Repeater back up on 27.620
 

Some of the freeband gang been having at it with yet another repeater
on the Penna/NY line. When they first launched it, there were some
technical audio issues, but they seem to have straightened them out
since then. This repeater appears to be among the new "roving" repeaters
the clubs are moving from place to place in order to avoid detection.
Enraged hammies, send your foaming-at-the-mouth complaints to the FCC
flunky field agent in Texas. Tell 'em I sent ya' for good measure!




"**** the FCC! **** 'em!"..Al Lewis (Grandpa Munster)

Steveo wrote:
(I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:
"**** the FCC! **** 'em!"..Al Lewis (Grandpa Munster)

F the CC. ($1 to Steve Earle)

and 25 cents to you in the Girard Petro toilet stall.

From: (Mr=A0Germanium)
WOW !!!!
A Freeband REPEATER : )
Now this looks like a great DX catch for SWL and Ham alike!
Does it operate 24/7 ?
-
(shrug) I don't know..but it's working now.

On Wed, 01 Jun 2005 18:50:16 -0400, I AmnotGeorgeBush wrote:

This repeater appears to be among the new "roving" repeaters
the clubs are moving from place to place in order to avoid detection.

It's really funny that you had to mention that fact since I've seen post
after post here on the group where it's claimed the "FCC doesn't care".
Well if that was really true I would say there wouldn't be a need for the
above so the logical conclusion would be the FCC does in fact "care" and
the operators of that 11m repeater seems to know something you don't
about their enforcement actions. Otherwise just setup it up and forget it
right?

Regards,

Leland C. Scott
KC8LDO

OK but what is the input freq?


"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 01 Jun 2005 18:50:16 -0400, I AmnotGeorgeBush wrote:

This repeater appears to be among the new "roving" repeaters
the clubs are moving from place to place in order to avoid detection.

It's really funny that you had to mention that fact since I've seen post
after post here on the group where it's claimed the "FCC doesn't care".
Well if that was really true I would say there wouldn't be a need for the
above so the logical conclusion would be the FCC does in fact "care" and
the operators of that 11m repeater seems to know something you don't
about their enforcement actions. Otherwise just setup it up and forget it
right?

Regards,

Leland C. Scott
KC8LDO

On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 23:17:46 -0500, Crapper wrote:

OK but what is the input freq?

Yeah, like I'm going to tell you.

Regards,

Leland C. Scott
KC8LDO

keyclowns can now make liasons for male to male playtime by artificial
double hop...sounds perfect for twitlips and mopathetic!

So what good is a repeater if nobody can use it, talk to yourself dumn ass.
Screw you F*CK you also you selfesh SOB. You must be a Ham, or Queer, and
you dont act like a Ham.


"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 23:17:46 -0500, Crapper wrote:

OK but what is the input freq?

Yeah, like I'm going to tell you.

Regards,

Leland C. Scott
KC8LDO

A little testy are we? That's good.

--
Leland C. Scott
KC8LDO

Linux - The alternative OS to Micro$oft Windows

"Crapper" wrote in message
...
So what good is a repeater if nobody can use it, talk to yourself dumn
ass.
Screw you F*CK you also you selfesh SOB. You must be a Ham, or Queer, and
you dont act like a Ham.


"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 23:17:46 -0500, Crapper wrote:

OK but what is the input freq?

Yeah, like I'm going to tell you.

Regards,

Leland C. Scott
KC8LDO