, you!!. : )~ ---- From: (Freeband=C2=A0sucks) On Tue, 3 May 2005 12:52:19 -0400, "Stu" wrote: "Cmd Buzz Corey" wrote in message ... Frank Gilliland wrote: (Now that's interesting. I didn't know that the ARRL was a government supported organization, or that REACT was -not- supported. Got a link that tells how much funding each organization receives and from where? ) - "The federal government, NORAD and Homeland Security, have ham radio in their planning for emergency comms, CB isn't even a consideration. " - " They are CB spread-spectrum and packet. Stu " 11 meter cb spread spectrum? i don't think so. Digital Spread has another name when applied to such. Ask an upperclassman hammie to elmer you with this difficulty you profess. Now off you go little boy,thanks for playing, next time come back with your thinking cap on, as digital spread, has most certainly been applied to -such- ("such" being 11 meter which encompasses the freeband). Again, what you don''t know has always been your worst nightmare. Only one in this group suffers from such a great deficiency that results in him denying the possibilities on which he is ignorant regarding,,well, everything. The conversation alluded to the freeband long before you began gagging on your self-imposed term of "11 meter cb". Now, please vomit your regurgitative douche in another direction. You've been santized and your cleaning lesson is over. |
I AmnotGeorgeBush wrote:
Only because you suffer a great moronic communcation deficit..as it is there plainly for the entire world to see, but you, for some odd reason, express magnicent failure regarding your memory, intellect, and communication skill. Here it is again,,,open wide: Boy, everyone who disagrees with you has a communications deficit, don't they? How can we all be that stupid? How can you be the only one who knows how to communicate? How is it that you are the only one who has any memory, intellect, and communication skills? You've been asked a very simple question "I AmnotGeorgeBush." I have not seen you answer it for several days now. "What we have here is a failure to communicate." Guy |
On Tue, 10 May 2005 20:28:10 -0500, Guy wrote:
I AmnotGeorgeBush wrote: Only because you suffer a great moronic communcation deficit..as it is there plainly for the entire world to see, but you, for some odd reason, express magnicent failure regarding your memory, intellect, and communication skill. Here it is again,,,open wide: Boy, everyone who disagrees with you has a communications deficit, don't they? How can we all be that stupid? How can you be the only one who knows how to communicate? How is it that you are the only one who has any memory, intellect, and communication skills? You've been asked a very simple question "I AmnotGeorgeBush." I have not seen you answer it for several days now. "What we have here is a failure to communicate." Guy Now you will be accused of being a sock puppet of mine..... Dave "Sandbagger" http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj |
|
|
On Wed, 11 May 2005 11:49:00 -0400, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote: From: am (Guy) You've been asked a very simple question "I AmnotGeorgeBush." A question regarding a term I never employed. LMAO,,,such illustrates your failures in communcations. You should look to the one who used the term for such questions, not one who never used the term. See, this is illustrates perfectly your inaibilties regarding proper communication skill. it is a term that you were all too happy to respond to mr. communication skills On Tue, 03 May 2005 12:24:07 -0500, Freeband sucks wrote: 11 meter cb spread spectrum? i don't think so. On Tue, 3 May 2005 16:59:54 -0400, (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote: Digital Spread has another name when applied to such. Ask an upperclassman hammie to elmer you with this difficulty you profess. so yes, you did use in your quoted response.LMAO 11 meter cb didgital spread spectrum has another name when applied to such (at least according to you) what is it? |
If anyone would know about warm fuzzies, strokes, and fanny pinching
among men, it would be twitlips. Ask him about what he does with FUGGLY at the truckstops. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:27 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com