Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
102" whip
I have always been up front and consistent with the specifics of this discussion. If you think I'm back pedaling it is most likely caused by your less than stellar reading comprehension. Once again, you said "we should never trust the claim of others". But after that backfired in your face you qualified it with, "but it is easier to believe....." Correct me if I'm wrong here, but "never" doesn't include "easier", does it? Again your reading comprehension is flawed. The other poster said never. I said "you don't have to believe me" What you really should do is make the comparison yourself. We would never believe you, but at least you'd know the truth. That would be the ideal scenario. However, it requires that I purchase one of these antennas that you are selling, and I don't care to risk my money on an antenna that purportedly defies the laws of physics with only marginal benefits, especially when my 102" whip does the job quite nicely and for a fraction of the cost. But you go right ahead and preach your version of "the truth" and I'll keep preaching common sense, ok? Well, I once believed just as you do until I did take the time and spent the money to check things out myself. Tell me, who went farther to seek the truth? Yet you can't account for the results. Looks like you didn't go far enough. I've suggested reasons for the results, but admitted that I don't have a definitive conclusion as to WHY the results were as is,nor do I have to in order to post the results. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Impedance of pull-up whip on SW Receiver? | Shortwave | |||
Why do you use a whip antenna? | Shortwave | |||
Blast from the past...........102 SS whip | CB | |||
Effect of whip diameter on resonant frequency | Antenna | |||
Sony Portable versus Tabletops | Shortwave |