Interesting point. In regards to Katrina, only 1/3 of the people that
were affected by the storm, had flood insurance. 1/3 seems like an
interesting figure as well. Do you think that 1/3 is high, low, or
right on? I am wondering if the 1/3 of individuals/families that had
flood insurance are even going to get paid by the insurance companies;
and with that, just who will be eligible for rebuilding money from the
govt.?

Just some thoughts I've had lately.

Buther Boy


On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 14:10:53 -0400, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:

From: (Landshark)
Another hurricane heading your way.

Batten down the hatches....................

****************Landshark


I'm good to go! We can weather storms a bit better than our sister
states along our Gulf..maybe that's because of the building codes here
or maybe that's because Floridians have been dealing with hurricanes
ever since they used to lash themselves and family members to palm trees
so they wouldn't blow away. It always seems to be the yankees on the
televison crying about how they lost their overpriced mansion on the
water. Mother nature has a funny weeding process concerning the
cleansing of her shores. As long as people continue to build on wetlands
and destroy the natural barrier islands and sawgrasses, they deserve
what mother nature tosses their way. If they have the money to continue
rebuilding, fine, but I don't believe these folks should qualify for a
single penny in aid.

--
Remove the word Spam from my e-mail to contact me...
http://www.PrivacySig.com/SIGbutherb...mail-black.png
~