Cobra 25LTD Classic tune up
 

On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:33:32 GMT, Lancer wrote:

+If you think my reply was an attack...LOL!!
*****

Well you did attack in a sense, you felt my comments were in some way
not warranted.

Then like I stated before, my intent was not to attack but to
instruct. Even with your comments.

Personally I think that this is just spiralling into a potential flame
war, and I don't really care to go there. I have apologized if my
comments were taken to be unwarranted. That should be sufficient to
put this part of the thread to completion.

james

Cobra 25LTD Classic tune up
 

On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 19:53:40 GMT, james wrote
in :

On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 19:49:53 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

+
+Sifting back through the thread it appears that you began this
+disagreement with an obtuse remark. To wit:
****

In my opinion I do not feel that any of my remarks were out of line or
harsh. Like I said, if they did seem that way they were not intended
to be so.

james


I believe 'obtuse' was the wrong word...... it should have been
'disjuctive'.








----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Cobra 25LTD Classic tune up
 

On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:45:27 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

+On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 19:53:40 GMT, james wrote
+in :
+
+On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 19:49:53 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:
+
++
++Sifting back through the thread it appears that you began this
++disagreement with an obtuse remark. To wit:
+****
+
+In my opinion I do not feel that any of my remarks were out of line or
+harsh. Like I said, if they did seem that way they were not intended
+to be so.
+
+james
+
+
+I believe 'obtuse' was the wrong word...... it should have been
+'disjuctive'.
+
+
*****

Did you mean disjunctive?

james

Cobra 25LTD Classic tune up
 

On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 20:38:52 GMT, james wrote
in :

On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:45:27 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

+On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 19:53:40 GMT, james wrote
+in :
+
+On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 19:49:53 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:
+
++
++Sifting back through the thread it appears that you began this
++disagreement with an obtuse remark. To wit:
+****
+
+In my opinion I do not feel that any of my remarks were out of line or
+harsh. Like I said, if they did seem that way they were not intended
+to be so.
+
+james
+
+
+I believe 'obtuse' was the wrong word...... it should have been
+'disjuctive'.
+
+
*****

Did you mean disjunctive?

james


No, I meant 'disjuctive': a barely relevant act, response, opinion,
etc, made in a vain attempt to demonstrate superior intellect. A good
example would be when someone plays spelling cop instead of addressing
the topic of the discussion.

Did I make myself clear? Or is there something -else- you don't
undrstand?







----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Cobra 25LTD Classic tune up
 

On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 15:43:38 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

+On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 20:38:52 GMT, james wrote
+in :
+
+On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:45:27 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:
+
++On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 19:53:40 GMT, james wrote
++in :
++
++On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 19:49:53 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:
++
+++
+++Sifting back through the thread it appears that you began this
+++disagreement with an obtuse remark. To wit:
++****
++
++In my opinion I do not feel that any of my remarks were out of line or
++harsh. Like I said, if they did seem that way they were not intended
++to be so.
++
++james
++
++
++I believe 'obtuse' was the wrong word...... it should have been
++'disjuctive'.
++
++
+*****
+
+Did you mean disjunctive?
+
+james
+
+
+No, I meant 'disjuctive': a barely relevant act, response, opinion,
+etc, made in a vain attempt to demonstrate superior intellect. A good
+example would be when someone plays spelling cop instead of addressing
+the topic of the discussion.
+
+Did I make myself clear? Or is there something -else- you don't
+undrstand?
+
*****

No, just at first look I did not see the word "disjuctive" in a
dictinary.

Sorry for any inconvience.

james