Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone written the FCC and told them to keep the code requirement?
If you have, Thanks. 73 de Slow Code |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone written the FCC and told them to keep the code requirement?
"Slow Code" wrote in message k.net... If you have, Thanks. 73 de Slow Code Nah, all HF bands are for sale. Lord help the rest of the world after the FCC finishes their work. People like SC are the reason for this. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone written the FCC and told them to keep the code requirement?
Slow Code wrote:
If you have, Thanks. 73 de Slow Code Don't forget the requirement to understand the construction, theory and maintenance of spark transmitters. -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com Posting from Google? See http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/ "Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" came out in April. See details at http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone written the FCC and told them to keep the code requirement?
"Slow Code" wrote in message k.net... If you have, Thanks. 73 de Slow Code No, but I asked them to start testing on PSK, RTTY, APRS, Computer Interface Logic and Theory and a half dozen other digital points. Does that help? KB1NXE |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone written the FCC and told them to keep the code requirement?
"James Philopena" wrote in
news:AL73h.1005$sw6.573@trndny08: "Slow Code" wrote in message k.net... If you have, Thanks. 73 de Slow Code No, but I asked them to start testing on PSK, RTTY, APRS, Computer Interface Logic and Theory and a half dozen other digital points. Does that help? KB1NXE I like it. SC |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|