Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Should I run a Sky-wire loop?
Walter:
Well, it all depends... (Bet that was a whole lot of help...) Personally, nearly all of my antennas are for transmission as well as receiving, and I can tell you that what most people call a "Sky Wire Loop" has been pretty effective for me. I am located at an elevation of a whopping 180 feet above sea level, approximately 2 miles from the ocean. My location is about 119.5 degrees north latitude and 155 degrees west longitude on the Big Island of Hawaii, the southernmost island in the island chain. From here, just about everything you'd normally hear is considered DX. I've had a 600 to 700 loop up, supported by local and brittle trees (albesia) that started with an average installed height of about 30 feet, and eventually got down below 20 feet average height before it got pulled down. At the current time, I've got poles in place to install about a 1000 foot loop nearly 40 feet high, but am waiting for hurricane jimene to pass the big island before I put up the big loop. We expect the hurricane to pass us Monday morning without landfall (if all goes well), and I'll get the wire loop back up once it passes.... I got decent results with the 600+ foot loop on all bands except 160m, and it may have not been all that effective down there anyway, given my location. From here, nearly any contact (except those few within 200 miles) is DX. No short skip from here, unless it is in excess of 2300 miles.... I've been favorably impressed with the performance of the 600+ plus loop both in receive and transmit, so much so that I was willing to spend nearly $500 to put up the 1000 foot loop, not including the cost of the boom truck to raise the poles to support the new loop. If you're so lucky as to have some tall trees, so much the better, as the actual wire costs are pretty inexpensive. I use 12 gauge stranded, insulated wire and have had no problems with wire loops (in several locations) for nearly ten years using typical THHN type stranded wire. You may get away with a smaller gauge wire if you aren't using trees for supports, (but I will still be using 12 Ga. for my pole supported loop... Habits die hard sometimes in the Ham Radio world.) You could even use bare wire, but I prefer insulated wire because if I get in contact with a tree or other support, I don't have to worry much... Well, this got a bunch longer than I intended, but the bottom line is: If you are wondering about how effective a decent sized loop can be, put one up and find out. Typically, you won't be disappointed. Horizontally oriented loops don't seem to get much of the local interference like vertical whips do, and they are essentially omnidirectional, with some gain depending upon the number of wavelengths for your band of interest. There are definitely times that the loop outperforms even a decent beam, and others where the beam really shines and loop takes second place, but if you don't have a good tower with a rotatable tower for the bands you are interested in, a large, horizontal loop can't be a bad thing.... Good luck and Good Listening! Thanks --Rick AH7H Walter wrote: Should I run a Sky-wire loop? I currently have a dipole hung by two trees about 30 feet off the ground. I would replace the dipole and run the Skywire loop off the same trees, along with two more trees at the same height as the current dipole. This antenna would only be used for receiving, and never for transmitting, the same for the dipole. My question is, does anybody think it will make enough of a difference over the dipole to warrant running it? I would also like to know what your views are on "grounding" either my current dipole, or the Sky-wire. Currently, I have the coax center wire soldered onto one end of the dipole, and the braid soldered onto the other end. I was told that I should also ground the braid before it comes into the house and into the radio. I do have a ground wire attached to GND screw on the back of the radio, going outside to a piece of copper pipe pounded into the ground. Is this enough, or do I need to also ground the braid, and if so, how? Will grounding help my reception, or decrease the noise on the line? Thanks. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Walter:
Well, it all depends... (Bet that was a whole lot of help...) Personally, nearly all of my antennas are for transmission as well as receiving, and I can tell you that what most people call a "Sky Wire Loop" has been pretty effective for me. I am located at an elevation of a whopping 180 feet above sea level, approximately 2 miles from the ocean. My location is about 119.5 degrees north latitude and 155 degrees west longitude on the Big Island of Hawaii, the southernmost island in the island chain. From here, just about everything you'd normally hear is considered DX. I've had a 600 to 700 loop up, supported by local and brittle trees (albesia) that started with an average installed height of about 30 feet, and eventually got down below 20 feet average height before it got pulled down. At the current time, I've got poles in place to install about a 1000 foot loop nearly 40 feet high, but am waiting for hurricane jimene to pass the big island before I put up the big loop. We expect the hurricane to pass us Monday morning without landfall (if all goes well), and I'll get the wire loop back up once it passes.... I got decent results with the 600+ foot loop on all bands except 160m, and it may have not been all that effective down there anyway, given my location. From here, nearly any contact (except those few within 200 miles) is DX. No short skip from here, unless it is in excess of 2300 miles.... I've been favorably impressed with the performance of the 600+ plus loop both in receive and transmit, so much so that I was willing to spend nearly $500 to put up the 1000 foot loop, not including the cost of the boom truck to raise the poles to support the new loop. If you're so lucky as to have some tall trees, so much the better, as the actual wire costs are pretty inexpensive. I use 12 gauge stranded, insulated wire and have had no problems with wire loops (in several locations) for nearly ten years using typical THHN type stranded wire. You may get away with a smaller gauge wire if you aren't using trees for supports, (but I will still be using 12 Ga. for my pole supported loop... Habits die hard sometimes in the Ham Radio world.) You could even use bare wire, but I prefer insulated wire because if I get in contact with a tree or other support, I don't have to worry much... Well, this got a bunch longer than I intended, but the bottom line is: If you are wondering about how effective a decent sized loop can be, put one up and find out. Typically, you won't be disappointed. Horizontally oriented loops don't seem to get much of the local interference like vertical whips do, and they are essentially omnidirectional, with some gain depending upon the number of wavelengths for your band of interest. There are definitely times that the loop outperforms even a decent beam, and others where the beam really shines and loop takes second place, but if you don't have a good tower with a rotatable tower for the bands you are interested in, a large, horizontal loop can't be a bad thing.... Good luck and Good Listening! Thanks --Rick AH7H Walter wrote: Should I run a Sky-wire loop? I currently have a dipole hung by two trees about 30 feet off the ground. I would replace the dipole and run the Skywire loop off the same trees, along with two more trees at the same height as the current dipole. This antenna would only be used for receiving, and never for transmitting, the same for the dipole. My question is, does anybody think it will make enough of a difference over the dipole to warrant running it? I would also like to know what your views are on "grounding" either my current dipole, or the Sky-wire. Currently, I have the coax center wire soldered onto one end of the dipole, and the braid soldered onto the other end. I was told that I should also ground the braid before it comes into the house and into the radio. I do have a ground wire attached to GND screw on the back of the radio, going outside to a piece of copper pipe pounded into the ground. Is this enough, or do I need to also ground the braid, and if so, how? Will grounding help my reception, or decrease the noise on the line? Thanks. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Rick,
Thanks for the input, I have been to the big island, twice. Once in 1972, and once in 1978. I would love to go back sometime, but need to talk my wife into it. Anyway, it also sounds like you have a lot of real estate. I have a pretty big back yard. That is almost made for a sky-wire loop. Here is photo from last year, you can see that I have trees boarding it all the way around. (the house is behind me when I took the photo) The dipole is currently hooked to the tall maple in the back on the left had side of this photo, running back to the house and another maple tree of equal size in the front yard. There are large trees on the right hand side of the property just out of view of this photo in which I could run a few extra supports. http://www.altonillinois.com/newhouse/backyard6.jpg when I bought this house last year, I kind of lucked out. I got a place that is only a half a mile or so from the highest elevation in the county (keep in mind this is Illinois), and I'm only 50 feet or so below that (580 feet) I am leaning towards putting one up. It doesn't sound like it would take much more work. How is your feed line grounded? Thanks. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Rick,
Thanks for the input, I have been to the big island, twice. Once in 1972, and once in 1978. I would love to go back sometime, but need to talk my wife into it. Anyway, it also sounds like you have a lot of real estate. I have a pretty big back yard. That is almost made for a sky-wire loop. Here is photo from last year, you can see that I have trees boarding it all the way around. (the house is behind me when I took the photo) The dipole is currently hooked to the tall maple in the back on the left had side of this photo, running back to the house and another maple tree of equal size in the front yard. There are large trees on the right hand side of the property just out of view of this photo in which I could run a few extra supports. http://www.altonillinois.com/newhouse/backyard6.jpg when I bought this house last year, I kind of lucked out. I got a place that is only a half a mile or so from the highest elevation in the county (keep in mind this is Illinois), and I'm only 50 feet or so below that (580 feet) I am leaning towards putting one up. It doesn't sound like it would take much more work. How is your feed line grounded? Thanks. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Walter:
I've tried two methods of feeding the loop(s) here. At first, I just hooked a chunk (technical term for random length I had on hand) of coax to the loop, with center conductor to one side and shield to the other side of the loop. This connected to one port of an MFJ 986 Differential T tuner. The coax wasn't separately, using the ground connection through the MFJ tuner and on to station ground, which is a grid of wires buried under a 1600+ square foot concrete slab that is the floor of my Workshop/studio/ham shack. .A second method I used was connecting 600 ohm ladder line to the loop and bringing it down to an old Johnson Matchbox tuner. The tuner case is connected to station ground, but neither leg of the ladder line is. Both methods got out, and I did pretty well with the coax approach, but I prefer the Johnson Matchbox because I feel it is "cleaner" (another technical term, meaning I just feel better about the balanced tuner than a coax tuner) than the coax type of connection. Propagation has been enough different between the times that I had the coax up and when I put up the ladder line that I can't do a direct A-B comparison, but I think it may have been a little better with the balanced ladder line feeder.... Now that hurricane jimena has passed us by, I'll get moving in getting the big loop up, but now my wife wants me to put a flag/windsock on each of two of the supports, so that may delay me another week or two.... however, when I do put it up, it will go up with 600 ohm ladder line feeding one of my Matchboxes. Putting up a horizontal loop takes a bit of doing if you want it to stay up. For the first few I've done, I've just got out the old slingshot and lobbed a fishing weight over a series of trees, pulling a nylon line behind, which was connected to a 12 gauge wire that would become the actual antenna. Fairly quick and it works well as a semi-permanent antenna as well as a field day "quickie". However, eventually, it will drift downward and get close enough to the ground you may want to re-string the wire. Not a big deal, especially from the looks of the kinds of trees you have. Here, the only trees I have are just too brittle to keep a wire in them for long. They shed limbs on their own at the slightest excuse. For a more permanent installation, I've purchased threaded thickwall (galvanized) electrical conduit in 2" and 1 1/2" (inside diameter) sizes. Two sections of 2" and two sections of 1 1/2" conduit total about 40 feet, and with guys at the 30 foot level and pulleys at 31, 35 and nearly 40 feet I can haul up a variety of wires without much trouble. The costs did mount, as each 40' pole cost nearly $100, plus "aircraft" wire cable and clamps, and I had to use a boom truck to pick them up and hold them vertical until they were guyed. I used cracks in the lava for three of the four posts, and the last one went over an existing 1 1/2" diameter 6 foot high pipe at one property corner (a 10 foot pipe sunk in concrete). I'd imagine if you were to do something similar, the conduit would cost less than here, as you don't have to worry about ocean shipping adding costs to simple (but heavy) materials like conduit and pipe. Once I get it all up, I'll total it up and put some pictures on one of my web sites. thanks --Rick Walter wrote: Rick, Thanks for the input, I have been to the big island, twice. Once in 1972, and once in 1978. I would love to go back sometime, but need to talk my wife into it. Anyway, it also sounds like you have a lot of real estate. I have a pretty big back yard. That is almost made for a sky-wire loop. Here is photo from last year, you can see that I have trees boarding it all the way around. (the house is behind me when I took the photo) The dipole is currently hooked to the tall maple in the back on the left had side of this photo, running back to the house and another maple tree of equal size in the front yard. There are large trees on the right hand side of the property just out of view of this photo in which I could run a few extra supports. http://www.altonillinois.com/newhouse/backyard6.jpg when I bought this house last year, I kind of lucked out. I got a place that is only a half a mile or so from the highest elevation in the county (keep in mind this is Illinois), and I'm only 50 feet or so below that (580 feet) I am leaning towards putting one up. It doesn't sound like it would take much more work. How is your feed line grounded? Thanks. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Walter:
I've tried two methods of feeding the loop(s) here. At first, I just hooked a chunk (technical term for random length I had on hand) of coax to the loop, with center conductor to one side and shield to the other side of the loop. This connected to one port of an MFJ 986 Differential T tuner. The coax wasn't separately, using the ground connection through the MFJ tuner and on to station ground, which is a grid of wires buried under a 1600+ square foot concrete slab that is the floor of my Workshop/studio/ham shack. .A second method I used was connecting 600 ohm ladder line to the loop and bringing it down to an old Johnson Matchbox tuner. The tuner case is connected to station ground, but neither leg of the ladder line is. Both methods got out, and I did pretty well with the coax approach, but I prefer the Johnson Matchbox because I feel it is "cleaner" (another technical term, meaning I just feel better about the balanced tuner than a coax tuner) than the coax type of connection. Propagation has been enough different between the times that I had the coax up and when I put up the ladder line that I can't do a direct A-B comparison, but I think it may have been a little better with the balanced ladder line feeder.... Now that hurricane jimena has passed us by, I'll get moving in getting the big loop up, but now my wife wants me to put a flag/windsock on each of two of the supports, so that may delay me another week or two.... however, when I do put it up, it will go up with 600 ohm ladder line feeding one of my Matchboxes. Putting up a horizontal loop takes a bit of doing if you want it to stay up. For the first few I've done, I've just got out the old slingshot and lobbed a fishing weight over a series of trees, pulling a nylon line behind, which was connected to a 12 gauge wire that would become the actual antenna. Fairly quick and it works well as a semi-permanent antenna as well as a field day "quickie". However, eventually, it will drift downward and get close enough to the ground you may want to re-string the wire. Not a big deal, especially from the looks of the kinds of trees you have. Here, the only trees I have are just too brittle to keep a wire in them for long. They shed limbs on their own at the slightest excuse. For a more permanent installation, I've purchased threaded thickwall (galvanized) electrical conduit in 2" and 1 1/2" (inside diameter) sizes. Two sections of 2" and two sections of 1 1/2" conduit total about 40 feet, and with guys at the 30 foot level and pulleys at 31, 35 and nearly 40 feet I can haul up a variety of wires without much trouble. The costs did mount, as each 40' pole cost nearly $100, plus "aircraft" wire cable and clamps, and I had to use a boom truck to pick them up and hold them vertical until they were guyed. I used cracks in the lava for three of the four posts, and the last one went over an existing 1 1/2" diameter 6 foot high pipe at one property corner (a 10 foot pipe sunk in concrete). I'd imagine if you were to do something similar, the conduit would cost less than here, as you don't have to worry about ocean shipping adding costs to simple (but heavy) materials like conduit and pipe. Once I get it all up, I'll total it up and put some pictures on one of my web sites. thanks --Rick Walter wrote: Rick, Thanks for the input, I have been to the big island, twice. Once in 1972, and once in 1978. I would love to go back sometime, but need to talk my wife into it. Anyway, it also sounds like you have a lot of real estate. I have a pretty big back yard. That is almost made for a sky-wire loop. Here is photo from last year, you can see that I have trees boarding it all the way around. (the house is behind me when I took the photo) The dipole is currently hooked to the tall maple in the back on the left had side of this photo, running back to the house and another maple tree of equal size in the front yard. There are large trees on the right hand side of the property just out of view of this photo in which I could run a few extra supports. http://www.altonillinois.com/newhouse/backyard6.jpg when I bought this house last year, I kind of lucked out. I got a place that is only a half a mile or so from the highest elevation in the county (keep in mind this is Illinois), and I'm only 50 feet or so below that (580 feet) I am leaning towards putting one up. It doesn't sound like it would take much more work. How is your feed line grounded? Thanks. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Rick,
I would love to see a photo of the setup when you get done. It sounds really cool. I have posted some sky-wire questions in a few other groups and some people have told me that I need to use a matching transformer, http://www2.hard-core-dx.com/nordicd...eed/feed1.html to balance the coax and the wire antenna. I'm pretty sure I'm going to run a sky-wire, but I may wait until this fall, after the leaves go. It seems easier without all of the leaves when using a slingshot. I tied mine up with trout line. I bought went I got the 1 oz. egg sinkers and figured it should be able to hold up under bad weather. about the setup, doesn't the ladder line become part of the antenna? thanks. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Rick,
I would love to see a photo of the setup when you get done. It sounds really cool. I have posted some sky-wire questions in a few other groups and some people have told me that I need to use a matching transformer, http://www2.hard-core-dx.com/nordicd...eed/feed1.html to balance the coax and the wire antenna. I'm pretty sure I'm going to run a sky-wire, but I may wait until this fall, after the leaves go. It seems easier without all of the leaves when using a slingshot. I tied mine up with trout line. I bought went I got the 1 oz. egg sinkers and figured it should be able to hold up under bad weather. about the setup, doesn't the ladder line become part of the antenna? thanks. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Walter:
I really didn't notice any deficiency with the antenna directly fed by coax, without any sort of matching transformer. As such, it is definitely possible the coax became a vertical component of the antenna, and I've actually had one person suggest I had a coax vertical antenna with a huge top hat, but personally don't believe that for a minute. With the ladder line, some will tell you the vertical component of the ladder line becomes part of the antenna, and while this may be true in some respect, the voltages on the two conductors of the ladder line are opposite all of the time, so they should cancel out, resulting in no net effect for the vertical section of ladder line feeding the loop. Therefore, the loop pattern should be primarily dependent upon the number of wavelengths long each of the sides is, and the relative polarization at the band you are thinking of. Generally speaking, horizontal loops do pretty well as the frequency increases... and typically are not so fussy that they cannot be readily tuned with a decent antenna tuner. Before I put up the poles, I just used a slingshot and a weight to pull a light but strong twisted nylon line (about the same thickness as a "chalk line") over or through appropriate trees and used it to pull the insulated wire in place. The only pole was a wooden 2x6 that supported the feed corner. With the pole version, nylon ropes hold pulleys that can be raised from the ground, so I can run the loop around the inside of the poles, through the pulleys, then hoist the pulleys up to the top of the poles using the nylon ropes. This gives me the flexibility to lower the wire to change the length (up to the maximum allowed by the inside dimension described by the poles) or add a second conductor below or inside the first one to help broadband the antenna. Art Bell used two conductors about 4 or 5 feet apart vertically, with the lower one a bit shorter than the top one. This may have effectively created the same electrical effect as a 4 or 5 foot diameter element, thus creating a more broadband antenna than a typical loop already is. Once I get the big loop up, I'll be playing with different orientations of a second wire to see how they play... I'll take pictures and put them on one of my web sites once it's up... --Rick AH7H Walter wrote: Rick, I would love to see a photo of the setup when you get done. It sounds really cool. I have posted some sky-wire questions in a few other groups and some people have told me that I need to use a matching transformer, http://www2.hard-core-dx.com/nordicd...eed/feed1.html to balance the coax and the wire antenna. I'm pretty sure I'm going to run a sky-wire, but I may wait until this fall, after the leaves go. It seems easier without all of the leaves when using a slingshot. I tied mine up with trout line. I bought went I got the 1 oz. egg sinkers and figured it should be able to hold up under bad weather. about the setup, doesn't the ladder line become part of the antenna? thanks. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Walter:
I really didn't notice any deficiency with the antenna directly fed by coax, without any sort of matching transformer. As such, it is definitely possible the coax became a vertical component of the antenna, and I've actually had one person suggest I had a coax vertical antenna with a huge top hat, but personally don't believe that for a minute. With the ladder line, some will tell you the vertical component of the ladder line becomes part of the antenna, and while this may be true in some respect, the voltages on the two conductors of the ladder line are opposite all of the time, so they should cancel out, resulting in no net effect for the vertical section of ladder line feeding the loop. Therefore, the loop pattern should be primarily dependent upon the number of wavelengths long each of the sides is, and the relative polarization at the band you are thinking of. Generally speaking, horizontal loops do pretty well as the frequency increases... and typically are not so fussy that they cannot be readily tuned with a decent antenna tuner. Before I put up the poles, I just used a slingshot and a weight to pull a light but strong twisted nylon line (about the same thickness as a "chalk line") over or through appropriate trees and used it to pull the insulated wire in place. The only pole was a wooden 2x6 that supported the feed corner. With the pole version, nylon ropes hold pulleys that can be raised from the ground, so I can run the loop around the inside of the poles, through the pulleys, then hoist the pulleys up to the top of the poles using the nylon ropes. This gives me the flexibility to lower the wire to change the length (up to the maximum allowed by the inside dimension described by the poles) or add a second conductor below or inside the first one to help broadband the antenna. Art Bell used two conductors about 4 or 5 feet apart vertically, with the lower one a bit shorter than the top one. This may have effectively created the same electrical effect as a 4 or 5 foot diameter element, thus creating a more broadband antenna than a typical loop already is. Once I get the big loop up, I'll be playing with different orientations of a second wire to see how they play... I'll take pictures and put them on one of my web sites once it's up... --Rick AH7H Walter wrote: Rick, I would love to see a photo of the setup when you get done. It sounds really cool. I have posted some sky-wire questions in a few other groups and some people have told me that I need to use a matching transformer, http://www2.hard-core-dx.com/nordicd...eed/feed1.html to balance the coax and the wire antenna. I'm pretty sure I'm going to run a sky-wire, but I may wait until this fall, after the leaves go. It seems easier without all of the leaves when using a slingshot. I tied mine up with trout line. I bought went I got the 1 oz. egg sinkers and figured it should be able to hold up under bad weather. about the setup, doesn't the ladder line become part of the antenna? thanks. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
Parallel balun problem with wire loop | Antenna | |||
Distance to Link Coupling in a Loop Antenna | Antenna |