http://www.flex-radio.com/

Just go down the page to:

FLEX-5000A July QST Product Review Now Available for Download

Regards,
JS

On Jul 22, 2:09 am, John Smith wrote:
http://www.flex-radio.com/

Just go down the page to:

FLEX-5000A July QST Product Review Now Available for Download

Regards,
JS

Your point is ..........?

Brian w3rv

He really has no point. My guess he is just trying to pimp the
equipment. Probably works for Flex Radio.

Brian wrote:
On Jul 22, 2:09 am, John Smith wrote:
http://www.flex-radio.com/

Just go down the page to:

FLEX-5000A July QST Product Review Now Available for Download

Regards,
JS

Your point is ..........?

Brian w3rv
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

Brian wrote:
On Jul 22, 2:09 am, John Smith wrote:
http://www.flex-radio.com/

Just go down the page to:

FLEX-5000A July QST Product Review Now Available for Download

Regards,
JS

Your point is ..........?

Brian w3rv

When I go and visit others shacks, it becomes clear there is a real and
present need to provoke them too upgrade to modern equipment ...

Regards,
JS

On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 04:01:55 -0700 (PDT), Brian wrote:
On Jul 22, 2:09 am, John Smith wrote:
http://www.............

Your point is ..........?

His point was to SPAM his URL and direct traffic to it.
Which you succeeded in assisting by *REPOSTING* the damn spam.

Spamm Trappe wrote:

...
His point was to SPAM his URL and direct traffic to it.
Which you succeeded in assisting by *REPOSTING* the damn spam.

LOL!

Where, exactly, would you expect posts about digital equipment--other
than a digital/equipment thread?

Maybe rec.radio.amateur.smokesignals?

Geesh, takes all types! :-(

Regards,
JS

John Smith wrote:
Spamm Trappe wrote:

...
His point was to SPAM his URL and direct traffic to it.
Which you succeeded in assisting by *REPOSTING* the damn spam.

LOL!

Where, exactly, would you expect posts about digital equipment--other
than a digital/equipment thread?

Maybe rec.radio.amateur.smokesignals?

Geesh, takes all types! :-(

Regards,
JS

If you failed to notice, the transceiver comes with open source
software; Meaning, you can modify the software to operate with any
digital data transfer protocol (modes, to the illiterate) which anyone
can imagine.

Regards,
JS

Spamm Trappe wrote:

...
His point was to SPAM his URL and direct traffic to it.
Which you succeeded in assisting by *REPOSTING* the damn spam.

Yanno, the illogic of that statement overwhelms me. It makes me wonder
where people capable/prone-to making such statements come from?

I mean that statement presupposes that an interest in state-of-the-art
equipment is some sort of illicit/insane leaning which needs to be
ignored/attacked.

What, you are still awaiting the return of the spark-gap transmitters?
This all, only, sounds to me as if you wish burden others with your
preferences/likes/interests/beliefs/etc ... What? Everyone is an
amateur politician these days?

Regards,
JS

On 22 Jul 2008 15:12:25 GMT, Spamm Trappe
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 04:01:55 -0700 (PDT), Brian wrote:
On Jul 22, 2:09 am, John Smith wrote:
http://www.............

Your point is ..........?

His point was to SPAM his URL and direct traffic to it.
Which you succeeded in assisting by *REPOSTING* the damn spam.
I usally refrain from commenting on stuff like this but I gotta ask
today:
The groups posted to are
rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.digi tal.misc

The url is pointing to a very high end transciever.

Just what is it that does not fit?
John Ferrell W8CCW

Usenet User wrote:
He really has no point. My guess he is just trying to pimp the
equipment. Probably works for Flex Radio.

Actually, I am a proud owner of the 5000C ... it's beautiful ...

Regards,
JS