On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 14:42:55 -0400, "Anonymous CBer"
wrote:

+The F.C.C. Does Not Exist!
*******

Actually the FCC does exist. Their biggest problem is that they get
the scraps from the Federal Budget. Your gripe is with the wrong
governmental body. Try complaining to the House and Senate
Telecommunicatons committes. They are ones that oversee the FCC and
are influencial in forming their budget allocations.

Many within the FCC would love to have another ten to twenty million
dollars annualy for enforcement. But right now most of the US taxpayer
money is going to build bombs, bullets and Hummers. Oh and I did
forget the payola of government contracts for the rebuilding of Iraq.
Then again we need to stop blowing the place up before we rebuild it.

james

james wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 14:42:55 -0400, "Anonymous CBer"
wrote:

+The F.C.C. Does Not Exist!
*******

Actually the FCC does exist. Their biggest problem is that they get

well you are both right sorta

the FCC doesn't exist, in pratical term for the reason you mention

It has a few other problems like trying regulate the laws of physics

puting a service like CB intended for local use on HF was plain stupid

hell i have accidently "worked" skip with a stand am cb and a mag mount
POS anteena last sunpsot cycle thought I was talking around Springfield
IL, till the landmarks did not match, the othe rguys was Springfeild MO

It is hard to take a group seriously that with a screw upof regas like
that

the scraps from the Federal Budget. Your gripe is with the wrong
governmental body. Try complaining to the House and Senate
Telecommunicatons committes. They are ones that oversee the FCC and
are influencial in forming their budget allocations.

Many within the FCC would love to have another ten to twenty million
dollars annualy for enforcement. But right now most of the US taxpayer
money is going to build bombs, bullets and Hummers. Oh and I did
forget the payola of government contracts for the rebuilding of Iraq.
Then again we need to stop blowing the place up before we rebuild it.

james

On 20 Jul 2005 09:54:41 -0700, "an_old_friend"
wrote:

+ Actually the FCC does exist. Their biggest problem is that they get
+
+well you are both right sorta
+
+the FCC doesn't exist, in pratical term for the reason you mention
+
+It has a few other problems like trying regulate the laws of physics
+
+puting a service like CB intended for local use on HF was plain stupid
+
+hell i have accidently "worked" skip with a stand am cb and a mag mount
+POS anteena last sunpsot cycle thought I was talking around Springfield
+IL, till the landmarks did not match, the othe rguys was Springfeild MO
+
+It is hard to take a group seriously that with a screw upof regas like
+that
*****

I still state the the FCC does exist.

Though I can agree with you that placing the CB service at 27 MHz for
what the service was intended, was a big mistake. The inablility to
control a band gone out of control from the early 70's has resulted in
a band that is essentially unenforced. WHat enforcement is now done is
in direct response to complaints from individuals to the FCC or to
individual's Congressman.

I have known of instances where COngressional representatives have sat
on the House Telecommunications commitee and have received complaints
from voters about interference from CB operators. The problems were
corrected. Also the FCC did shut down four operators in the West Palm
beach area about 10 yrs ago and they were never heard on the air
again. Seems that they lived in the flight path to Palm Beach
International Airport approach. Harmmonics from their station
operation were interfering with radio communications between planes
and tower. The FAA and the FCC did not take kindly to that.

Yes in rare incidents the FCC will enforce the regualtions. In most
part they are so understaffed that enforcement for all the frequencies
that they are required to is just not possible. I guess in a weird
way, you could say the FCC does not exist.

james

"an_old_friend" wrote:
james wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 14:42:55 -0400, "Anonymous CBer"
wrote:

+The F.C.C. Does Not Exist!
*******

Actually the FCC does exist. Their biggest problem is that they get

well you are both right sorta

the FCC doesn't exist, in pratical term for the reason you mention

It has a few other problems like trying regulate the laws of physics

puting a service like CB intended for local use on HF was plain stupid

What's 'plain stupid' is you craving a mans dick up your ass, ****stick.

hth

Steveo wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote:
james wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 14:42:55 -0400, "Anonymous CBer"
wrote:

+The F.C.C. Does Not Exist!
*******

Actually the FCC does exist. Their biggest problem is that they get

well you are both right sorta

the FCC doesn't exist, in pratical term for the reason you mention

It has a few other problems like trying regulate the laws of physics

puting a service like CB intended for local use on HF was plain stupid

What's 'plain stupid' is you craving a mans dick up your ass, ****stick.

plain stupid is making the above stement and pretending it has any
place in civilized society

hth

"an_old_friend" wrote:
Steveo wrote:
What's 'plain stupid' is you craving a mans dick up your ass,
****stick.

plain stupid is making the above stement and pretending it has any
place in civilized society

hth

Don't ask, don't tell. Especially on usenet, fudgepacker.

--
http://NewsReader.Com/

Steveo wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote:
Steveo wrote:
What's 'plain stupid' is you craving a mans dick up your ass,
****stick.

plain stupid is making the above stement and pretending it has any
place in civilized society

hth

Don't ask, don't tell. Especially on usenet, fudgepacker.

then go derect your attack K4YZ who inisted on saeching out and making
an issue of my sexuality


--
http://NewsReader.Com/

"an_old_friend" wrote:
Steveo wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote:
Steveo wrote:
What's 'plain stupid' is you craving a mans dick up your ass,
****stick.

plain stupid is making the above stement and pretending it has any
place in civilized society

hth

Don't ask, don't tell. Especially on usenet, fudgepacker.

then go derect your attack K4YZ who inisted on saeching out and making
an issue of my sexuality

I'd tell you to go suck a dick but you enjoy that too much, fruitcake.

--
http://NewsReader.Com/

From: (james)
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 14:42:55 -0400, "Anonymous CBer"
wrote:
+The F.C.C. Does Not Exist!
*******
Actually the FCC does exist. Their biggest problem is that they get the
scraps from the Federal Budget. Your gripe is with the wrong
governmental body. Try complaining to the House and Senate
Telecommunicatons committes. They are ones that oversee the FCC and are
influencial in forming their budget allocations.
Many within the FCC would love to have another ten to twenty million
dollars annualy for enforcement. But right now most of the US taxpayer
money is going to build bombs, bullets and Hummers. Oh and I did forget
the payola of government contracts for the rebuilding of Iraq. Then
again we need to stop blowing the place up before we rebuild it.
james
_
What enforcement allocation the FCC does get, is directed toward
protecting you and I from incredibly dangerous and overt sexual
connotations and profanity. All the enightened (and some not so
enlightened) countries in the world broadcast much more exposure than
the fleeting site of a woman's single breast, but not in this country.
The FCC must protect us from Janet Jackson's tit and the word "****".
I'm telling you, the only thing that makes sense is the current
administration is rampant with blatant homosexuals who actually find a
woman's breast offensive. Add Jeff Gannon to the equation and this
admin's catering to the queers while trying to maintain they are
Christians must be addressed. Smoke and mirrors won't win Bush Iraq. In
fact, his house of cards seems to be falling more each day.