On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 02:43:40 GMT, Doug Smith W9WI
wrote:

Too bad there's no way to gather reliable evidence for a
disqualification....

Also too bad that there is nobody who runs major contests, including
CQ magazine and the ARRL, that are willing to DQ ANYBODY for ANYTHING.
The rules are run what you brung and don't worry about the rules......

I've seen firm evidence of cheating submitted to both, with no action
taken by either.

73, Jim KH2D

On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 22:23:18 GMT, wrote:

On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 02:43:40 GMT, Doug Smith W9WI
wrote:

Too bad there's no way to gather reliable evidence for a
disqualification....

Also too bad that there is nobody who runs major contests, including
CQ magazine and the ARRL, that are willing to DQ ANYBODY for ANYTHING.
The rules are run what you brung and don't worry about the rules......

I've seen firm evidence of cheating submitted to both, with no action
taken by either.

73, Jim KH2D


Such as?
Barry W2UP
--
Note - Remove the X from my e-mail address for direct replies

On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 22:23:18 GMT, wrote:

On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 02:43:40 GMT, Doug Smith W9WI
wrote:

Too bad there's no way to gather reliable evidence for a
disqualification....

Also too bad that there is nobody who runs major contests, including
CQ magazine and the ARRL, that are willing to DQ ANYBODY for ANYTHING.
The rules are run what you brung and don't worry about the rules......

I've seen firm evidence of cheating submitted to both, with no action
taken by either.

73, Jim KH2D


Such as?
Barry W2UP
--
Note - Remove the X from my e-mail address for direct replies