Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I also know a DXer who has a very high country count using DX Nets ONLY
Is that DXing ? Also know several DXers who do not return a QSL for any country they have confirmed - Is that DXing ? All this to stir the DX pot (NG) with some different views Whatta ya think ? -- CL -- I doubt, therefore I might be ! "Caveat Lector" wrote in message news:uAc0f.10$i%.8@fed1read07... Had one DXer exclaim -- the only difference between a DX Net and the Packet clusters is when using the clusters -- ya still have to break the pileup (;-) I know DXers that never tune, never spot, just monitor the clusters and let someone else do the hard work -- is that DXing ? Just some thoughts -- CL -- I doubt, therefore I might be ! "Charlie" wrote in message ... Before I was introduced to DX Cluster service I did the "old fashioned way" of tune..tune..listen..listen. Yes it yielded results and I snagged my share of "new ones". However once I got on DX cluster service via 2M my country count literally skyrocketed -and- I was then able to share the ones I found with other hams. I prefer the "new old fashioned way" since I can share my findings with other hams. IMHO using and contributing to the DX cluster is much more in line with "True Ham Spirit" then the old fashioned way which does not allow for sharing. -- Charlie-AD5TH (DXCC 317 and counting) www.ad5th.com "Caveat Lector" wrote in message news:gcb0f.2$i%.1@fed1read07... Then there are those that don't use the clusters at all, nor DX nets or DX lists. They do it the old fashioned way -- tune tune listen listen. Who do you think works the DX first, and maybe puts it on the clusters ? Just a few of my thoughts -- CL -- I doubt, therefore I might be ! wrote in message ups.com... Just a few of my thoughts... Nowadays more and more people use webpage based dxclusters as as source of information. Recently i have swapped logging programs and it was very hard to log myself into my usual cluster and had to use a web-based cluster, indeed i couldnt react with the dxcluster at all, just take the info spotted. I could post spots, but these went to DXsummmit which is web based. Now i am a strong believer in traditional dxclusters, the guys that get these facilities up and running and keep them ticking over sometimes deserve a medal. The cost of them maintaining packetradio access is not as great as in years gone by but the time and maintainance is still a concern. Not many people are aware of what is involved in keeping the cluster network running smoothly and preventing the abuse which can go on. Remember the websites that provide you with a webpage of dx spots and announcements are getting their information from the original dxcluster network. So i say, wherever possible, support your local dxcluster by using their facilities to the best advantage, its really all the Cluster-sysops ask! Kind regards and 73 Linda http://www.gb7mbc.net |