Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Caveat Lector" wrote in message ... According to http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...lated?lnk=rgam About only 115 DXers CL That's Google Subscribers. Not the number that Read in via ALL USENET Google Groups does not equal USENET Groups. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:47:02 GMT, "R. Scott"
wrote: "Caveat Lector" wrote in message ... According to http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...lated?lnk=rgam About only 115 DXers CL That's Google Subscribers. Not the number that Read in via ALL USENET Google Groups does not equal USENET Groups. Only 115 does not surprise me because most computer users, including DXers, are not aware of UseNet. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() About only 115 DXers I wonder how many folks are on here through various uncounted interfaces? I got a lot of direct responses recently with a thread I started, so Ithink the number is much higher. Dave WB4IUY |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FYI: Subscribers to this NG | Antenna | |||
Electromagnetic Radiation | General | |||
Electromagnetic Radiation | Policy | |||
XM use (granted, I am a very small sample) | Broadcasting | |||
QST vs CQ | Equipment |