LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9   Report Post  
Old January 27th 06, 04:13 PM posted to rec.radio.cb
james
 
Posts: n/a
Default 102" whip

On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:21:12 -0600, "DrDeath"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
+ On 25 Jan 2006 04:48:05 -0800, "Professor"
+ wrote:
+
+You don't need the spring... and the 102" is unparalleled in
+performance if mounted in the proper location...
+
+ It depends on what 102" you are talking about. Not all 102"
+ antennas are created equal. Some 102" antennas can actually
+ be beat by some shorter antennas.
+
+ Let the games begin.
+
+Mounted properly the 102" is king.
+

*****

I concur. A properly mounted 102 inch whip will and should perform
better than any loaded antenna.

Now I define performance as a combination of radiated power and VSWR
bandwidth. VSWR bandwidth is as improtant as radiated power as it is
an indicator of antenna radiation resistance and "Q" of the antenna.
Both have effect on the efficiency of the antenna over the disired
operating bandwidth of the antenna.

james
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Impedance of pull-up whip on SW Receiver? John Smith Shortwave 42 June 6th 05 05:08 AM
Why do you use a whip antenna? Dale Shortwave 11 October 5th 04 08:25 AM
Blast from the past...........102 SS whip [email protected] CB 83 November 1st 03 02:31 AM
Effect of whip diameter on resonant frequency Ron Antenna 0 September 12th 03 01:21 AM
Sony Portable versus Tabletops mike Shortwave 10 August 30th 03 11:46 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017