| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Too much antenna voodoo now, Jay.
Your walkin' papers are still impressive imho. Jay in the Mojave wrote: Hello Steveo: I am not real impressed with the short ground plane radials I have seen advertised for the I Max 2000. I think 3 or 4 each 96 inch Francis Amazer Fiberglass Whip Antennas would be a good ground plane radial kit. Not the shorter ones I have seen advertised. Kreedenitials attached: Kreedentials:. Rock n Roll Fan Owner 1977 Ford F250 4x4 with the worlds loudest Public Address System, great for whistling at girls, or at Oldie but Goodie night at the drive in, or inconsiderate driver on their cell fones. Member Mojave Desert Radio Association, cost 9 bucks, but I didn't get change from a 10 spot?!?!? Would roll up drivers window on truck, if only I had one.... Kollage Credits, 5 ea 3 for passing, and 2 for leavin early. Jay in the Mojave Steveo wrote: Steveo wrote: (Jaa Jaa) wrote: I have a i-max 2000,is it worth the time to put a ground plane on it? You gonna stack em? :) Apparently I'm unaware of the add-on radial kit that you are asking about. I've never owned one of those. I'd ask Jay if he thinks it helps, he's sorta our resident antenna guru in this group so far. Ask him about his credentials first tho. Too much antenna voodoo now, Jay. Your walkin' papers are still impressive tho. |
Vinnie S. wrote:
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 10:56:19 -0700, Jay in the Mojave wrote: Hello Steveo: I am not real impressed with the short ground plane radials I have seen advertised for the I Max 2000. I think 3 or 4 each 96 inch Francis Amazer Fiberglass Whip Antennas would be a good ground plane radial kit. Not the shorter ones I have seen advertised. Jay, what if the radials are coiled? At the correct length? You can't cheat a ground plane reflector with a coil, can you? |
On 10 Sep 2005 02:17:15 GMT, Steveo wrote:
Vinnie S. wrote: On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 10:56:19 -0700, Jay in the Mojave wrote: Hello Steveo: I am not real impressed with the short ground plane radials I have seen advertised for the I Max 2000. I think 3 or 4 each 96 inch Francis Amazer Fiberglass Whip Antennas would be a good ground plane radial kit. Not the shorter ones I have seen advertised. Jay, what if the radials are coiled? At the correct length? You can't cheat a ground plane reflector with a coil, can you? I don't knwow, that is why I asked. Vinnie S. |
I just re-read that and that's not what I meant to say, sorta. By antenna
voodoo I mean advertised gain factors, which seem to get more outrageous every year. Your reflector idea makes sense as long as the mast can handle the wind load, it would reflect more. I have to say your ground plane is the best I've seen. Do you still sell them? Steveo wrote: Too much antenna voodoo now, Jay. Your walkin' papers are still impressive imho. Jay in the Mojave wrote: Hello Steveo: I am not real impressed with the short ground plane radials I have seen advertised for the I Max 2000. I think 3 or 4 each 96 inch Francis Amazer Fiberglass Whip Antennas would be a good ground plane radial kit. Not the shorter ones I have seen advertised. Kreedenitials attached: Kreedentials:. Rock n Roll Fan Owner 1977 Ford F250 4x4 with the worlds loudest Public Address System, great for whistling at girls, or at Oldie but Goodie night at the drive in, or inconsiderate driver on their cell fones. Member Mojave Desert Radio Association, cost 9 bucks, but I didn't get change from a 10 spot?!?!? Would roll up drivers window on truck, if only I had one.... Kollage Credits, 5 ea 3 for passing, and 2 for leavin early. Jay in the Mojave Steveo wrote: Steveo wrote: (Jaa Jaa) wrote: I have a i-max 2000,is it worth the time to put a ground plane on it? You gonna stack em? :) Apparently I'm unaware of the add-on radial kit that you are asking about. I've never owned one of those. I'd ask Jay if he thinks it helps, he's sorta our resident antenna guru in this group so far. Ask him about his credentials first tho. Too much antenna voodoo now, Jay. Your walkin' papers are still impressive tho. |
The addition of the ground plane kit in theory would lower the angle of
radiation by a certain percentage. This gives the impression of gain. If your in a flat open area in Kanas someplace or are a avid DX'er, this may give you a very slight boost. But if you don't fall into those 2 areas mentioned above, save the cash. |
On 12 Sep 2005 11:59:08 -0700, "Dungeon Master"
wrote: +The addition of the ground plane kit in theory would lower the angle of +radiation by a certain percentage. This gives the impression of gain. +If your in a flat open area in Kanas someplace or are a avid DX'er, +this may give you a very slight boost. But if you don't fall into those +2 areas mentioned above, save the cash. ****** More important on a verticle antenna is that the ground plane helps to isolate the feedline from the antenna. Then the feedline is no longer part of the antenna system and does not alter antenna tuning. james |
I-max 2000 ground plane
|
I-max 2000 ground plane
Justín Käse wrote:
In posted on Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:37:15 GMT, Wysteria wrote: On Wed, 7 Sep 2005 11:10:18 -0700, (Jaa Jaa) wrote: I have a i-max 2000,is it worth the time to put a ground plane on it? Forget about the ground plane kit, and put that antenna as high as you can get it. Antenna height trumps all. That's right! Any bulky decoupling radials on that antenna are just a waste of effort due to its basic flatter radiation pattern. Give the coax drop a couple wraps around the mast on the way down to act as a slight choke for decoupling purposes. No one has mentioned the extra wind load that add on radial kit carries. Don't waste your money on it op. Spend it on grounding instead. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:36 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com