Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "JArthur" wrote in message oups.com... If a longer antenna is better then why do they sometimes have to be cut shorter when tuning? Actually, as long as you have an antenna tuner, the antenna need not be resonant. Years ago, the military used rhombic antennas for point to point HF long haul communications. The monsters on Guam were 600 feet on a leg (they were in a diamond shape) and 200 feet in the air. They were used on a large range of frequencies (one fixed size antenna) and simply had the reactance tuned out to present a good load for the transmitter. These things had gains that would put most Yagis to shame. That said, most of us use tuned antennas and then feed the things with 50 ohm coax and we don't need antenna tuners. 1.5 to 1 or below is excellent. 2 to 1 is about the highest you want to see without adjusting the antenna to bring it closer to resonance (if, indeed, that is the problem - a vertical over salt water will show around 36 ohms impedance when it is exactly resonant, rather than the nominal 50 ohms). Surrounding metal, imperfect grounds, and other problems can cause the antenna impedance to be above/below 50 ohms and exhibit some SWR. As long as your 1.5 or below, you're fine! 73 from Rochester, NY Jim |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Question about Sirius Satellite Radio Antenna | Broadcasting | |||
LongWire Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Shortwave |