Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 4th 06, 12:16 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
Default Anyone written the FCC and told them to keep the code requirement?



If you have, Thanks.

73
de Slow Code
  #2   Report Post  
Old November 4th 06, 12:55 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 570
Default Anyone written the FCC and told them to keep the code requirement?


"Slow Code" wrote in message
k.net...


If you have, Thanks.

73
de Slow Code


Nah, all HF bands are for sale. Lord help the rest of the world after the
FCC finishes their work. People like SC are the reason for this.


  #3   Report Post  
Old November 4th 06, 07:31 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 202
Default Anyone written the FCC and told them to keep the code requirement?

Slow Code wrote:

If you have, Thanks.

73
de Slow Code


Don't forget the requirement to understand the construction, theory and
maintenance of spark transmitters.

--

Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com

Posting from Google? See http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/

"Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" came out in April.
See details at http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html
  #4   Report Post  
Old November 4th 06, 09:38 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 12
Default Anyone written the FCC and told them to keep the code requirement?


"Slow Code" wrote in message
k.net...


If you have, Thanks.

73
de Slow Code


No, but I asked them to start testing on PSK, RTTY, APRS, Computer Interface
Logic and Theory and a half dozen other digital points. Does that help?

KB1NXE


  #5   Report Post  
Old November 4th 06, 11:58 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
Default Anyone written the FCC and told them to keep the code requirement?

"James Philopena" wrote in
news:AL73h.1005$sw6.573@trndny08:


"Slow Code" wrote in message
k.net...


If you have, Thanks.

73
de Slow Code


No, but I asked them to start testing on PSK, RTTY, APRS, Computer
Interface Logic and Theory and a half dozen other digital points. Does
that help?

KB1NXE



I like it.

SC
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017