Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 21st 05, 08:51 PM
Polymath
 
Posts: n/a
Default FAQ

Unbeknown to me, this thread had already been cross-posted to
the CB groups, and I would have removed that cross-posting
had I been aware of it.

In respect of that, I apologise if my remarks have caused
any offence to the CB community. However, I do not
withdraw my remarks - they are my opinion as to the
relative standing of Radio Hams and of CB Radio
enthusiasts where the playing-field is that of Radio
Hams.

However, having said that, the material quoted below
serves, I think, to illustrate quite well the
intellectual standing of CB Radio enthusiasts
upon which I have commented.....

wrote:
you are one of the worst.....idiots.....
little motherf*cker.....complete idiots like
you.....F*cking idiot moron.


  #2   Report Post  
Old October 21st 05, 11:39 PM
I AmnotGeorgeBush
 
Posts: n/a
Default FAQ

From: (Polymath)
Unbeknown to me, this thread had already


been cross-posted to the CB groups,



By a Radio Ham.

and I would have removed that cross-posting


had I been aware of it.



And how would you have done that?

In respect of that, I apologise if my remarks


have caused any offence to the CB


community.



Your remarks couldn't cause offense to anyone among these pages.

However, I do not withdraw my remarks - they


are my opinion as to the relative standing of


Radio Hams and of CB Radio enthusiasts




And that is what is gret about usenet. One can express their opinion
openly.

where the playing-field is that of Radio Hams.


However, having said that, the material quoted
below serves, I think, to illustrate quite well the
intellectual standing of CB Radio enthusiasts


upon which I have commented.....



You were doing so well by admitting it was but your opinion you were
expressing. Now that you have managed to paint all those who use a cb
with a single wide brush, you need adhere your own rule. Google "N8WWM".
Read. Enjoy. Is it now safe to say his posts serve as the intellectual
standing of Radio Hams? Of course not. It merely illustrates your
incompetence regarding communications with your fellow man. Thank you
for illustrating what has become one of the most extreme examples of
irony amongst our radio hobby.....some of those licensed for radio
communications know the least of it. You sir, epitomize the example.


  #3   Report Post  
Old October 22nd 05, 07:37 AM
Keyclowns are limpwristed
 
Posts: n/a
Default FAQ

No, twitlips...you are a just a queenboy who can't do anything but
copy/paste. The only original thing you do is with a new truck driver
every night.

  #4   Report Post  
Old October 22nd 05, 11:06 AM
The Magnum
 
Posts: n/a
Default FAQ


"Polymath" wrote in message
ups.com...
Unbeknown to me, this thread had already been cross-posted to
the CB groups, and I would have removed that cross-posting
had I been aware of it.

In respect of that, I apologise if my remarks have caused
any offence to the CB community. However, I do not
withdraw my remarks - they are my opinion as to the
relative standing of Radio Hams and of CB Radio
enthusiasts where the playing-field is that of Radio
Hams.

However, having said that, the material quoted below
serves, I think, to illustrate quite well the
intellectual standing of CB Radio enthusiasts
upon which I have commented.....

wrote:
you are one of the worst.....idiots.....
little motherf*cker.....complete idiots like
you.....F*cking idiot moron.


In the realms of talking specifically about radio apology accepted but
everyone swears at some time. Amateurs included. While i dont condone it i
can understand it. If you upset someone enough you "will" get this sort of
response. Im a CB'er by the way.
Regards,
Graham


  #5   Report Post  
Old October 29th 05, 07:25 AM
Peter
 
Posts: n/a
Default FAQ

"Polymath" wrote...
Unbeknown to me, this thread had already been cross-posted to
the CB groups, and I would have removed that cross-posting
had I been aware of it.


Why, so that you can abuse people behind their back? What would be the point
of replying to someone, but cutting out the group that the OP uses?

In respect of that, I apologise if my remarks have caused
any offence to the CB community.


I would bet that, if this was cross-posted to *real" tech groups, many qualified
engineers would also be offended by your suggestion that you are a "higher"
level of person.

However, I do not withdraw my
remarks - they are my opinion as to the relative
standing of Radio Hams and of CB Radio
enthusiasts where the playing-field is that of Radio
Hams.


Playing field? So this is nothing more than a game to you, see who can cause the
most offence.

Your problem is that you are blaming the wrong people.
Maybe this is all just an excuse, a cover for your hatred of CB, nothing to do with
Amateur rules. Otherwise you would direct your comments and anger at those
making the changes.

However, having said that, the material quoted below
serves, I think, to illustrate quite well the
intellectual standing of CB Radio enthusiasts
upon which I have commented.....


You write a message which anyone of at least average intelligence will know will offend
certain groups of people, then pretend to be shocked when some respond angrily. You
may be a Ham, but that doesn't mean you can act.

Before putting the angry response down to "CB mentality", take a look through the Google
archives at all the serious abuse sent to newsgroups by some licensed Amateurs.
Six of one, half a dozen of the other.


Regards,

Peter.




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017