RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Dx (https://www.radiobanter.com/dx/)
-   -   New to DX with limited resources (https://www.radiobanter.com/dx/9932-new-dx-limited-resources.html)

Doug Smith W9WI October 26th 04 05:54 AM

Peter Dougherty wrote:
band or new mode. In contests I find a steady cluster connection to be
a lifesaver (no more busted calls -- of course, you have to enter as
"assisted").


Dunno, seeing some of the busted spots that show up during a contest one
has to begin to wonder whether *not* having cluster constitutes
"assistance"grin!
--
Doug Smith W9WI
Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66
http://www.w9wi.com


John Hague October 26th 04 01:08 PM

On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:37:25 +0100, Walt Davidson
wrote:

On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:22:47 -0400, "G. Doughty"
wrote:

Looking to give DX a try. I have two attic dipoles for 20 and 40
meters. I
have a ten-tec scout 555 that runs 50 watts wide open. Anyways, I am
trying
to find a "node" to use on my laptop but am unsure what I need. I
think all
I need is a 10m radio (I have an htx 10) antenna (easy enough for a
dipole
in the attic) and a computer. Is that true? Also, with the computer,
I am
aware of Telnet, but how do I access a local node? I am probably
talking
out of my arse, but I think it would be interesting to get it all
hooked up.
I use a computer logger but I think I can access the node through a
phone if
need be. If it sounds like I'm confused, I am. A little help will go a
long way.

Thanks so much


I can't believe I'm reading this.

Is a connection to a packet cluster now a prerequisite for working DX?
How did we manage in those far-off days before there were any packet
clusters?

73 de G3NYY

I agree to some extent. Whilst the use of packet cluster can aid DXing,in
my experience it can sometimes be frustrating. This is because, if a spot
shows up on the cluster, then EVERYONE reading the spots will be aware of
it - quite often with the inevitable pile-up. This is often difficult to
break with 100W and low-height wire antennas. However, it's so much more
rewarding to tune the band(s) and find a rare station calling CQ and be
the first one to reply.

Best 73

John, G4GOY .... 197 DXCC entities in the last 3 years

John Hague October 26th 04 01:08 PM

On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:37:25 +0100, Walt Davidson
wrote:

On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:22:47 -0400, "G. Doughty"
wrote:

Looking to give DX a try. I have two attic dipoles for 20 and 40
meters. I
have a ten-tec scout 555 that runs 50 watts wide open. Anyways, I am
trying
to find a "node" to use on my laptop but am unsure what I need. I
think all
I need is a 10m radio (I have an htx 10) antenna (easy enough for a
dipole
in the attic) and a computer. Is that true? Also, with the computer,
I am
aware of Telnet, but how do I access a local node? I am probably
talking
out of my arse, but I think it would be interesting to get it all
hooked up.
I use a computer logger but I think I can access the node through a
phone if
need be. If it sounds like I'm confused, I am. A little help will go a
long way.

Thanks so much


I can't believe I'm reading this.

Is a connection to a packet cluster now a prerequisite for working DX?
How did we manage in those far-off days before there were any packet
clusters?

73 de G3NYY

I agree to some extent. Whilst the use of packet cluster can aid DXing,in
my experience it can sometimes be frustrating. This is because, if a spot
shows up on the cluster, then EVERYONE reading the spots will be aware of
it - quite often with the inevitable pile-up. This is often difficult to
break with 100W and low-height wire antennas. However, it's so much more
rewarding to tune the band(s) and find a rare station calling CQ and be
the first one to reply.

Best 73

John, G4GOY .... 197 DXCC entities in the last 3 years

Keyboard In The Wilderness October 26th 04 03:11 PM

Sir Walter -- we did it the old fashioned way - we earned it !
Listen listen listen tune tune tune
and you will be the first to work the rare DX

The first cluster spot is made by a DXer who performed the above

--
The Anon Keyboard
I doubt, therefore I might be



"Walt Davidson" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:22:47 -0400, "G. Doughty"
wrote:


I can't believe I'm reading this.

Is a connection to a packet cluster now a prerequisite for working DX?
How did we manage in those far-off days before there were any packet
clusters?

73 de G3NYY

--
Walt Davidson Email: g3nyy @despammed.com




Keyboard In The Wilderness October 26th 04 03:11 PM

Sir Walter -- we did it the old fashioned way - we earned it !
Listen listen listen tune tune tune
and you will be the first to work the rare DX

The first cluster spot is made by a DXer who performed the above

--
The Anon Keyboard
I doubt, therefore I might be



"Walt Davidson" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:22:47 -0400, "G. Doughty"
wrote:


I can't believe I'm reading this.

Is a connection to a packet cluster now a prerequisite for working DX?
How did we manage in those far-off days before there were any packet
clusters?

73 de G3NYY

--
Walt Davidson Email: g3nyy @despammed.com




Peter Dougherty October 26th 04 07:06 PM

Doug Smith W9WI said :

Peter Dougherty wrote:
band or new mode. In contests I find a steady cluster connection to be
a lifesaver (no more busted calls -- of course, you have to enter as
"assisted").


Dunno, seeing some of the busted spots that show up during a contest one
has to begin to wonder whether *not* having cluster constitutes
"assistance"grin!


Yeah, that's true too, but on the whole between listening and seeing
the spots, I've not busted one in any of the contests I've played in
yet.

73 de Peter, W2IRT
(ex-AB2NZ, VE3THX)

Please reply to Double-you Two Eye Are Tee at Arrl.net

Peter Dougherty October 26th 04 07:06 PM

Doug Smith W9WI said :

Peter Dougherty wrote:
band or new mode. In contests I find a steady cluster connection to be
a lifesaver (no more busted calls -- of course, you have to enter as
"assisted").


Dunno, seeing some of the busted spots that show up during a contest one
has to begin to wonder whether *not* having cluster constitutes
"assistance"grin!


Yeah, that's true too, but on the whole between listening and seeing
the spots, I've not busted one in any of the contests I've played in
yet.

73 de Peter, W2IRT
(ex-AB2NZ, VE3THX)

Please reply to Double-you Two Eye Are Tee at Arrl.net

G. Doughty October 27th 04 12:21 AM

Thanks for the help.

ki4bbl




G. Doughty October 27th 04 12:21 AM

Thanks for the help.

ki4bbl




William October 27th 04 03:49 AM

"Keyboard In The Wilderness" wrote in message news:awdfd.76614$hj.65646@fed1read07...
Telnet connections can be found at URL:

http://www.cpcug.org/user/wfeidt/Misc/cluster.html


10M is pretty grim now as we are on the down slide of the solar cycle -- but
some openings are still occurring as you will see when you connect to a
packet cluster via telnet.


--
The Anon Keyboard
I doubt, therefore I might be


About a decade ago, QST ran an article about a ham in Texas that had
DX contacts --daily--, even during sunspot minima.

Awful news, I guess.

But even a General can get on 20M.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com