| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Honus wrote:
KAIJ carries Dr. Scott on 5755. Yep, that makes sense... (IIRC KAIJ is in New Mexico) I've also been picking up more than my share of images in the shortwave ranges, so this seems to make some sense to me despite the jargon. g. I'm ready to mail my Grundig back to China with a letter enclosed telling them where they can send it from there. This whole shortwave/AM DX experiencehas been extremely frustrating. I might suggest you'll have more luck lower in the AM band. There's more interference between stations but all the signals are stronger and chances are anything you hear will actually be broadcasting on the frequency you hear it on. The spurious receptions are, I'm afraid, generally a function of the quality of the receiver. An inexpensive receiver is going to have more of these. Scant comfort, I know... -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66 http://www.w9wi.com |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Doug Smith W9WI" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: KAIJ carries Dr. Scott on 5755. Yep, that makes sense... (IIRC KAIJ is in New Mexico) I've also been picking up more than my share of images in the shortwave ranges, so this seems to make some sense to me despite the jargon. g. I'm ready to mail my Grundig back to China with a letter enclosed telling them where they can send it from there. This whole shortwave/AM DXexperience has been extremely frustrating. I might suggest you'll have more luck lower in the AM band. There's more interference between stations but all the signals are stronger and chances are anything you hear will actually be broadcasting on the frequency you hear it on. The spurious receptions are, I'm afraid, generally a function of the quality of the receiver. An inexpensive receiver is going to have more of these. Scant comfort, I know... gbg That's okay. I can face reality. It's funny, though. I did a lot of research into SW radios before I went with the S350, and I don't remember anyone ever complaining about images, etc. Now I almost wish I'd gone with the YB400 as I'd originally intended. Oh well....live and learn. ![]() |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Doug Smith W9WI" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: KAIJ carries Dr. Scott on 5755. Yep, that makes sense... (IIRC KAIJ is in New Mexico) I've also been picking up more than my share of images in the shortwave ranges, so this seems to make some sense to me despite the jargon. g. I'm ready to mail my Grundig back to China with a letter enclosed telling them where they can send it from there. This whole shortwave/AM DXexperience has been extremely frustrating. I might suggest you'll have more luck lower in the AM band. There's more interference between stations but all the signals are stronger and chances are anything you hear will actually be broadcasting on the frequency you hear it on. The spurious receptions are, I'm afraid, generally a function of the quality of the receiver. An inexpensive receiver is going to have more of these. Scant comfort, I know... gbg That's okay. I can face reality. It's funny, though. I did a lot of research into SW radios before I went with the S350, and I don't remember anyone ever complaining about images, etc. Now I almost wish I'd gone with the YB400 as I'd originally intended. Oh well....live and learn. ![]() |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|