Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry Gauthier (K8UT)" wrote in message ... Although these raw figures show growth up until 2000, they produce a false sense of a ham radio as a "healthy hobby". .... - consider the average age of licensed hams ( http://users.crosspaths.net/~wallio/LICENSE.html US figures are available for comparison... we'll have to extrapolate that other nations are experiencing a similar trend) the hobby could be seen as being terminally ill, with very little fresh blood being infused by young hams. I'm a relatively new ham (licensed in 2002), and I'm what the average ham would consider "young" at 42. I was mildly surprised when I joined the ham club where I work - MITRE, in Bedford MA. We host a Winlink node (club sign is W1ON), we host a field day every spring. All the officers of the club, except one, are younger than I am - late twenties/early thirties. And we have at least a couple of women. Granted, MITRE is a technical company (R&D for the US Govt), so we have a ready pool of technical men and women. But at least we're contrary to the stereotype. My point is - all is not lost. There is a younger generation in the wings. Instead of complaining, get out and promote amateur radio. Yeah, cell phones are cool, but they require a multi-billion dollar infrastructure to make them work. Ditto for the Internet. Show a kid how a cell-phone sized radio can talk directly to someone halfway around the world - without having a "4 bars" connection to the neighborhood cell tower, and you open up their mind just a bit more than the normal classroom fare. I wish the statistics proved otherwise, but I think your celebration of the IARU charts is a bit mis-guided. -- -larry K8UT BTW, Larry - my dad's name is Lawrence also. Nice to know there's more than one Lau(w)rence Gauthier in the world. And one that spells Gauthier correctly, too! Jon Gauthier KB1HTW |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
right on guys !
btw, many of those inactive hams are now returning to the hobby due to retirement, kids at school or more spare time and the interest is there. I'm 46, tech ten years and general by june ! 73 qro "Jon Gauthier (KB1HTW)" wrote: "Larry Gauthier (K8UT)" wrote in message ... Although these raw figures show growth up until 2000, they produce a false sense of a ham radio as a "healthy hobby". ... - consider the average age of licensed hams ( http://users.crosspaths.net/~wallio/LICENSE.html US figures are available for comparison... we'll have to extrapolate that other nations are experiencing a similar trend) the hobby could be seen as being terminally ill, with very little fresh blood being infused by young hams. I'm a relatively new ham (licensed in 2002), and I'm what the average ham would consider "young" at 42. I was mildly surprised when I joined the ham club where I work - MITRE, in Bedford MA. We host a Winlink node (club sign is W1ON), we host a field day every spring. All the officers of the club, except one, are younger than I am - late twenties/early thirties. And we have at least a couple of women. Granted, MITRE is a technical company (R&D for the US Govt), so we have a ready pool of technical men and women. But at least we're contrary to the stereotype. My point is - all is not lost. There is a younger generation in the wings. Instead of complaining, get out and promote amateur radio. Yeah, cell phones are cool, but they require a multi-billion dollar infrastructure to make them work. Ditto for the Internet. Show a kid how a cell-phone sized radio can talk directly to someone halfway around the world - without having a "4 bars" connection to the neighborhood cell tower, and you open up their mind just a bit more than the normal classroom fare. I wish the statistics proved otherwise, but I think your celebration of the IARU charts is a bit mis-guided. -- -larry K8UT BTW, Larry - my dad's name is Lawrence also. Nice to know there's more than one Lau(w)rence Gauthier in the world. And one that spells Gauthier correctly, too! Jon Gauthier KB1HTW |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.iaru.org/statsum00.html
Sez In 1960 there were 399,000 Amateur stations world wide In 2000 there were 2,789,720 Amateur stations world wide You have to be careful about these figures. For example: in the UK the RSGB is well-known for telling lies about their subscriber numbers. Ask them for detailed info on the subject and they immediately refuse, claiming "commercial confidentiality" ![]() And that's quite apart from the famous time they sent a "family membership" form to someone's dog ... .... I believe the owner actually filled it in and the mutt has been a "member" ever since ! Young Nick |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() you have a better source ?? -- Caveat Lector (Reader Beware) "Young Nick" wrote in message ... http://www.iaru.org/statsum00.html Sez In 1960 there were 399,000 Amateur stations world wide In 2000 there were 2,789,720 Amateur stations world wide You have to be careful about these figures. For example: in the UK the RSGB is well-known for telling lies about their subscriber numbers. Ask them for detailed info on the subject and they immediately refuse, claiming "commercial confidentiality" ![]() And that's quite apart from the famous time they sent a "family membership" form to someone's dog ... ... I believe the owner actually filled it in and the mutt has been a "member" ever since ! Young Nick |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not according to the IARU page at URL:
http://www.iaru.org/statsum00.html Sez In 1960 there were 399,000 Amateur stations world wide In 2000 there were 2,789,720 Amateur stations world wide I suspect the figures have increased since 2000 How many are active? 1/10 of that? Roland, NK2U |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roland Stiner" wrote in message
... Not according to the IARU page at URL: http://www.iaru.org/statsum00.html Sez In 1960 there were 399,000 Amateur stations world wide In 2000 there were 2,789,720 Amateur stations world wide I suspect the figures have increased since 2000 How many are active? 1/10 of that? I don't know -- do you ? Does anyone ? Source please for your 1/10 figure Ok have it your way -- only 1/10 are active -- multiply the above figures by 1/10. (;-) CL |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|