Frank Gilliland wrote:
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:59:57 -0600, "Dr.Death"
wrote in
:

snip


It is remotely
possible that an undercover sold me an amp, but why go to all that trouble
and not bust me?


The NSA is concerned with national security. I suppose they could lean
on the FCC and force them to enforce their regs regarding amps. But
that would cost huge amounts of money, flood the DOJ with enforcement
petitions, and very possibily **** off enough people to get the law
overturned (in court or otherwise). It's much more practical to simply
keep track of the amps and their owners, just like the BATF (and
probably the NSA) does with firearms. After all, that's what the NSA
does best -- gathering and compiling information.
indeed why should the NSA or FCC realy want to bust people if they
caand evlope the data right they come knock ona door and say I know
(froma record of sometype) you know about so and so you must now help
us stop them or we will send you to jail for (the next 9/11)

amp data is a good bargaiing chip since they are ilegal to use when
THEY need it

the FCC hardly cares what cbers do or even Hams by and large