![]() |
avoiding the ham bands won't protect the other users of HF.
NTIA and its USG "clients" will, hopefully, be one of our strongest allies ... we should not take a "protect us and the heck with everyone else" approach ... to do so would dillute our potential support. I saw a report yesterday to the effect that some AM stations were being wiped out by BPL noise. The number of people needing their daily fix of Dr Laura and Rush PooBah easily outnumber the ARRL membership, so this is good news for us. Derek aa5bt |
Sure,
What I do not understand is that anybody with a scientific education can see easily: big radiating short-wave antenna will transmit signals all over the earth, so should be unlawful by any means as it will not be limited to polluting the ether in the US of A but the globe. Anyway, I think the governing power never made a big issue of that (radiation fallout etc was never kept inside the frontiers either and the cancer rate keeps going up! Guess twice why) Don't really see what international goodwill in your rules means nowadays. BTW BPL experiments in several places in the E.U. showed clearly the technique is not up to standard even if some results are kept secret too. So just keep arguing counter and I hope every ham at least writes just one letter to his representative in the governing body, imho the only way to make any impact. "Derek Wills" schreef in bericht ... avoiding the ham bands won't protect the other users of HF. NTIA and its USG "clients" will, hopefully, be one of our strongest allies ... we should not take a "protect us and the heck with everyone else" approach ... to do so would dillute our potential support. I saw a report yesterday to the effect that some AM stations were being wiped out by BPL noise. The number of people needing their daily fix of Dr Laura and Rush PooBah easily outnumber the ARRL membership, so this is good news for us. Derek aa5bt |
Sure,
What I do not understand is that anybody with a scientific education can see easily: big radiating short-wave antenna will transmit signals all over the earth, so should be unlawful by any means as it will not be limited to polluting the ether in the US of A but the globe. Anyway, I think the governing power never made a big issue of that (radiation fallout etc was never kept inside the frontiers either and the cancer rate keeps going up! Guess twice why) Don't really see what international goodwill in your rules means nowadays. BTW BPL experiments in several places in the E.U. showed clearly the technique is not up to standard even if some results are kept secret too. So just keep arguing counter and I hope every ham at least writes just one letter to his representative in the governing body, imho the only way to make any impact. "Derek Wills" schreef in bericht ... avoiding the ham bands won't protect the other users of HF. NTIA and its USG "clients" will, hopefully, be one of our strongest allies ... we should not take a "protect us and the heck with everyone else" approach ... to do so would dillute our potential support. I saw a report yesterday to the effect that some AM stations were being wiped out by BPL noise. The number of people needing their daily fix of Dr Laura and Rush PooBah easily outnumber the ARRL membership, so this is good news for us. Derek aa5bt |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com