RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Digital (https://www.radiobanter.com/digital/)
-   -   QST review of up-to-date amateur equip ... (https://www.radiobanter.com/digital/135224-qst-review-up-date-amateur-equip.html)

John Smith July 22nd 08 07:09 AM

QST review of up-to-date amateur equip ...
 
http://www.flex-radio.com/

Just go down the page to:

FLEX-5000A July QST Product Review Now Available for Download

Regards,
JS

Brian July 22nd 08 12:01 PM

QST review of up-to-date amateur equip ...
 
On Jul 22, 2:09 am, John Smith wrote:
http://www.flex-radio.com/

Just go down the page to:

FLEX-5000A July QST Product Review Now Available for Download

Regards,
JS


Your point is ..........?

Brian w3rv

Usenet User July 22nd 08 01:56 PM

QST review of up-to-date amateur equip ...
 
He really has no point. My guess he is just trying to pimp the
equipment. Probably works for Flex Radio.

Brian wrote:
On Jul 22, 2:09 am, John Smith wrote:
http://www.flex-radio.com/

Just go down the page to:

FLEX-5000A July QST Product Review Now Available for Download

Regards,
JS


Your point is ..........?

Brian w3rv

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

John Smith July 22nd 08 03:16 PM

QST review of up-to-date amateur equip ...
 
Brian wrote:
On Jul 22, 2:09 am, John Smith wrote:
http://www.flex-radio.com/

Just go down the page to:

FLEX-5000A July QST Product Review Now Available for Download

Regards,
JS


Your point is ..........?

Brian w3rv


When I go and visit others shacks, it becomes clear there is a real and
present need to provoke them too upgrade to modern equipment ...

Regards,
JS

Spamm Trappe July 22nd 08 04:12 PM

QST review of up-to-date amateur equip ...
 
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 04:01:55 -0700 (PDT), Brian wrote:
On Jul 22, 2:09 am, John Smith wrote:
http://www.............


Your point is ..........?


His point was to SPAM his URL and direct traffic to it.
Which you succeeded in assisting by *REPOSTING* the damn spam.

John Smith July 22nd 08 04:17 PM

QST review of up-to-date amateur equip ...
 
Spamm Trappe wrote:

...
His point was to SPAM his URL and direct traffic to it.
Which you succeeded in assisting by *REPOSTING* the damn spam.


LOL!

Where, exactly, would you expect posts about digital equipment--other
than a digital/equipment thread?

Maybe rec.radio.amateur.smokesignals?

Geesh, takes all types! :-(

Regards,
JS

John Smith July 22nd 08 04:31 PM

QST review of up-to-date amateur equip ...
 
John Smith wrote:
Spamm Trappe wrote:

...
His point was to SPAM his URL and direct traffic to it.
Which you succeeded in assisting by *REPOSTING* the damn spam.


LOL!

Where, exactly, would you expect posts about digital equipment--other
than a digital/equipment thread?

Maybe rec.radio.amateur.smokesignals?

Geesh, takes all types! :-(

Regards,
JS


If you failed to notice, the transceiver comes with open source
software; Meaning, you can modify the software to operate with any
digital data transfer protocol (modes, to the illiterate) which anyone
can imagine.

Regards,
JS

John Smith July 22nd 08 04:41 PM

QST review of up-to-date amateur equip ...
 
Spamm Trappe wrote:

...
His point was to SPAM his URL and direct traffic to it.
Which you succeeded in assisting by *REPOSTING* the damn spam.


Yanno, the illogic of that statement overwhelms me. It makes me wonder
where people capable/prone-to making such statements come from?

I mean that statement presupposes that an interest in state-of-the-art
equipment is some sort of illicit/insane leaning which needs to be
ignored/attacked.

What, you are still awaiting the return of the spark-gap transmitters?
This all, only, sounds to me as if you wish burden others with your
preferences/likes/interests/beliefs/etc ... What? Everyone is an
amateur politician these days?

Regards,
JS

John Ferrell July 23rd 08 01:45 PM

QST review of up-to-date amateur equip ...
 
On 22 Jul 2008 15:12:25 GMT, Spamm Trappe
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 04:01:55 -0700 (PDT), Brian wrote:
On Jul 22, 2:09 am, John Smith wrote:
http://www.............


Your point is ..........?


His point was to SPAM his URL and direct traffic to it.
Which you succeeded in assisting by *REPOSTING* the damn spam.

I usally refrain from commenting on stuff like this but I gotta ask
today:
The groups posted to are
rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.digi tal.misc

The url is pointing to a very high end transciever.

Just what is it that does not fit?
John Ferrell W8CCW


John Smith July 23rd 08 11:04 PM

QST review of up-to-date amateur equip ...
 
Usenet User wrote:
He really has no point. My guess he is just trying to pimp the
equipment. Probably works for Flex Radio.


Actually, I am a proud owner of the 5000C ... it's beautiful ...

Regards,
JS


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com