George:

So then, Bush is our enemy--it is our fault radical muslims wish to destroy
American property--and kill Americans.

You want to tie our militaries hands over the fact that they didn't have
these weapons--which we got there first and stopped them from getting them.
Your suggestion it that we should have waited until they had them--then
instead of smashing our own planes into those buildings they could have been
much more successful with those weapons (chemical, biological, nuclear.)
And then, we would have a right to stop them...

You argument that Iraq and Sadam were not Bin Laden is shallow--they have
the oil money which financed him, they hold the same radical ideas--this is
enough for them to die... I am not pleased with Saudi Arabia...

I am one would support our LARGEST nuclear bomb dropped square in the middle
of Iran--if they even threaten to be a threat to us... and if it would only
save one innocent American life...

Warmest regards,
John

"I AmnotGeorgeBush" wrote in message
...
From: (John Smith)
Let's get real, there are two of our VERY

LARGE, VERY expensive buildings missing in
New York.

In part because of the Bush admins failures. The failures listed below
all came after 911 and are independent of the acts against the US.

Thousands of Americans died in those

buildings.

See above.

There was a large hole in our pentagon, site

.of our most holy protection for this land.


Holy? Duuuuude,,,,

One plane was headed towards the

Whitehouse, another of our most holy political

sites--




"Holy political"?

before it was downed. There are a few

airplanes of ours which were destroyed in

these attacts--and American lives lost on each
and everyone of these aircraft.

Anyone who does not want to go after those

who did THAT, with every resource at our

disposal, is either a coward, terrorist

themselves, or an idiot.


And only an idiot would believe BL is in Iraq, or that Iraq had anything
to do with what you described above.
But what you did here is what Bush often does, he uses the term "Iraq"
when speaking of 911 and BL, but I will admit, he has stopped doing this
since the 911 Report. Now if only his legions of sheople can manage to
emulate him in this regard.....

And, the radical muslims will point blank tell

you that you have three choices--join them, be
enslaved by them or die.


Muslims don't run this country, and the oppression you speak of is not
limited to just the Muslim world or Iraq .

Any rational person would choose a

fourth--they die!


Fortunately, we were never in such a position.

We simply don't have a choice in this matter...

What matter is that? Going after BL and those responsible for 911, or
the war in Iraq? Even Bush no longer tries to employ such long ago
defeated rhetoric.

Warmest regards,

John



From the Times wires:
Before the Iraq invasion, the Bush administration asserted that Iraq
possessed chemical and biological weapons and was developing nuclear
weapons. Officials also allege Iraq was working on prohibited long-range
missiles and drones that could disperse biological agents. The
presidential intelligene commison examined each of the US intelligence
community's prewar assertions on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction and
reached these conclusions:


Nuclear Weapons: Wrong
Analysts wrongly interpreted the purpose of some metal tubes Iraq tried
to import, arguing they were for centrifuges to enrich uranium when they
were for conventional artillery rockets. Other imports of materials with
more than one potential use were also similarily misinterpreted.



Biological Weapons: Wrong
Agencies trusted several Iraqi defectors who were lying, ignoring
inconsistencies in their statements and other warning signs that these
defectors were providing false information.



Chemical Weapons: WRONG
The intelligence committe drew its conclusions from satellite photos of
trucks and buildings and other sources that were suspicious but
ultimately ambiguous, and trusted human sources who made claims that
Hussein had accomplished things that are technically impossiible.



WMD-Armed Drones: Wrong
Analysts concluded the drones were for WMD based on limited information;
Iraq;s drones turned out to be for reconnaissance.


Hussein's Intentions: Wrong
Intelligence agencies did not seriously consider Hussein could have
given up his WMD ambitions and destroyed his stockpiles. Although
several intel sources asserted before the war that Iraq did not have any
WMD, US analysts have regarded this as disinformation.
End of Times wire report.
--