Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Charles Brabham" wrote in message:
APRS was developed as a packet radio "killer application" by folks associated with TAPR in the US. Hi Charles: I don't believe that is true. If you'll check early issues of Gateway (I think around 1993) you'll see APRS was initially developed to track sailboats out of the U.S. Naval academy in Annapolis, MD. So if you want to go pointing fingers, point it at the U.S. Navy. Now, if your claiming TAPR shameless tried to ride the coattails of APRS, then I will agree with you. Their only real contribution to APRS was to form the APRS working group, which they quickly cut and run from leaving a adminstrative FUBAR'ed mess behind. The idea is to kill any interest in packet by eliminating its most interesting and useful features, substituting a pointless internet-dependent activity sure to put just about anyone to sleep. Have you even run APRS? Up until about 1998 it didn't even use the internet, and the way it uses the internet is as a giant data collector. APRS is firmly in the RF domain, even if some people use it to track their homes ;-( APRS fits TAPR's ideal of a "killer application" perfectly - It kills off all interest in the hobby. TAPR bashing aside, APRS has generated quite a bit of interest in the hobby, and a strong case could be made it has prolonged interest in RF based packet radio. The more TNC's they can talk hams into tying up so they can report thier house's position on the internet, the less will be used for communicating as hams or doing anything else that may be interesting or useful. Ahh.... now that is the rub, isn't it? "anything interesting or useful" What do you suggest? The only other popular packet application on the horizon I see is WinLink. You may not like that, but those are the facts. And oh, did I mention, WinLink has a form of APRS position reporting in it as well. Charles, you interest in some of streaming protocols is well placed. This could be a killer application if further developed and refined. If your that concerned, I suggest putting efforts into that. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The exciting world of APRS | Digital | |||
The exciting world of APRS | Antenna | |||
APRS Safety Question | Digital | |||
APRS Safety Question | Digital | |||
APRS Linked Repeaters | Digital |