Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 23:36:26 GMT, james wrote
in : On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 14:24:44 -0700, Frank Gilliland wrote: And #4 is exactly why #1 is incorrect: the 'characteristic' impedance of a coax is constant, but it's 'input' impedance varies according to load mismatch at the other end. If it wasn't for this fact, a tuner at the radio end would be useless. But the point here is that if the SWR meter is left floating with the coax shield (both of which should be RF grounded) then the measurement can be darn near anything. ***** What I will agree with is that the impedance seen at the input to the coax is a reflection of the load impeadance as transformed, altered if some don't like the word transformed, by the length of the coax. I have no problem with that. Still this impedance is highly dependant on the load and its reflection coefficient. That's basically what Lance said, just in different words. So what's the problem? ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |