Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:21:12 -0600, "DrDeath"
wrote: wrote in message ... + On 25 Jan 2006 04:48:05 -0800, "Professor" + wrote: + +You don't need the spring... and the 102" is unparalleled in +performance if mounted in the proper location... + + It depends on what 102" you are talking about. Not all 102" + antennas are created equal. Some 102" antennas can actually + be beat by some shorter antennas. + + Let the games begin. + +Mounted properly the 102" is king. + ***** I concur. A properly mounted 102 inch whip will and should perform better than any loaded antenna. Now I define performance as a combination of radiated power and VSWR bandwidth. VSWR bandwidth is as improtant as radiated power as it is an indicator of antenna radiation resistance and "Q" of the antenna. Both have effect on the efficiency of the antenna over the disired operating bandwidth of the antenna. james |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Impedance of pull-up whip on SW Receiver? | Shortwave | |||
Why do you use a whip antenna? | Shortwave | |||
Blast from the past...........102 SS whip | CB | |||
Effect of whip diameter on resonant frequency | Antenna | |||
Sony Portable versus Tabletops | Shortwave |