| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Logbook of the World (LoTW) Yahoo Group
I've created a Yahoo discussion group for the ARRL Logbook of the
World. Any LoTW user is invited to join at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ARRL-LOTW See you there. |
"Kevin Gibson" wrote in message om... I've created a Yahoo discussion group for the ARRL Logbook of the World. Any LoTW user is invited to join at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ARRL-LOTW See you there. Why not discuss it here? LOTW might be interesting once it is working. -- ... Hank Hank: http://horedson.home.att.net W0RLI: http://w0rli.home.att.net |
"Kevin Gibson" wrote in message om... I've created a Yahoo discussion group for the ARRL Logbook of the World. Any LoTW user is invited to join at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ARRL-LOTW See you there. Why not discuss it here? LOTW might be interesting once it is working. -- ... Hank Hank: http://horedson.home.att.net W0RLI: http://w0rli.home.att.net |
I agree, more people need to submit logs. I have 1280 log entries and
only 3 hits! Come on, put those logs up on LoTW! Terry KC3AK Hank Oredson wrote: "Kevin Gibson" wrote in message om... I've created a Yahoo discussion group for the ARRL Logbook of the World. Any LoTW user is invited to join at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ARRL-LOTW See you there. Why not discuss it here? LOTW might be interesting once it is working. |
I agree, more people need to submit logs. I have 1280 log entries and
only 3 hits! Come on, put those logs up on LoTW! Terry KC3AK Hank Oredson wrote: "Kevin Gibson" wrote in message om... I've created a Yahoo discussion group for the ARRL Logbook of the World. Any LoTW user is invited to join at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ARRL-LOTW See you there. Why not discuss it here? LOTW might be interesting once it is working. |
About 6500 log entries, and 20 hits.
But it is simply too complex to use ... they gotta fix that. -- ... Hank Hank: http://horedson.home.att.net W0RLI: http://w0rli.home.att.net "KC3AK" wrote in message ... I agree, more people need to submit logs. I have 1280 log entries and only 3 hits! Come on, put those logs up on LoTW! Terry KC3AK Hank Oredson wrote: "Kevin Gibson" wrote in message om... I've created a Yahoo discussion group for the ARRL Logbook of the World. Any LoTW user is invited to join at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ARRL-LOTW See you there. Why not discuss it here? LOTW might be interesting once it is working. |
About 6500 log entries, and 20 hits.
But it is simply too complex to use ... they gotta fix that. -- ... Hank Hank: http://horedson.home.att.net W0RLI: http://w0rli.home.att.net "KC3AK" wrote in message ... I agree, more people need to submit logs. I have 1280 log entries and only 3 hits! Come on, put those logs up on LoTW! Terry KC3AK Hank Oredson wrote: "Kevin Gibson" wrote in message om... I've created a Yahoo discussion group for the ARRL Logbook of the World. Any LoTW user is invited to join at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ARRL-LOTW See you there. Why not discuss it here? LOTW might be interesting once it is working. |
Hank Oredson wrote:
About 6500 log entries, and 20 hits. But it is simply too complex to use ... they gotta fix that. I believe they have found a good compromise between security, complexity and ease of use. I particularly applaud them for providing a working Linux client, together with the source code. With that, it should be easy to integrate LOTW into other log applications, either natively or as a plug in. There is no other way than a digital certificate to positively and uniquely identifiy a participant, but in a couple of years we will all have a digital identity and sending in snail mail to verify one's existence will no longer be necessary. Peter Lemken DF5JT Berlin -- Mail an die im From: angegebene Adresse stellt eine Beauftragung zur Überprüfung der Mailfunktion des Absenders dar und wird mit einer Bearbeitungsgebühr von EUR 1000,- in Rechnung gestellt. |
Hank Oredson wrote:
About 6500 log entries, and 20 hits. But it is simply too complex to use ... they gotta fix that. I believe they have found a good compromise between security, complexity and ease of use. I particularly applaud them for providing a working Linux client, together with the source code. With that, it should be easy to integrate LOTW into other log applications, either natively or as a plug in. There is no other way than a digital certificate to positively and uniquely identifiy a participant, but in a couple of years we will all have a digital identity and sending in snail mail to verify one's existence will no longer be necessary. Peter Lemken DF5JT Berlin -- Mail an die im From: angegebene Adresse stellt eine Beauftragung zur Überprüfung der Mailfunktion des Absenders dar und wird mit einer Bearbeitungsgebühr von EUR 1000,- in Rechnung gestellt. |
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 06:20:26 +0000, Peter Lemken wrote:
I particularly applaud them for providing a working Linux client, together with the source code. With that, it should be easy to integrate LOTW into other log applications, either natively or as a plug in. Have you studied the license under which LoTW is distributed? I am unsure whether linking against their libraries is allowed at all: 5. Products derived from or including this software may not use "Logbook of the World" or "LoTW" or any other American Radio Relay League, Incorporated trademarks or servicemarks in their names without prior written permission of the ARRL. So I would have to ask permission to link against the LoTW libraries? So much for distributing source-code. If only they would have picked a more sensible license, I might have started using LoTW. Their license rules kindof suck, read the LICENSE file included with the source code. Peter Lemken DF5JT Berlin Joop, PG4I |
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 06:20:26 +0000, Peter Lemken wrote:
I particularly applaud them for providing a working Linux client, together with the source code. With that, it should be easy to integrate LOTW into other log applications, either natively or as a plug in. Have you studied the license under which LoTW is distributed? I am unsure whether linking against their libraries is allowed at all: 5. Products derived from or including this software may not use "Logbook of the World" or "LoTW" or any other American Radio Relay League, Incorporated trademarks or servicemarks in their names without prior written permission of the ARRL. So I would have to ask permission to link against the LoTW libraries? So much for distributing source-code. If only they would have picked a more sensible license, I might have started using LoTW. Their license rules kindof suck, read the LICENSE file included with the source code. Peter Lemken DF5JT Berlin Joop, PG4I |
Joop Stakenborg wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 06:20:26 +0000, Peter Lemken wrote: I particularly applaud them for providing a working Linux client, together with the source code. With that, it should be easy to integrate LOTW into other log applications, either natively or as a plug in. Have you studied the license under which LoTW is distributed? I am unsure whether linking against their libraries is allowed at all: 5. Products derived from or including this software may not use "Logbook of the World" or "LoTW" or any other American Radio Relay League, Incorporated trademarks or servicemarks in their names without prior written permission of the ARRL. So I would have to ask permission to link against the LoTW libraries? So much for distributing source-code. I actually read the license before the posting and stumbled upon this paragraph. However, please see that it refers to the *name* of a product you actually want to use, it is a trademark restriction, not a copyright restriction. In a previous paragraph you will find that the source can freely distributed and *modified*, and that's what counts. If only they would have picked a more sensible license, I might have started using LoTW. Their license rules kindof suck, read the LICENSE file included with the source code. I feel you may want to read it again from a different angle. As far as I can see, there are no restrictions of use, either as plugins or integration into a new product, quite on the contrary. The introductory sentence makes this rather clear: "Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met" Peter Lemken DF5JT Berlin -- Mail an die im From: angegebene Adresse stellt eine Beauftragung zur Überprüfung der Mailfunktion des Absenders dar und wird mit einer Bearbeitungsgebühr von EUR 1000,- in Rechnung gestellt. |
Joop Stakenborg wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 06:20:26 +0000, Peter Lemken wrote: I particularly applaud them for providing a working Linux client, together with the source code. With that, it should be easy to integrate LOTW into other log applications, either natively or as a plug in. Have you studied the license under which LoTW is distributed? I am unsure whether linking against their libraries is allowed at all: 5. Products derived from or including this software may not use "Logbook of the World" or "LoTW" or any other American Radio Relay League, Incorporated trademarks or servicemarks in their names without prior written permission of the ARRL. So I would have to ask permission to link against the LoTW libraries? So much for distributing source-code. I actually read the license before the posting and stumbled upon this paragraph. However, please see that it refers to the *name* of a product you actually want to use, it is a trademark restriction, not a copyright restriction. In a previous paragraph you will find that the source can freely distributed and *modified*, and that's what counts. If only they would have picked a more sensible license, I might have started using LoTW. Their license rules kindof suck, read the LICENSE file included with the source code. I feel you may want to read it again from a different angle. As far as I can see, there are no restrictions of use, either as plugins or integration into a new product, quite on the contrary. The introductory sentence makes this rather clear: "Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met" Peter Lemken DF5JT Berlin -- Mail an die im From: angegebene Adresse stellt eine Beauftragung zur Überprüfung der Mailfunktion des Absenders dar und wird mit einer Bearbeitungsgebühr von EUR 1000,- in Rechnung gestellt. |
On 29 Sep 2003 15:56:18 GMT, Peter Lemken wrote:
Joop Stakenborg wrote: On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 06:20:26 +0000, Peter Lemken wrote: I particularly applaud them for providing a working Linux client, together with the source code. With that, it should be easy to integrate LOTW into other log applications, either natively or as a plug in. Have you studied the license under which LoTW is distributed? I am unsure whether linking against their libraries is allowed at all: 5. Products derived from or including this software may not use "Logbook of the World" or "LoTW" or any other American Radio Relay League, Incorporated trademarks or servicemarks in their names without prior written permission of the ARRL. So I would have to ask permission to link against the LoTW libraries? So much for distributing source-code. I actually read the license before the posting and stumbled upon this paragraph. However, please see that it refers to the *name* of a product you actually want to use, it is a trademark restriction, not a copyright restriction. In a previous paragraph you will find that the source can freely distributed and *modified*, and that's what counts. If only they would have picked a more sensible license, I might have started using LoTW. Their license rules kindof suck, read the LICENSE file included with the source code. I feel you may want to read it again from a different angle. As far as I can see, there are no restrictions of use, either as plugins or integration into a new product, quite on the contrary. The introductory sentence makes this rather clear: "Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met" - hmm... sorta BSDish, isn't it? at least the source is available! this should help adoption by the Linux/BSD crowd? Peter Lemken DF5JT Berlin -- Mail an die im From: angegebene Adresse stellt eine Beauftragung zur Überprüfung der Mailfunktion des Absenders dar und wird mit einer Bearbeitungsgebühr von EUR 1000,- in Rechnung gestellt. |
On 29 Sep 2003 15:56:18 GMT, Peter Lemken wrote:
Joop Stakenborg wrote: On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 06:20:26 +0000, Peter Lemken wrote: I particularly applaud them for providing a working Linux client, together with the source code. With that, it should be easy to integrate LOTW into other log applications, either natively or as a plug in. Have you studied the license under which LoTW is distributed? I am unsure whether linking against their libraries is allowed at all: 5. Products derived from or including this software may not use "Logbook of the World" or "LoTW" or any other American Radio Relay League, Incorporated trademarks or servicemarks in their names without prior written permission of the ARRL. So I would have to ask permission to link against the LoTW libraries? So much for distributing source-code. I actually read the license before the posting and stumbled upon this paragraph. However, please see that it refers to the *name* of a product you actually want to use, it is a trademark restriction, not a copyright restriction. In a previous paragraph you will find that the source can freely distributed and *modified*, and that's what counts. If only they would have picked a more sensible license, I might have started using LoTW. Their license rules kindof suck, read the LICENSE file included with the source code. I feel you may want to read it again from a different angle. As far as I can see, there are no restrictions of use, either as plugins or integration into a new product, quite on the contrary. The introductory sentence makes this rather clear: "Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met" - hmm... sorta BSDish, isn't it? at least the source is available! this should help adoption by the Linux/BSD crowd? Peter Lemken DF5JT Berlin -- Mail an die im From: angegebene Adresse stellt eine Beauftragung zur Überprüfung der Mailfunktion des Absenders dar und wird mit einer Bearbeitungsgebühr von EUR 1000,- in Rechnung gestellt. |
|
|
re "easy to integrate LOTW into other log applications" -- where's the
documented, public API? 73, Dave, AA6YQ "Peter Lemken" wrote in message ... Hank Oredson wrote: About 6500 log entries, and 20 hits. But it is simply too complex to use ... they gotta fix that. I believe they have found a good compromise between security, complexity and ease of use. I particularly applaud them for providing a working Linux client, together with the source code. With that, it should be easy to integrate LOTW into other log applications, either natively or as a plug in. There is no other way than a digital certificate to positively and uniquely identifiy a participant, but in a couple of years we will all have a digital identity and sending in snail mail to verify one's existence will no longer be necessary. Peter Lemken DF5JT Berlin -- Mail an die im From: angegebene Adresse stellt eine Beauftragung zur Überprüfung der Mailfunktion des Absenders dar und wird mit einer Bearbeitungsgebühr von EUR 1000,- in Rechnung gestellt. |
re "easy to integrate LOTW into other log applications" -- where's the
documented, public API? 73, Dave, AA6YQ "Peter Lemken" wrote in message ... Hank Oredson wrote: About 6500 log entries, and 20 hits. But it is simply too complex to use ... they gotta fix that. I believe they have found a good compromise between security, complexity and ease of use. I particularly applaud them for providing a working Linux client, together with the source code. With that, it should be easy to integrate LOTW into other log applications, either natively or as a plug in. There is no other way than a digital certificate to positively and uniquely identifiy a participant, but in a couple of years we will all have a digital identity and sending in snail mail to verify one's existence will no longer be necessary. Peter Lemken DF5JT Berlin -- Mail an die im From: angegebene Adresse stellt eine Beauftragung zur Überprüfung der Mailfunktion des Absenders dar und wird mit einer Bearbeitungsgebühr von EUR 1000,- in Rechnung gestellt. |
Dave, AA6YQ wrote:
re "easy to integrate LOTW into other log applications" -- where's the documented, public API? In the source code? Peter Lemken DF5JT Berlin -- Mail an die im From: angegebene Adresse stellt eine Beauftragung zur Überprüfung der Mailfunktion des Absenders dar und wird mit einer Bearbeitungsgebühr von EUR 1000,- in Rechnung gestellt. |
Dave, AA6YQ wrote:
re "easy to integrate LOTW into other log applications" -- where's the documented, public API? In the source code? Peter Lemken DF5JT Berlin -- Mail an die im From: angegebene Adresse stellt eine Beauftragung zur Überprüfung der Mailfunktion des Absenders dar und wird mit einer Bearbeitungsgebühr von EUR 1000,- in Rechnung gestellt. |
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:49:29 GMT, wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:23:55 GMT, wrote: - hmm... sorta BSDish, isn't it? at least the source is available! this should help adoption by the Linux/BSD crowd? Are all three of them hams ? - but does that matter? whether it's one, two, or a dozen or a million, the ability to participate is important... - for accessibility issues, perhaps this will help blind hams too? GNOME (http://www.gnome.org) has good support for such applications, and with some help from fellow programmers, perhaps the ability to contribute or use electronic qls'ng/logging can be extended to fellow amateur radio operators around the world... - just my $0.02 73, Jim KH2D |
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:49:29 GMT, wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:23:55 GMT, wrote: - hmm... sorta BSDish, isn't it? at least the source is available! this should help adoption by the Linux/BSD crowd? Are all three of them hams ? - but does that matter? whether it's one, two, or a dozen or a million, the ability to participate is important... - for accessibility issues, perhaps this will help blind hams too? GNOME (http://www.gnome.org) has good support for such applications, and with some help from fellow programmers, perhaps the ability to contribute or use electronic qls'ng/logging can be extended to fellow amateur radio operators around the world... - just my $0.02 73, Jim KH2D |
"Peter Lemken" wrote in message ... Dave, AA6YQ wrote: re "easy to integrate LOTW into other log applications" -- where's the documented, public API? In the source code? Peter Lemken I've not located the sources yet. Where does one get them? -- ... Hank Hank: http://horedson.home.att.net W0RLI: http://w0rli.home.att.net |
"Peter Lemken" wrote in message ... Dave, AA6YQ wrote: re "easy to integrate LOTW into other log applications" -- where's the documented, public API? In the source code? Peter Lemken I've not located the sources yet. Where does one get them? -- ... Hank Hank: http://horedson.home.att.net W0RLI: http://w0rli.home.att.net |
Hank Oredson wrote:
I've not located the sources yet. Where have you looked? Where does one get them? www.google.com Peter Lemken Berlin -- Mail an die im From: angegebene Adresse stellt eine Beauftragung zur Überprüfung der Mailfunktion des Absenders dar und wird mit einer Bearbeitungsgebühr von EUR 1000,- in Rechnung gestellt. |
Hank Oredson wrote:
I've not located the sources yet. Where have you looked? Where does one get them? www.google.com Peter Lemken Berlin -- Mail an die im From: angegebene Adresse stellt eine Beauftragung zur Überprüfung der Mailfunktion des Absenders dar und wird mit einer Bearbeitungsgebühr von EUR 1000,- in Rechnung gestellt. |
"Peter Lemken" wrote in message ... Hank Oredson wrote: I've not located the sources yet. Where have you looked? ARRL, TrustedQSL, SourceForge. Where does one get them? www.google.com The only sources I can find are just the little applications for Trusted QSL. Cannot find anything with an API to the database. Seems that API is via email, or the upload page on the web site. Maybe I missed something ... -- ... Hank Hank: http://horedson.home.att.net W0RLI: http://w0rli.home.att.net |
"Peter Lemken" wrote in message ... Hank Oredson wrote: I've not located the sources yet. Where have you looked? ARRL, TrustedQSL, SourceForge. Where does one get them? www.google.com The only sources I can find are just the little applications for Trusted QSL. Cannot find anything with an API to the database. Seems that API is via email, or the upload page on the web site. Maybe I missed something ... -- ... Hank Hank: http://horedson.home.att.net W0RLI: http://w0rli.home.att.net |
Hank Oredson wrote:
The only sources I can find are just the little applications for Trusted QSL. Cannot find anything with an API to the database. Seems that API is via email, or the upload page on the web site. Maybe I missed something ... I doubt you searched with the relevant keywords. "lotw" "arrl" http://trustedqsl.sourceforge.net/lotwspec.pdf as the first hit on google. Really. Peter Lemken Berlin -- Mail an die im From: angegebene Adresse stellt eine Beauftragung zur Überprüfung der Mailfunktion des Absenders dar und wird mit einer Bearbeitungsgebühr von EUR 1000,- in Rechnung gestellt. |
Hank Oredson wrote:
The only sources I can find are just the little applications for Trusted QSL. Cannot find anything with an API to the database. Seems that API is via email, or the upload page on the web site. Maybe I missed something ... I doubt you searched with the relevant keywords. "lotw" "arrl" http://trustedqsl.sourceforge.net/lotwspec.pdf as the first hit on google. Really. Peter Lemken Berlin -- Mail an die im From: angegebene Adresse stellt eine Beauftragung zur Überprüfung der Mailfunktion des Absenders dar und wird mit einer Bearbeitungsgebühr von EUR 1000,- in Rechnung gestellt. |
"Peter Lemken" wrote in message ... Hank Oredson wrote: The only sources I can find are just the little applications for Trusted QSL. Cannot find anything with an API to the database. Seems that API is via email, or the upload page on the web site. Maybe I missed something ... I doubt you searched with the relevant keywords. "lotw" "arrl" http://trustedqsl.sourceforge.net/lotwspec.pdf as the first hit on google. Really. 3rd hit. Already have that document. No API specification in that document. -- ... Hank Hank: http://horedson.home.att.net W0RLI: http://w0rli.home.att.net |
"Peter Lemken" wrote in message ... Hank Oredson wrote: The only sources I can find are just the little applications for Trusted QSL. Cannot find anything with an API to the database. Seems that API is via email, or the upload page on the web site. Maybe I missed something ... I doubt you searched with the relevant keywords. "lotw" "arrl" http://trustedqsl.sourceforge.net/lotwspec.pdf as the first hit on google. Really. 3rd hit. Already have that document. No API specification in that document. -- ... Hank Hank: http://horedson.home.att.net W0RLI: http://w0rli.home.att.net |
Hank Oredson wrote:
3rd hit. Already have that document. No API specification in that document. OK, Hank, you seem to need spoonfeeding: http://www.trustedqsl.org/ Not very obvious and *very* hard to find. But it has an FAQ. http://cesnet.dl.sourceforge.net/sou...qsllib-doc.zip That's on Sourceforge. You *did* look there, didn't you? Peter Lemken DF5JT Berlin -- Mail an die im From: angegebene Adresse stellt eine Beauftragung zur Überprüfung der Mailfunktion des Absenders dar und wird mit einer Bearbeitungsgebühr von EUR 1000,- in Rechnung gestellt. |
Hank Oredson wrote:
3rd hit. Already have that document. No API specification in that document. OK, Hank, you seem to need spoonfeeding: http://www.trustedqsl.org/ Not very obvious and *very* hard to find. But it has an FAQ. http://cesnet.dl.sourceforge.net/sou...qsllib-doc.zip That's on Sourceforge. You *did* look there, didn't you? Peter Lemken DF5JT Berlin -- Mail an die im From: angegebene Adresse stellt eine Beauftragung zur Überprüfung der Mailfunktion des Absenders dar und wird mit einer Bearbeitungsgebühr von EUR 1000,- in Rechnung gestellt. |
"Peter Lemken" wrote in message ... Hank Oredson wrote: 3rd hit. Already have that document. No API specification in that document. OK, Hank, you seem to need spoonfeeding: http://www.trustedqsl.org/ Not very obvious and *very* hard to find. But it has an FAQ. http://cesnet.dl.sourceforge.net/sou...qsllib-doc.zip That's on Sourceforge. You *did* look there, didn't you? Peter Lemken DF5JT Berlin Yes, I have this also. The same for everything on SourceForge. This is *not* what I look for. It is the description of the library you must use to do things on the local machine. Of course this is needed, and I have it already. I'm looking for the next part. Maybe the term "data interchange protocol" will be better. I am looking for the API *to the LotW database*. One could reverse engineer an API from the web page code. It would be better if I had the specification instead. eQSL provides such a specification for their database. I am aware of the architecture, understand how the certificates are used, have my own database and software for dealing with logs, station identification, DX entities, have ADIF reading and writing functions for that database, etc. What I have not yet found is the API into the LotW database, so that I can create my own client to view, modify, delete and insert QSO data. For eQSL this is simple. Now I want to do it for LotW. -- ... Hank Hank: http://horedson.home.att.net W0RLI: http://w0rli.home.att.net |
"Peter Lemken" wrote in message ... Hank Oredson wrote: 3rd hit. Already have that document. No API specification in that document. OK, Hank, you seem to need spoonfeeding: http://www.trustedqsl.org/ Not very obvious and *very* hard to find. But it has an FAQ. http://cesnet.dl.sourceforge.net/sou...qsllib-doc.zip That's on Sourceforge. You *did* look there, didn't you? Peter Lemken DF5JT Berlin Yes, I have this also. The same for everything on SourceForge. This is *not* what I look for. It is the description of the library you must use to do things on the local machine. Of course this is needed, and I have it already. I'm looking for the next part. Maybe the term "data interchange protocol" will be better. I am looking for the API *to the LotW database*. One could reverse engineer an API from the web page code. It would be better if I had the specification instead. eQSL provides such a specification for their database. I am aware of the architecture, understand how the certificates are used, have my own database and software for dealing with logs, station identification, DX entities, have ADIF reading and writing functions for that database, etc. What I have not yet found is the API into the LotW database, so that I can create my own client to view, modify, delete and insert QSO data. For eQSL this is simple. Now I want to do it for LotW. -- ... Hank Hank: http://horedson.home.att.net W0RLI: http://w0rli.home.att.net |
There is no API in http://trustedqsl.sourceforge.net/lotwspec.pdf , nor in
any other available document. I presume that the earlier "its in the code" was a joke, though not a very funny one. 73, Dave, AA6YQ "Peter Lemken" wrote in message ... Hank Oredson wrote: The only sources I can find are just the little applications for Trusted QSL. Cannot find anything with an API to the database. Seems that API is via email, or the upload page on the web site. Maybe I missed something ... I doubt you searched with the relevant keywords. "lotw" "arrl" http://trustedqsl.sourceforge.net/lotwspec.pdf as the first hit on google. Really. Peter Lemken Berlin -- Mail an die im From: angegebene Adresse stellt eine Beauftragung zur Überprüfung der Mailfunktion des Absenders dar und wird mit einer Bearbeitungsgebühr von EUR 1000,- in Rechnung gestellt. |
There is no API in http://trustedqsl.sourceforge.net/lotwspec.pdf , nor in
any other available document. I presume that the earlier "its in the code" was a joke, though not a very funny one. 73, Dave, AA6YQ "Peter Lemken" wrote in message ... Hank Oredson wrote: The only sources I can find are just the little applications for Trusted QSL. Cannot find anything with an API to the database. Seems that API is via email, or the upload page on the web site. Maybe I missed something ... I doubt you searched with the relevant keywords. "lotw" "arrl" http://trustedqsl.sourceforge.net/lotwspec.pdf as the first hit on google. Really. Peter Lemken Berlin -- Mail an die im From: angegebene Adresse stellt eine Beauftragung zur Überprüfung der Mailfunktion des Absenders dar und wird mit einer Bearbeitungsgebühr von EUR 1000,- in Rechnung gestellt. |
A pile of code is not an API, its a pile of code. An API is a designated,
documented interface designed to be stable (in an upwardly-compatible way) over time so that client applications can interact reliably. I'm beginning to think you weren't joking. 73, Dave, AA6YQ "Peter Lemken" wrote in message ... Hank Oredson wrote: 3rd hit. Already have that document. No API specification in that document. OK, Hank, you seem to need spoonfeeding: http://www.trustedqsl.org/ Not very obvious and *very* hard to find. But it has an FAQ. http://cesnet.dl.sourceforge.net/sou...qsllib-doc.zip That's on Sourceforge. You *did* look there, didn't you? Peter Lemken DF5JT Berlin -- Mail an die im From: angegebene Adresse stellt eine Beauftragung zur Überprüfung der Mailfunktion des Absenders dar und wird mit einer Bearbeitungsgebühr von EUR 1000,- in Rechnung gestellt. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:38 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com