Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 19th 03, 04:34 AM
Amateur Radio Station N0JAA
 
Posts: n/a
Default Amateur Radio Legal Issues List

Fellow Amateur Radio Operators,

I have created a new list that deals specifically with legal issues pertaining
to our hobby, the Amateur Radio Legal Issues List. The list is for the
dissemination and discussion of legal issues (such as PRB-1 and pending
legislation in Congress) and other related issues (court battles, etc.) that
can affect our hobby.

If you are interested in such a list, please send a blank email to
.

73's,
Paul Gray, N0JAA
Moderator, Amateur Radio Legal Issues List



"We have captured lightning and used it to teach sand how to think."



  #2   Report Post  
Old July 19th 03, 05:18 AM
VHFRadioBuff
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I have created a new list that deals specifically with legal issues
pertaining
to our hobby


How about one dealing with SPAMMING? I think one post, on rec.radio.amateur
would have been sufficient.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
73! de Andy KC2SSB (ex: KF4KHC/HL9HCT)
Beachwood, NJ USA! Grid FM29vw
http://vhfradiobuff.tripod.com
Fight Spam! http://spamcop.net
National "Do Not Call" Registry: http://donotcall.gov
  #3   Report Post  
Old July 19th 03, 05:18 AM
VHFRadioBuff
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I have created a new list that deals specifically with legal issues
pertaining
to our hobby


How about one dealing with SPAMMING? I think one post, on rec.radio.amateur
would have been sufficient.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
73! de Andy KC2SSB (ex: KF4KHC/HL9HCT)
Beachwood, NJ USA! Grid FM29vw
http://vhfradiobuff.tripod.com
Fight Spam! http://spamcop.net
National "Do Not Call" Registry: http://donotcall.gov
  #6   Report Post  
Old July 19th 03, 03:28 PM
VHFRadioBuff
 
Posts: n/a
Default

However, I wouldn't have seen that post, since I don't subscribe to
every single radio group.

jeff


Oh, I see. If someone has anything remotely amateur radio related, they should
post it on every amateur radio newsgroup so everyone sees it? That's just
silly. rec.radio.amateur is for general amateur radio related issues. The mere
fact that I'm replying to this (and that I replied to the original post) makes
me just as guilty as the original spammer.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
73! de Andy KC2SSB (ex: KF4KHC/HL9HCT)
Beachwood, NJ USA! Grid FM29vw
http://vhfradiobuff.tripod.com
Fight Spam! http://spamcop.net
National "Do Not Call" Registry: http://donotcall.gov
  #7   Report Post  
Old July 19th 03, 03:28 PM
VHFRadioBuff
 
Posts: n/a
Default

However, I wouldn't have seen that post, since I don't subscribe to
every single radio group.

jeff


Oh, I see. If someone has anything remotely amateur radio related, they should
post it on every amateur radio newsgroup so everyone sees it? That's just
silly. rec.radio.amateur is for general amateur radio related issues. The mere
fact that I'm replying to this (and that I replied to the original post) makes
me just as guilty as the original spammer.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
73! de Andy KC2SSB (ex: KF4KHC/HL9HCT)
Beachwood, NJ USA! Grid FM29vw
http://vhfradiobuff.tripod.com
Fight Spam! http://spamcop.net
National "Do Not Call" Registry: http://donotcall.gov
  #8   Report Post  
Old July 19th 03, 03:30 PM
VHFRadioBuff
 
Posts: n/a
Default

As far as I am concerned, this gentleman's posting could (should?) have been
posted in each and every user group that relates in any fashion to ham
radio.


Cross posting and off topic posting is a violation of many an ISP's TOS.

The fact is that every post has it's place. If that were not the case, we'd
eliminate every amateur radio newsgroup except for rec.radio.amateur.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
73! de Andy KC2SSB (ex: KF4KHC/HL9HCT)
Beachwood, NJ USA! Grid FM29vw
http://vhfradiobuff.tripod.com
Fight Spam! http://spamcop.net
National "Do Not Call" Registry: http://donotcall.gov
  #9   Report Post  
Old July 19th 03, 03:30 PM
VHFRadioBuff
 
Posts: n/a
Default

As far as I am concerned, this gentleman's posting could (should?) have been
posted in each and every user group that relates in any fashion to ham
radio.


Cross posting and off topic posting is a violation of many an ISP's TOS.

The fact is that every post has it's place. If that were not the case, we'd
eliminate every amateur radio newsgroup except for rec.radio.amateur.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
73! de Andy KC2SSB (ex: KF4KHC/HL9HCT)
Beachwood, NJ USA! Grid FM29vw
http://vhfradiobuff.tripod.com
Fight Spam! http://spamcop.net
National "Do Not Call" Registry: http://donotcall.gov
  #10   Report Post  
Old July 19th 03, 04:08 PM
Floyd Davidson
 
Posts: n/a
Default

pamme (VHFRadioBuff) wrote:
As far as I am concerned, this gentleman's posting could (should?) have been
posted in each and every user group that relates in any fashion to ham
radio.


Cross posting and off topic posting is a violation of many an ISP's TOS.


No, it was *NOT* crossposted, and it *should* have been.
Instead the message was multiposted to at least 5 newsgroups
individually.

*Multiposting* is *never* appropriate. Crossposting _to_
_appropriate_ newsgroups is _always_ appropriate.

The fact is that every post has it's place. If that were not the case, we'd
eliminate every amateur radio newsgroup except for rec.radio.amateur.


Some posts have many places, and that is why crossposting is a
facility available on Usenet. And while abuse is relatively
common, that particular instance would have been perhaps
reasonable *if* it had been crossposted instead of multiposted.

And while we discuss Usenet protocols, your signature is

1) too long
2) lacks the appropriate delimiter line, "-- ", between
it and the text of your message.

It seems reasonable that if you are going to rant about the
way someone else posts, you might want to be a little more
correct yourself. :-)

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
73! de Andy KC2SSB (ex: KF4KHC/HL9HCT)
Beachwood, NJ USA! Grid FM29vw
http://vhfradiobuff.tripod.com
Fight Spam! http://spamcop.net
National "Do Not Call" Registry: http://donotcall.gov


--
Floyd L. Davidson http://web.newsguy.com/floyd_davidson
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska)
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 ­ June 25, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 June 25th 04 07:28 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 ­ June 25, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 June 25th 04 07:28 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400 ­ June 11, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 June 16th 04 08:34 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 January 18th 04 09:34 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 January 18th 04 09:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017