Don't try to be smug, Bob. It doesn't work. The bottom line is that, over
the years, you have angered many Hams with your incessant and inane
yammering. Don't believe me? Unkey your mic once in a while and listen to
the catcalls. Those aren't cheers, Bob, they are jeers.
Insofar as your troubles with the Florida BAR go, I could not care less. I
am sure that whatever the problems are between you and them, that you
brought them upon yourself through some lapse of common sense and intellect.
Knowing you as little as I do, Bob, I tend to suspect that, once again, your
melodious mouth overloaded your numb posterior and you found yourself in an
uncomfortable predicament of your own making.
And because I choose to disagree with you, I am "disturbed"? Because I let
you know my feelings, I am "flaming"?
You might try looking in a mirror, Bob. That is, if you still own one after
the Florida BAR finishes with you.




"Bob Sherin, W4ASX" wrote in message
oups.com...
Sorry my friend, too busy to read all the nonsense but I noticed my
book "Guardians at the Gate, Sex in the Courthouse" was not listed in
my post. It is at http://TheFloridaBar.us "Not Sponsored by The
Florida Bar."

In a glance, I noted your commentary about popularity. None of us can
know how popular we are. No doubt, as with everyone else, the panarama
of human relations is present. No doubt, my conduct has not always been
stellar, but who can claim the contrary? No doubt, throughout life all
of us are in a growth pattern. I can say this for su My qrz count
is 7,807 viewers, and the hams I elmered, one 50 years ago, are still
close friends. As well, I have dozens of open invitations to stay over
at ham's qth's around the world.

Sorry that I'm too busy to follow this thread further. From your
flaming, not your God given right to opine, I honestly believe yours is
a disturbed mind. Best wishes.

73, Bob Sherin, W4ASX

This response if for Pico, as I'm finished working for today and can do
some surfing.

Before you visit http://TheFloridaBar.us and read at least Chapter 1 of
"Guardians at the Gate, Sex in the Courthouse," realize your ill
informed statements, in fact conjecture, is just pure wrong. The
Florida Bar closed its investigation two years ago, not furnishing to
this day problable cause or charge.

No one would deny that putting the entire story out on the Net, naming
names, calling the Florida Bar corrupt, notifying them of the URL for
the manuscript, is looking in the mirror, confronting that issue as
closely as anyone can.

It is understandable that hams would be bored with that particular
subject. After all, there are infinite interets out there, and the Bar
story to most isn't a lot of fun. To me, though, learning of the
cesspool of judicial corruption here in Florida is pure revelation.
(If you want the goods on the cesspool, read Chapter 2, all about
Republican black box voting fraud.)

I'm flattered to be the center of attention, but why not pick someone
more worthy, since so many of our fellow hams have so much more on the
ball?

Bob Sherin, W4ASX

"Morris" wrote in message
oups.com...
This response if for Pico, as I'm finished working for today and can do
some surfing.

Before you visit http://TheFloridaBar.us and read at least Chapter 1 of
"Guardians at the Gate, Sex in the Courthouse," realize your ill
informed statements, in fact conjecture, is just pure wrong. The
Florida Bar closed its investigation two years ago, not furnishing to
this day problable cause or charge.

No one would deny that putting the entire story out on the Net, naming
names, calling the Florida Bar corrupt, notifying them of the URL for
the manuscript, is looking in the mirror, confronting that issue as
closely as anyone can.

It is understandable that hams would be bored with that particular
subject. After all, there are infinite interets out there, and the Bar
story to most isn't a lot of fun. To me, though, learning of the
cesspool of judicial corruption here in Florida is pure revelation.
(If you want the goods on the cesspool, read Chapter 2, all about
Republican black box voting fraud.)

I'm flattered to be the center of attention, but why not pick someone
more worthy, since so many of our fellow hams have so much more on the
ball?

Bob Sherin, W4ASX


I read part of it. Nothing personal, but it was quite boring. But then, I'm
a realist, and I see the corruption in all walks of society.

Dr. Death,

Appreciate your readership. Naive, I expect honest courts, because
that is the bedrock of our system. Your view seems wiser.

Bob Sherin, W4ASX

Bob Sherin, W4ASX wrote:
Dr. Death,

Appreciate your readership. Naive, I expect honest courts, because
that is the bedrock of our system. Your view seems wiser.

Bob Sherin, W4ASX

I hope for honesty in the court but I do always consider what the
cuport cours eof action is likely to be (so to try and head it off) I
also look for what is the easiest thing the court can do for the saem
reason

sodomized by an old freind wrote:
Bob Sherin, W4ASX wrote:
Dr. Death,

Appreciate your readership. Naive, I expect honest courts, because
that is the bedrock of our system. Your view seems wiser.

Bob Sherin, W4ASX

I hope for honesty in the court but I do always consider what the
cuport cours eof action is likely to be (so to try and head it off) I
also look for what is the easiest thing the court can do for the saem
reason

You mean like the courts that convicteed you?

wrote:

sodomized by an old freind wrote:

Bob Sherin, W4ASX wrote:

Dr. Death,

Appreciate your readership. Naive, I expect honest courts, because
that is the bedrock of our system. Your view seems wiser.

Bob Sherin, W4ASX

I hope for honesty in the court but I do always consider what the
cuport cours eof action is likely to be (so to try and head it off) I
also look for what is the easiest thing the court can do for the saem
reason


You mean like the courts that convicteed you?


Convicteed? Mwhahahahhahahahahaha. What a dumbass!!!