Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Guy" wrote in message news:F64re.15840$mC.13248@okepread07... Landshark wrote: "Guy" wrote in message news:TKMqe.15606$mC.3822@okepread07... wrote: Why should people who *want* to use it have to test for it? Why not? If you want to drive, you have to take a test, if you want to get into college you have to take a test, so what's wrong with if you are going to use code only about taking a test? Landshark I don't understand the logic in what you're saying. Are there other tests that we should introduce into society? Should we implement taking a test before you are deemed qualified to open a credit card account? Should we implement taking a test before you are deemed qualified to take the mail out of your mailbox and bring it into your house for further sorting, opening, and reading? Should we implement taking a test before you are deemed qualified to operate a gas pump to fill your car with gasoline? Should we implement taking a test before you are deemed qualified to reproduce? Ok, I'm stating some crazy things here to try to make a point... A little, but a couple might have possibilities ![]() How about just leaving some space in the ham bands for CW? If it gets used, fine, keep it. If CW dies out (and it will eventually--us old timers who got their ham ticket the hard way will eventually RIP) then reallocate it for other modes. Good, no problem there either. By the way, I don't remember having to take a test to get into college. I have a BS in Computer Science and a Masters in Computer Information Systems. As long as I paid my bill, they allowed me to go to class. Maybe not a community or Some state college's, but most want some sort of aptitude test to make sure you are not wasting the teachers & university's time. And the reason for the test to drive a car is to show something in the way of being able to drive a car and not kill someone else while doing it. I can understand the reason for the test to drive a car. I can explain valid reasons for some of my crazy examples above also. So why test for CW? It's not like anyone who attempts to operate CW without knowing all the letters at an arbitrary speed will endanger anyone or themselves while doing it. If you can read 20 to 30 WPM, would you want to here somebody pounding out only 5 WPM? Otherwise would you want to see the bands allocated to certain speeds? Point being, it would be called a qualifying test, to make sure you are able to operate in the mode you test for. Why have a test to operate any mode in any ham band these days? Most modes you are correct, but CW is almost an art, as such is dieing out. Guy Landshark -- Some of them are living an illusion Bounded by the darkness of their minds, In their eyes it's nation against nation, With racial pride, sad hearts they hide, Thinking only of themselves, They shun the light, They think they're right Living in the empty shells. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Geller Media | Broadcasting | |||
FA: Electra 1960 metal transceiver / walkie talkie | CB | |||
FA: Electra 1960 metal transceiver / walkie talkie | Swap | |||
FA: Vintage 1960 all-metal Electra walkie talkie - works | CB | |||
FA: Vintage 1960 all-metal Electra walkie talkie - works | Swap |