Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old April 12th 06, 08:20 AM posted to rec.radio.cb
Jzhao
 
Posts: n/a
Default electrical length of coaxial adaptor

Hi,

Anybody know about the electrical length of the coaxial adaptors, for
example the N adaptor (m/m, m/f, f/f).
what is the formula? how to calculated?

  #2   Report Post  
Old April 12th 06, 05:43 PM posted to rec.radio.cb
Slow Code
 
Posts: n/a
Default electrical length of coaxial adaptor

"Jzhao" wrote in
oups.com:

Hi,

Anybody know about the electrical length of the coaxial adaptors, for
example the N adaptor (m/m, m/f, f/f).
what is the formula? how to calculated?



Ask this question in: rec.radio.amateur.antenna

N connectors maintain impedance, So maybe its just the physical length of
the adaptor. I'm not sure how it might effect the velocity factor.

SC
  #3   Report Post  
Old April 14th 06, 01:12 PM posted to rec.radio.cb
Jay in the Mojave
 
Posts: n/a
Default electrical length of coaxial adaptor

Hello Jzhao:

A lot of guys want to use the N type connector believing they have lower
loss. Probably not a hole lot of difference in the loss between a N type
and a PL-259 connector. The PL-259 connector will take way more power
than the N type connector, experience has shown us that.

I would think the length of the connector and a ball park VF of 80
percent would get you real close.

What ya need that info for?

Jay in the Mojave

Jzhao wrote:
Hi,

Anybody know about the electrical length of the coaxial adaptors, for
example the N adaptor (m/m, m/f, f/f).
what is the formula? how to calculated?


  #4   Report Post  
Old April 14th 06, 10:31 PM posted to rec.radio.cb
james
 
Posts: n/a
Default electrical length of coaxial adaptor

On Fri, 14 Apr 2006 05:12:43 -0700, Jay in the Mojave
wrote:

+Hello Jzhao:
+
+A lot of guys want to use the N type connector believing they have lower
+loss. Probably not a hole lot of difference in the loss between a N type
+and a PL-259 connector. The PL-259 connector will take way more power
+than the N type connector, experience has shown us that.
+

*****

The gain in slightly lower loss for N connectors is due to the
constant impedance the connector provides. PL-259 are not guaranteed
constant 50 Ohm impedance.

Still one is argueing over about 0.25 dB. At CB and most Ham
frequencies below VHF, this loss is really minimal. As for power
handling the N connector install properly and kept clean internally
should have power handling capabilities to 1 KW.

james

+I would think the length of the connector and a ball park VF of 80
+percent would get you real close.
+


The length of the connector is so little a wavelength at CB
frequencies that it is really not worth worrying about.

james
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Electrical length redhat Antenna 19 July 7th 05 11:37 AM
SWR - wtf? john d CB 136 July 2nd 05 08:31 PM
How to measure soil constants at HF Reg Edwards Antenna 104 June 25th 05 10:46 PM
FYI: NOAA Lightning Safety Awareness Week K4YZ Policy 0 June 8th 05 02:25 AM
Question on antenna symantics Jimmy Antenna 28 January 27th 04 01:10 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017