Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old March 26th 05, 02:52 AM
N1KI
 
Posts: n/a
Default FT5XO long?

Does FT5XO have an online log?
  #2   Report Post  
Old March 26th 05, 03:38 AM
Bob Nielsen
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 02:52:15 GMT, N1KI wrote:
Does FT5XO have an online log?


No.

--
Bob Nielsen, N7XY n7xy (at) n7xy.net
Bainbridge Island, WA http://www.n7xy.net

  #3   Report Post  
Old March 26th 05, 05:57 AM
Gery Scott
 
Posts: n/a
Default

N1KI wrote:
Does FT5XO have an online log?

No

Gerry K1NY
  #4   Report Post  
Old March 27th 05, 09:46 PM
Peter Lemken
 
Posts: n/a
Default

N1KI wrote:
Does FT5XO have an online log?


Why would you need one?

Peter Lemken
DF5JT
Berlin

--
Was schlechten Geschmack so berauschend macht, ist die aristokratische
Wonne der VerÀrgerung.

-- Charles Baudelaire
  #9   Report Post  
Old March 28th 05, 05:49 AM
Mike Luther
 
Posts: n/a
Default

There's more to why, if possible, on-line logs are a real help..

Hank Oredson wrote:

"N1KI" wrote in message
...


In article ,
wrote:


N1KI wrote:


Does FT5XO have an online log?


Why would you need one?

Peter Lemken
DF5JT
Berlin



Once I know a dxpeditioin has my call sign entered in their log correctly,
I quit calling them. That way others who still need to work them have a
better chance of doing so. It is called courtesy, something you don't see
much on on major dxpedition frequencies, so I understand why you would
ask..



You mean you can't tell if you worked them, if you work them ???
I'm soooo confused ...




The issue is that pirate operations also are out there that make
contacts using the official call. This operation was very kind not to
divulge the expected call until they went on the air. That does help
prevent the fraudlent operations using the call, to a point.


But the problem still exists, even with good DX operations, operators
and so on. In really wanted and needed operations like this one,
without an on-line log, you may get a 'perfect' copy and reply to you
from a station signing the needed call. But is it real? Thus,
especially on low band operation where path headings, opening time
windows and so on, are a lot harder to spot for many people, the only
way to really make a best effort possible to be *SURE* you got the
station .. is to make a duplicate QSO on bands really needed.
Especially low band operations.


Net effect; without on-line log confirmations, those duplicate QSO
operations really add to the noise and QRM. Often to be met by the
really good operations answer of "DUPE!" in some casesd, in others the
DX station just ignores the dupe issue. And at that point, here goes
more and more calling by really decent people, who simply are trying to
guarantee that rare moment for all we work so hard to make possible.
Both the DX operation, and even the best operators who are polite, kind
and attentive to others as to feelings - can suffer from lack of on-line
logs, if they can be enabled, for this reason.


W5WQN


--


-- Sleep well; OS2's still awake!

Mike Luther
  #10   Report Post  
Old March 28th 05, 02:08 PM
Bob Schreibmaier
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , says...



"N1KI" wrote in message
...
In article , "Hank
Oredson" wrote:
"N1KI" wrote in message
...
In article ,

wrote:
N1KI wrote:
Does FT5XO have an online log?

Why would you need one?

Peter Lemken
DF5JT
Berlin



Once I know a dxpeditioin has my call sign entered in their log
correctly,
I quit calling them. That way others who still need to work them have a
better chance of doing so. It is called courtesy, something you don't
see
much on on major dxpedition frequencies, so I understand why you would
ask..

You mean you can't tell if you worked them, if you work them ???
I'm soooo confused ...


Then I will make it simple. The key words are "log" and "entered
correctly".
Typo's and transpositions do occur. If you need more help with simple
words
and concepts, please feel free to ask. I try to exercise patience as well
as
courtesy. Unless, of course, you are wasting bandwith by trolling.



I had one entirely miss logging my contact one time. There was no confusion
as to who they were talking to but it simply didn't get logged.


This isn't really all that unusual. My first Kure
Island QSO many years ago happened exactly like
that. It was toward the end of the DXpedition.
I know he copied everything, because we had something
of an actual QSO, rather than "59 QRZ?" Yet, he
still failed to put me in the log.

I was so upset! Being young and naive, I thought
I would never work Kure again! :-)

73,
Bob

--
+----------------------------------------------+
| Bob Schreibmaier K3PH | E-mail:
|
| Kresgeville, PA 18333 |
http://www.dxis.org |
+----------------------------------------------+

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HOW LONG IS CRANUS THE ANUS GONNA HIDE? AKC SLAPS PACETRONICS HARD! CB 0 February 8th 04 10:32 PM
Any Good Or Useful For Listening Only ?: WiNRADiO WR-LWA-0130 Long Wire Antenna Adapter Robert11 Antenna 1 November 6th 03 03:47 AM
Help:Tower installation/repair Long Island Fjx1 Antenna 3 August 22nd 03 01:04 PM
Opinions please G5 against long wire against windom? Chris Bartlett Antenna 1 July 31st 03 11:15 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017