Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 06:00:41 -0700, Telstar Electronics
wrote: On Sep 14, 4:48 pm, Wes Stewart wrote: On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 10:36:06 -0700, Telstar Electronics wrote: I'm hesitant to reply to this crap but I can't help myself. Other Processors Have a Problem... Other speech processors use a low-cost "audio clipping" approach to achieve compression. While this method is economical for the manufacturer, clipping distorts the original signal and sounds fuzzy on the air. Bafflegab. http://k6mhe.com/n7ws/ Note 5. Wes... the link you provided about the clipping type processor... on the first page of the article states a distortion of 10% THD. That's awful... LOL Laugh all you want but clearly you don't understand what you think you understand. We are talking "communication" systems here not hi-fi. If the intelligibility improves faster than the distortion due to instantaneous peak clipping then that is a net positive. As an aside, I actually did myself a disservice by defining the onset of clipping at the point where a 3 dB input change gave a 2 dB output change. This is actually quite a bit of clipping, which means that my "15 dB" clipping is considerably higher. At the usual operating level, distortion is much lower. Furthermore, following publication Schureuer offered some justified criticism over my use of the Plessey IC. This device was a source of some of the distortion, which is actually multiplied by the subsequent clipping process. I later built a discrete compressor using a linearized FET as the gain control element and also incorporated noise gating. Operationally, the distortion was negligible and the performance was phenomenal. But back to you. Your (actually Analog Device's) circuit is an AGC system and cannot limit instantaneous peaks. So following compression of a big peak, the amplitude of subsequent signals is reduced. This is helpful in preventing overdrive of subsequent stages and provides a marginal improvement in "talk power" but it is nowhere as effective as true peak clipping. Sorry, those are the facts. BTW, the Kenwood TS-870 (which I use) is widely acclaimed for its audio quality and is arguably the most sought after rig by the "hi-fi" SSB garglers. It uses split-band speech clipping. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
IDIOT!
"Telstar Electronics" wrote in message s.com... |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
CB Shops to distribute VoiceMax... | CB | |||
CB Shops to distribute VoiceMax... | CB | |||
VoiceMax Speech Processor | CB | |||
VoiceMax... | CB | |||
VoiceMax is Coming... | CB |